Textual classification of SEC comment letters

被引:53
|
作者
Ryans, James P. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
SEC comment letters; Financial reporting quality; Enforcement; Text classification; Restatements; Write-downs; Naï ve Bayes; Latent Dirichlet allocation; CROSS-SECTIONAL DETERMINANTS; EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENT DRIFT; INFORMATION-CONTENT; DISCLOSURE; MARKET; ANALYST; COST; RESTATEMENTS; CONSEQUENCES; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-020-09565-6
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of SEC comment letters on future financial reporting outcomes and earnings credibility. Naive Bayesian classification identifies comment letters associated with future restatements and write-downs. An investor attention-based quantitative measure of importance, using EDGAR downloads, also predicts these outcomes. Disclosure-event abnormal returns, revenue recognition comments, and the number of letters in a conversation appear to be useful quantitative metrics for classifying importance in certain settings. This study also documents trends in comment letter topics over time and identifies topics associated with the textual and quantitative classifications of importance, providing insights into the factors that draw investor attention and that relate to future restatements and write-downs. Innocuous comment letters are associated with improvements in earnings credibility following comment letter reviews.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 80
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SEC comment letters on form S-4 and M&A accounting quality
    Johnson, Bret A.
    Lisic, Ling Lei
    Moon, Joon Seok
    Wang, Mengmeng
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2023, 28 (02) : 862 - 909
  • [32] SEC comment letters on form S-4 and M&A accounting quality
    Bret A. Johnson
    Ling Lei Lisic
    Joon Seok Moon
    Mengmeng Wang
    Review of Accounting Studies, 2023, 28 : 862 - 909
  • [33] Regulator Continuity and Decision-Making Quality: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters
    Kubic, Matthew
    Toynbee, Sara
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 98 (01): : 365 - 398
  • [34] TYPES OF LETTERS - INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF TEXTUAL CLASSIFICATION - GERMAN - ERMERT,K
    SILIAKUS, HJ
    AUMLA-JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALASIAN UNIVERSITIES LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE ASSOCIATION, 1980, (54): : 302 - 303
  • [35] Reviewing the SEC's Review Process: 10-K Comment Letters and the Cost of Remediation
    Cassell, Cory A.
    Dreher, Lauren M.
    Myers, Linda A.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2013, 88 (06): : 1875 - 1908
  • [36] SEC Comment Letters on Firms' Use of Non-GAAP Measures: The Determinants and Firms' Responses
    Jo, Koren M.
    Yang, Shuo
    ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2020, 34 (02) : 167 - 184
  • [37] The Switch-Up: An Examination of Changes in Earnings Management after Receiving SEC Comment Letters
    Cunningham, Lauren M.
    Johnson, Bret A.
    Johnson, E. Scott
    Lisic, Ling Lei
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2020, 37 (02) : 917 - 944
  • [38] COMMENT LETTER TO THE SEC
    MILLER, AP
    URBAN LAWYER, 1994, 26 (04): : 929 - 955
  • [39] TEXTUAL PROBLEMS IN THE LETTERS OF SYNESIOS
    GARZYA, A
    BYZANTINE STUDIES, 1978, 5 (1-2): : 125 - 136
  • [40] Textual contentions (Comment)
    Egan, G
    TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 2004, (5290): : 15 - 15