Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis

被引:133
|
作者
Dellgren, G
David, TE
Raanani, E
Armstrong, S
Ivanov, J
Rakowski, H
机构
[1] Toronto Gen Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Toronto, ON M5N 2C4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mtc.2002.121672
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this Study was to investigate the long-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calit), which has been used in our institution since 1984. Methods: From January 1984 to December 1995, the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis was used for aortic valve replacement in 254 patients (male/fernale ratio 117:137) with a mean age of 71 years (range 25-87 years). Before the operation, 216 patients (85%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. The predominant diagnosis was aortic stenosis (n = 219.86%). Associated Surgical procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 130 cases (51%), mitral valve replacement in 11 cases (4%), and tricuspid or mitral valve repair in 12 cases (5%). Previous cardiac operations had been performed in 36 cases (14%). Follow-up was 100% complete at a mean of 60 +/- 31 months. Univariate estimates of time-related cumulative probabilities were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable adjustment was performed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Echocardiography was performed in 61% of long-term survivors. Results: There were I I early deaths (4%) and 58 late deaths. Actuarial survivals at 5, 10, and 12 years were 80% +/- 3% 50% +/- 8%, and 36% +/- 9%, respectively. At 12 years the freedom from cardiac death was 73% +/- 7%. the freedom from valve-related death was 84% +/- 11%, the freedom from valve reoperation was 83% +/- 9%, the freedom from primary tissue failure was 86% +/- 9%, the freedom from thromboembolism was 67% +/- 13%, and the freedom from endocarditis was 98% +/- 1%. Echocardiography was performed on long-term survivors (mean follow-up 67 +/- 25 months) and showed that transvalvular peak and mean pressure differences measured with Doppler echocardiography were 23.2 +/- 9.6 and 12.3 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, respectively. Aortic regurgitation was found by Doppler echocardiography to be none or trivial, mild, moderate, and severe in 64%, 30% 3%, and 1% of patients, respectively. Mean left ventricular mass index was 107.2 +/- 35.3 g/m(2) (118.9+/-40.2 g/m(2) in men and 98.8 +/- 28.8 g/m(2) in women) at late follow-up. One third of all patients, regardless of sex (n = 26/64 women and n = 14/45 men). had evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. However, our analyses indicate that the residual left ventricular hypertrophy was not caused by valve mismatch but was probably multifactorial. Conclusion: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis has provided satisfactory clinical and hemodynamic outcome. However, at long-term follow-up about one third of the patients being investigated still had left ventricular hypertrophy examined by echocardiography.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 154
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INVIVO HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL VALVE IN THE AORTIC POSITION
    COSGROVE, DM
    LYTLE, BW
    WILLIAMS, GW
    CIRCULATION, 1984, 70 (04) : 327 - 327
  • [22] HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE NEW AORTIC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS
    LEE, G
    GREHL, TM
    JOYE, JA
    KAKU, RF
    HARTER, W
    DEMARIA, AN
    MASON, DT
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1978, 4 (04): : 373 - 381
  • [23] HEMODYNAMIC EVALUATION OF THE CARPENTIER-EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS IN THE AORTIC POSITION
    ROTHKOPF, M
    DAVIDSON, T
    LIPSCOMB, K
    NARAHARA, K
    HILLIS, LD
    WILLERSON, JT
    ESTRERA, A
    PLATT, M
    MILLS, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1979, 44 (02): : 209 - 214
  • [24] HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF CARPENTIER-EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS IN AORTIC POSITION
    JOYE, JA
    LEE, G
    GREHL, T
    DEMARIA, AN
    HURLEY, E
    KAKU, R
    HARTER, W
    WALLACE, S
    MASON, DT
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1978, 26 (03): : A241 - A241
  • [25] Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT bioprosthesis series in elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: a retrospective cohort study
    Nishioka, Naritomo
    Yamada, Akira
    Ujihira, Kosuke
    Iba, Yutaka
    Maruyama, Ryushi
    Hatta, Eiichiro
    Kurimoto, Yoshihiko
    Nakanishi, Katsuhiko
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 64 (12) : 728 - 734
  • [26] Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position
    Takakura, H
    Sasaki, T
    Hashimoto, K
    Hachiya, T
    Onoguchi, K
    Oshiumi, M
    Takeuchi, S
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 71 (02): : 609 - 613
  • [27] Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT bioprosthesis series in elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: a retrospective cohort study
    Naritomo Nishioka
    Akira Yamada
    Kosuke Ujihira
    Yutaka Iba
    Ryushi Maruyama
    Eiichiro Hatta
    Yoshihiko Kurimoto
    Katsuhiko Nakanishi
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016, 64 : 728 - 734
  • [28] Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement
    Khan, SS
    Siegel, RJ
    DeRobertis, MA
    Blanche, CE
    Kass, RM
    Cheng, W
    Fontana, GP
    Trento, A
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (02): : 531 - 535
  • [29] Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement
    Puvimanasinghe, JPA
    Takkenberg, JJM
    Eijkemans, MJC
    van Herwerden, LA
    Jamieson, WRE
    Grunkemeier, GL
    Habbema, JDF
    Bogers, AJJC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 29 (03) : 374 - 379
  • [30] Failure modes of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position
    Roselli, EE
    Smedira, NG
    Blackstone, EH
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2006, 15 (03): : 421 - 427