Strategies for improving the environmental performance of nickel production in China: Insight into a life cycle assessment

被引:34
|
作者
Bai, Yueyang [1 ]
Zhang, Tianzuo [1 ]
Zhai, Yijie [1 ]
Jia, Yuke [1 ]
Ren, Ke [1 ]
Hong, Jinglan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shandong Key Lab Environm Proc & Hlth, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Shandong Univ Climate Change & Hlth Ctr, Publ Hlth Sch, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sulphide ore; Mining and beneficiation stages; China; Urban mining; Marginal electricity structure; SYSTEM; SUSTAINABILITY; XINJIANG; IMPACTS; METALS; ENERGY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114949
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nickel is a critical metal for global low-carbon energy transition, but its production processes require massive energy inputs and emit large amounts of pollutants. This study constructed life cycle inventories of the mainstream electrolytic nickel production chains in China at the industrial level and subsequently evaluated their environmental performance via a regionalised life cycle impact assessment method. Results show that environmental indicator results of the electrolytic nickel production from the leaching electrowinning method were 17.7%-40.2% lower than those from the grind and flotation electrolytic method. At the endpoint level, the nickel mining and beneficiation stages contributed 54.7%-65.91% of human health damage, 83.0%-84.7% of ecosystem quality damage and 80.8%-83.7% of resources damage. The key processes, including direct processes, cement input and energy consumption (e.g., electricity and coal), accounted for more than 62.1% of the impacts in the key midpoint categories. The potential environmental damage of China's nickel mining and beneficiation industry increased by 29.2% from 2010 to 2018 because of the growing trend of nickel ore demand. In the case that China's nickel metal recovery rate reaches the global average level, then approximately 3.83 x 10(2) Daly of human health damage, 59.83 Species.year of ecosystem quality damage and 1.64 x 10(8) $ of resources damage can be avoided annually. Strategies for promoting the full assimilation of renewable electricity, applying the clinker-free cemented backfill materials in the mining process, precious recovery by bioleaching from tailings and reusing waste rock as building materials are recommended. Meanwhile, extended producer responsibility should to be comprehensively implemented in the nickel-related industries to alleviate the environmental implications and nickel supply pressures from geo-mining.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of lead refining in China
    Jingmin Hong
    Zhaohe Yu
    Wenxiao Shi
    Jinglan Hong
    Congcong Qi
    Liping Ye
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 909 - 918
  • [42] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of Phosphogypsum utilization in China
    Chen, Lu
    Luan, Xiaoyu
    Han, Feng
    Zhao, Yuwei
    Yang, Huiying
    Zhang, Long
    Yin, Yongquan
    Liu, Wei
    Cui, Zhaojie
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2025, 212
  • [43] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of lead refining in China
    Hong, Jingmin
    Yu, Zhaohe
    Shi, Wenxiao
    Hong, Jinglan
    Qi, Congcong
    Ye, Liping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (06): : 909 - 918
  • [44] Life cycle environmental impacts assessment for residential buildings in China
    Gu, DJ
    Liu, JJ
    Gu, LJ
    INDOOR AIR 2005: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE, VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 3166 - 3170
  • [45] Assessing the Environmental Performance of Palm Oil Biodiesel Production in Indonesia: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Wahyono, Yoyon
    Hadiyanto, Hadiyanto
    Budihardjo, Mochamad Arief
    Adiansyah, Joni Safaat
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (12)
  • [46] Sustainability of wood products: environmental performance of wood pellets' production by means of Life Cycle Assessment
    Laschi, Andrea
    Marchi, Enrico
    Garcia, Sara Gonzalez
    FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: CHALLENGES FOR FOREST ENGINEERING, 2016, : 317 - 317
  • [47] Environmental life cycle assessment of corn production in tropical regions
    Hossein, Hekmat Younes
    Azizpanah, Amir
    Namdari, Majid
    Shirkhani, Hamidreza
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [48] Environmental life cycle assessment of cereal and bread production in Norway
    Korsaeth, A.
    Jacobsen, A. Z.
    Roer, A. -G.
    Henriksen, T. M.
    Sonesson, U.
    Bonesmo, H.
    Skjelvag, A. O.
    Stromman, A. H.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 62 (04): : 242 - 253
  • [49] Environmental assessment of Micro/Nano production in a life cycle perspective
    Olsen, Stig Irving
    Jorgensen, Michael Sogaard
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS TOOLS FOR GREEN MATERIALS AND PROCESS SELECTION, 2006, 895 : 159 - +
  • [50] Environmental Performance of Alternative Hospital Waste Management Strategies Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach
    Mushtaq, Muhammad Hammad
    Noor, Fahad
    Mujtaba, M. A.
    Asghar, Salman
    Yusuf, Abdulfatah Abdu
    Soudagar, Manzoore Elahi M.
    Hussain, Abrar
    Badran, Mohamed Fathy
    Shahapurkar, Kiran
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)