Determination of the spread rate in opposed-flow flame spread over thick solid fuels in the thermal regime

被引:0
|
作者
Bhattacharjee, S [1 ]
West, J [1 ]
Altenkirch, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Limitations of the assumptions in the classic de Ris formula [1] for opposed-flow flame spread rate over thick fuels in the thermal regime are explored through numerical experiments in which the assumptions used in the original theory are eliminated one by one from the mathematical model. While the assumptions of infinite-rate chemistry, mass flux linearization, and neglect of radiation are found to be reasonable in the thermal regime, assumptions of a slug flow, a surface-hugging flame, and constant properties are responsible for the predictions of spread rate being in error by as much as a factor of 10. A spread rate formula, derived from a semiempirical solution of a simplified problem, is shown to overcome the drawbacks of the de Ris formula while retaining its simplicity. A hydrodynamic coefficient, developed for two different flow configurations, and a flame liftoff coefficient, both obtainable from the known parameters of the problem, correct for some of the major limiting assumptions in the de Ris theory. The formula developed here, which can be written as (V) over cap(f,EST) = F-EST(2)/beta(5)beta(6) (V) over cap(eqv) in which (V) over cap(eqv) contains the hydrodynamic information and the factor in front of it the chemical information, performs significantly better than the de Ris formula when tested against available data and extensive computational results for different flow configurations, opposed-flow velocities, oxygen levels, and ambient pressures.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1485
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental studies on the three-dimensional effects of opposed-flow flame spread over thin solid materials
    Zhang, Xia
    Yu, Yong
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2011, 158 (06) : 1193 - 1200
  • [32] Opposed-flow flame spread across n-propanol pools
    Schiller, DN
    Sirignano, WA
    TWENTY-SIXTH SYMPOSIUM (INTERNATIONAL) ON COMBUSTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 1319 - 1325
  • [33] Effects of boundary layer displacement and separation on opposed-flow flame spread
    Higuera, FJ
    Linan, A
    Iglesias, I
    COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 1997, 1 (01) : 65 - 78
  • [34] A model of transport of fuel gases in a charring solid and its application to opposed-flow flame spread
    Baum, Howard R.
    Atreya, Arvind
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2007, 31 (2633-2641) : 2633 - 2641
  • [35] Opposed flame spread over thick solid fuels under influence of sub-atmospheric pressure and low-velocity flow
    Zhu, Feng
    Wang, Shuangfeng
    Lu, Zhanbin
    Wu, Chuanjia
    FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2021, 125
  • [36] Opposed-flow ignition and flame spread over melting polymers with Navier-Stokes gas flow
    Zheng, GY
    Wichman, IS
    Bénard, A
    COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 2002, 6 (02) : 317 - 337
  • [37] Propagation and extinction mechanisms of opposed-flow flame spread over PMMA for different sample orientations
    Ito, A
    Kudo, Y
    Oyama, H
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2005, 142 (04) : 428 - 437
  • [38] Radiative, thermal, and kinetic regimes of opposed-flow flame spread: A comparison between experiment and theory
    Bhattacharjee, Subrata
    Simsek, Aslihan
    Miller, Fletcher
    Olson, Sandra
    Ferkul, Paul
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2017, 36 (02) : 2963 - 2969
  • [39] Prediction of Flame Length in Opposed-Flow Flame Spread: Global Similarity Analysis and Experiments
    Bhattacharjee, Subrata
    Carmignani, Luca
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 194 (13) : 2659 - 2673
  • [40] Heat transfer pathways in flame spreading over thick fuels as a function of the flame spread regime: Microgravity, thermal, and kinetic
    West, J
    King, M
    Bhattacharjee, S
    Altenkirch, RA
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 127 (1-6) : 119 - 140