Physiological and Morphological Responses of two Quinoa Cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to Drought Stress

被引:0
|
作者
Ali, Oudou Issa [1 ]
Fghire, Rachid [1 ]
Anaya, Fatima [1 ]
Benlhabib, Ouafae [2 ]
Wahbi, Said [1 ]
机构
[1] Cadi Ayyad Univ, Fac Sci Semlalia, Lab Biotechnol & Plant Physiol, Marrakech, Morocco
[2] Agron & Vet Inst Hassan II, Dept Plant Prod Protect & Biotechnol, Rabat, Morocco
来源
GESUNDE PFLANZEN | 2019年 / 71卷 / 02期
关键词
Drought tolerance; Quinoa; Soil drought; Stress recovery; Water stress; WATER RELATIONS; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; DRYING PRD; MECHANISMS; TOLERANCE; GROWTH; ADAPTATION; SALINITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10343-019-00460-y
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to investigate the drought-related adaptation strategies of two quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars grown under controlled conditions. After 34days of growth, water was withheld until plants were severely wilted, then they were re-watered and left to recover. 20days later the experiment was reproduced. We analyzed growth, biomass, stomatal density, leaf water status, chlorophyll and malonyldialdehyde (MDA) content. Results showed that under water stress growth, biomass, stomatal density and leaf water status were significantly affected. On the other hand, results showed that water stress in the initial period can significantly increase the tolerance to drought during later phases. The data showed that quinoa drought tolerance may result from its capacity to maintain cell health status. Our findings provide new tracks into the mechanisms of drought tolerance in quinoa plants.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 133
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chlorophyll fluorescence and its relationship with physiological stress in Chenopodium quinoa Willd.
    Garcia-Parra, Miguel
    Stechauner-Rohringer, Roman
    Roa-Acosta, Diego
    Ortiz-Gonzalez, Daniel
    Ramirez-Correa, Jorge
    Plazas-Leguizamon, Nubia
    Colmenares-Cruz, Andres
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2020, 48 (04) : 1742 - 1755
  • [22] Identifying Some Morphological Features of Mutant Quinoa Plants (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Egritas, Omer
    Tan, Mustafa
    Haliloglu, Kamil
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2022, 45 (07) : 815 - 821
  • [23] Molecular mechanisms regulating glucose metabolism in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds under drought stress
    Wang, Chunmei
    Lu, Chuan
    Wang, Junling
    Liu, Xiaoqing
    Wei, Zhimin
    Qin, Yan
    Zhang, Huilong
    Wang, Xiaoxia
    Wei, Boxiang
    Lv, Wei
    Mu, Guojun
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [24] Distribution of minerals in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds
    Konishi, Y
    Hirano, S
    Tsuboi, H
    Wada, M
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 68 (01) : 231 - 234
  • [25] Salt tolerance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Adolf, Verena Isabelle
    Jacobsen, Sven-Erik
    Shabala, Sergey
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2013, 92 : 43 - 54
  • [26] Adaptation of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to Australian Environments
    Snowball, Richard
    Dhammu, Harmohinder S.
    D'Antuono, Mario Francesco
    Troldahl, David
    Biggs, Ian
    Thompson, Callen
    Warmington, Mark
    Pearce, Amanda
    Sharma, Darshan L.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [27] Nutritional and health benefits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Navruz-Varli, Semra
    Sanlier, Nevin
    JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2016, 69 : 371 - 376
  • [28] Nutritional and biological value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Vilcacundo, Ruben
    Hernandez-Ledesma, Blanca
    CURRENT OPINION IN FOOD SCIENCE, 2017, 14 : 1 - 6
  • [29] Breeding quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): potential and perspectives
    Andrés Zurita-Silva
    Francisco Fuentes
    Pablo Zamora
    Sven-Erik Jacobsen
    Andrés R. Schwember
    Molecular Breeding, 2014, 34 : 13 - 30
  • [30] Evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in coeliac disease
    Zevallos, V.
    Ciclitira, P. J.
    Suligoj, T.
    Herencia, L. I.
    Ellis, H. J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2007, 66 : 69A - 69A