A Note on Inferring Acyclic Network Structures Using Granger Causality Tests

被引:4
|
作者
Nagarajan, Radhakrishnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
来源
关键词
Granger Causality; VAR process; Gene Networks; TIME-SERIES EXPERIMENT; GENE-EXPRESSION; CELLULAR NETWORKS; PATHWAY SEARCH; MOTIFS; SCALE;
D O I
10.2202/1557-4679.1119
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Granger causality (GC) and its extension have been used widely to infer causal relationships from multivariate time series generated from biological systems. GC is ideally suited for causal inference in bivariate vector autoregressive process (VAR). A zero magnitude of the upper or lower off-diagonal element(s) in a bivariate VAR is indicative of lack of causal relationship in that direction resulting in true acyclic structures. However, in experimental settings, statistical tests, such as F-test that rely on the ratio of the mean-squared forecast errors, are used to infer significant GC relationships. The present study investigates acyclic approximations within the context of bidirectional two-gene network motifs modeled as bivariate VAR. The fine interplay between the model parameters in the bivariate VAR, namely: (i) transcriptional noise variance, (ii) autoregulatory feedback, and (iii) transcriptional coupling strength that can give rise to discrepancies in the ratio of the mean-squared forecast errors is investigated. Subsequently, their impact on statistical power is investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. More importantly, it is shown that one can arrive at acyclic approximations even for bi-directional networks for suitable choice of process parameters, significance level and sample size. While the results are discussed within the framework of transcriptional network, the analytical treatment provided is generic and likely to have significant impact across distinct paradigms.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigating soil moisture feedbacks on precipitation with tests of Granger causality
    Salvucci, GD
    Saleem, JA
    Kaufmann, R
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2002, 25 (8-12) : 1305 - 1312
  • [42] Exact recovery of Granger causality graphs with unconditional pairwise tests
    Kinnear, R. J.
    Mazumdar, R. R.
    NETWORK SCIENCE, 2023, 11 (03) : 431 - 457
  • [44] Echo state network models for nonlinear Granger causality
    Duggento, Andrea
    Guerrisi, Maria
    Toschi, Nicola
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2021, 379 (2212):
  • [45] A Granger causality analysis method based on GRBF network
    Chen, Huang
    Wang, Jian-Guo
    Ding, Pangbin
    Ye, Xiang-Yun
    Yao, Yuan
    Chen, He-Lin
    2023 IEEE 12TH DATA DRIVEN CONTROL AND LEARNING SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, DDCLS, 2023, : 1871 - 1876
  • [46] Granger causality using Jacobian in neural networks
    Suryadi, Lock Yue
    Chew, Lock Yue
    Ong, Yew-Soon
    CHAOS, 2023, 33 (02)
  • [47] Directed Network Defects in Alzheimer's Disease Using Granger Causality and Graph Theory
    Sun, Man
    Xie, Hua
    Tang, Yan
    CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH, 2020, 17 (10) : 939 - 947
  • [48] Neural Network-Based Classification of Anesthesia/Awareness Using Granger Causality Features
    Nicolaou, Nicoletta
    Georgiou, Julius
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 45 (02) : 77 - 88
  • [49] Biological network detection using forward backward pair-wise granger causality
    Furqan M.S.
    Siyal M.Y.
    International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science and Technology, 2016, 17 (34): : 4.1 - 4.6
  • [50] A note on the Hiemstra-Jones test for Granger non-causality
    Diks, C
    Panchenko, V
    STUDIES IN NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 9 (02):