Shared decision-making for women facing an unplanned pregnancy: A qualitative study

被引:5
|
作者
Ueno, Yoko [1 ]
Kako, Mayumi [1 ]
Ohira, Mitsuko [1 ]
Okamura, Hitoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Sci, Hiroshima, Japan
关键词
health care; Japan; pregnancy; qualitative; shared decision‐ making abortion women' s health; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; PRIMARY-CARE; SUPPORT; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; EDUCATION; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1111/nhs.12791
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
This study aimed to explore the competencies of health care practitioners who promote shared decision-making (SDM)-based care for women facing an unplanned pregnancy in Japan. We conducted semistructured interviews with 12 care providers who are pioneers in care for women facing an unplanned pregnancy and adopted a modified grounded theory approach for data analysis. A three-step model for shared decision making in practice (team talk, option talk, and decision talk) was used as a reference. The answers given by the care providers were analyzed to identify the competencies involved in shared decision making. We identified three stages: (i) building trust and promoting women's expression; (ii) discussing women's real needs; and (iii) exploring the intentions and goals expressed by women and finding the best choices while promoting women's autonomy in decision-making. The coordination between the support of partners, families, and professionals, and the care provided to strengthen women's identities facilitated shared decision making. Women facing an unplanned pregnancy can benefit from interventions designed to improve shared decision making. A key component of shared decision making-based care relates to practitioners' raised awareness toward their roles and responsibilities: developing good communication skills and fostering collaboration between all stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1186 / 1196
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shared decision-making with involuntary hospital patients: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators
    Giacco, Domenico
    Mavromara, Liza
    Gamblen, Jennifer
    Conneely, Maev
    Priebe, Stefan
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2018, 4 (03): : 113 - 118
  • [22] Trust and shared decision-making among individuals with multiple myeloma: A qualitative study
    Whitney, Robin L.
    White, Anne Elizabeth Clark
    Rosenberg, Aaron S.
    Kravitz, Richard L.
    Kim, Katherine K.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22): : 8040 - 8057
  • [23] Shared decision-making in psoriasis treatment: a qualitative interview study on the prescription of apremilast
    Hewitt, R.
    Bundy, C.
    Newi, A. -L.
    Chachos, E.
    Sommer, R.
    Kleyn, C. E.
    Augustin, M.
    Griffiths, C. E. M.
    Blome, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 186 (01) : E55 - E56
  • [24] Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study
    Abma, Inger L.
    Roelofs, Lianne C. G.
    van der Kolk, Marion B.
    Mulder, Sasja F.
    Schers, Henk J.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (04)
  • [25] Patient and clinician perspectives on shared decision-making in infertility treatment: A qualitative study
    Geng, Ling
    Shi, Zhao
    Chai, Xiao-yun
    Nie, Hong-wei
    Cong, Hong-bin
    Li, Shun Ping
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 116
  • [26] Shared Decision-making for Families Facing Adversity and the Role of the Medical Home
    Cohen, Alyssa R.
    Kan, Kristin
    Johnson, Meredith
    Michelson, Kelly N.
    Heard-Garris, Nia J.
    PEDIATRICS, 2022, 149 (01)
  • [27] Shared decision-making
    Dirksen-Fischer, M
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2004, 66 (05) : 318 - 318
  • [28] Shared decision-making
    Steven, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2001, 51 (462): : 61 - 62
  • [29] Shared decision-making
    Berger, Abi
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2019, 45 (02) : 168 - 168
  • [30] Shared Decision-Making
    Wright, Linda S.
    NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2022, 49 (06) : 537 - 540