Interaction between vehicles and pedestrians at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks

被引:58
|
作者
Chen, Peng [1 ]
Wu, Chaozhong [2 ]
Zhu, Shunying [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Transportat, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, Engn Res Ctr Transportat Safety, Minist Educ, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crosswalk; Pedestrian; Vehicle; Cumulative prospect theory; Evolutionary game; PROSPECT-THEORY; MODEL; TIME; FLOW; CHOICE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.016
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Pedestrian crossing safety has attracted increased attention in recent years. However, little research has been conducted for examining the interaction between vehicles and pedestrians at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks. In this paper, both a decision model and a motion model are developed for simulating this interaction process. Cumulative prospect theory is embedded in the evolutionary game framework for modeling the decision behaviors of drivers and pedestrians during the interactions, which can capture the phenomenon of disagreement among a pedestrian crossing group. Cellular automata-based moving rules are used to depict the motion of vehicles with consideration of the three-second rule, and a modified bidirectional pedestrian model is developed in order to consider the right-moving preference and resolve the deadlock among mixed flows. Results of calibration and validation of the proposed model are also presented. An application is designed for the purpose of illustrating the model's capabilities. The results demonstrate that the proposed model can well replicate actual observed traffic. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Investigating the motivation for pedestrians' risky crossing behaviour at urban mid-block road sections
    Soathong, Ajjima
    Chowdhury, Subeh
    Wilson, Douglas
    Ranjitkar, Prakash
    TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2021, 22 : 155 - 165
  • [32] Motor-vehicle collisions involving child pedestrians at intersection and mid-block locations
    Bennet, Scott A.
    Yiannakoulias, Nikolaos
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2015, 78 : 94 - 103
  • [33] Survey of pedestrians' crossing time at non-signalized mid-block street crossing
    Zhao, Yunan
    Chen, Qun
    Qin, Jin
    Xue, Xingjian
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2016, 50 (08) : 2193 - 2208
  • [34] Advance yield markings and drivers' performance in response to multiple-threat scenarios at mid-block crosswalks
    Fisher, Donald
    Garay-Vega, Lisandra
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2012, 44 (01): : 35 - 41
  • [35] Impact of vehicular trafflc stream on pedestrian crossing behavior at an uncontrolled mid-block section
    Agarwal, Somya
    Vikram, Durgesh
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 9
  • [36] Investigating effect of surrounding factors on human behaviour at un-controlled mid-block crosswalks in indian cities
    Avinash, Chaudhari
    Jiten, Shah
    Arkatkar, Shriniwas
    Gaurang, Joshi
    Manoranjan, Parida
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 119 : 174 - 187
  • [37] Models for pedestrian gap acceptance behaviour analysis at unprotected mid-block crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions
    Kadali, B. Raghuram
    Vedagiri, P.
    Rathi, Nivedan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 32 : 114 - 126
  • [38] Estimating potential conflicts between right-turn-on-red vehicles and pedestrians at crosswalks
    Kim, Wonho
    Kim, Gur-joong
    Lee, Dongmin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (02) : 226 - 240
  • [39] Analysis of Vehicular Pedestrian Interaction at Urban Undesignated Mid-block Sections
    Golakiya, Hareshkumar Dahyabhai
    Patkar, Manish
    Dhamaniya, Ashish
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2020, 45 : 389 - 407
  • [40] A Hybrid Control Design for Autonomous Vehicles at Uncontrolled Crosswalks
    Kapania, Nitin R.
    Govindarajan, Vijay
    Borrelli, Francesco
    Gerdes, J. Christian
    2019 30TH IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV19), 2019, : 1604 - 1611