Identification of Patients with Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Using Administrative Claims Data

被引:0
|
作者
Sangal, Rohit B. [1 ,5 ]
Fodeh, Samah [1 ,5 ]
Taylor, Andrew [1 ,5 ]
Rothenberg, Craig [1 ,5 ]
Finn, Emily B. [4 ,5 ]
Sheth, Kevin [2 ,5 ]
Matouk, Charles [3 ]
Ulrich, Andrew [1 ,5 ]
Parwani, Vivek [1 ,5 ]
Sather, John [1 ,5 ]
Venkatesh, Arjun [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dept Emergency Med, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Dept Neurol, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Dept Neurosurg, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
来源
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Stroke; Quality; Health services research; Intracranial hemorrhage; ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; ICD-9-CM; CODES;
D O I
10.1016/j.strokecerebrovasdis.2020.105306
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a neurological emergency of research interest; however, unlike ischemic stroke, has not been well studied in large datasets due to the lack of an established administrative claims-based definition. We aimed to evaluate both explicit diagnosis codes and machine learning methods to create a claims-based definition for this clinical phenotype. Methods: We examined all patients admitted to our tertiary medical center with a primary or secondary International Classification of Disease version 9 (ICD-9) or 10 (ICD-10) code for ICH in claims from any portion of the hospitalization in 2014-2015. As a gold standard, we defined the nontraumatic ICH phenotype based on manual chart review. We tested explicit definitions based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 that had been previously published in the literature as well as four machine learning classifiers including support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression with LASSO, random forest and xgboost. We report five standard measures of model performance for each approach. Results: A total of 1830 patients with 2145 unique ICD-10 codes were included in the initial dataset, of which 437 (24%) were true positive based on manual review. The explicit ICD-10 definition performed best (Sensitivity = 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.92), Specificity = 0.83 (0.81-0.85), F-score = 0.73 (0.69-0.77)) and improves on an explicit ICD-9 definition (Sensitivity = 0.87 (0.83-0.90), Specificity = 0.77 (0.74-0.79), F-score = 0.67 (0.63-0.71). Among machine learning classifiers, SVM performed best (Sensitivity = 0.78 (0.75-0.82), Specificity = 0.84 (0.81-0.87), AUC = 0.89 (0.87-0.92), F-score = 0.66 (0.62-0.69)). Conclusions: An explicit ICD-10 definition can be used to accurately identify patients with a nontraumatic ICH phenotype with substantially better performance than ICD-9. An explicit ICD-10 based definition is easier to implement and quantitatively not appreciably improved with the additional application of machine learning classifiers. Future research utilizing large datasets should utilize this definition to address important research gaps.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Novel screening metric for the identification of at-risk peripheral artery disease patients using administrative claims data
    Bali, Vishal
    Yermilov, Irina
    Coutts, Kayla
    Legorreta, Antonio P.
    VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2016, 21 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [22] Identification of disease progression stages in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy using administrative claims data in the United States
    Zhong, Y.
    Iff, J.
    Gupta, D.
    Tuttle, E.
    Schrader, R.
    NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 2020, 30 : S81 - S81
  • [23] Interhospital Transfer is Not a Predictor of In-Hospital Mortality for Patients With Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage
    Yip, M. F.
    Sather, J. E.
    Sheth, K. N.
    Matouk, C. C.
    Littauer, R.
    Finn, E.
    Rothenberg, C. M.
    Costello, D.
    Parwani, V
    Venkatesh, A. K.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 70 (04) : S116 - S117
  • [24] A Qualitative Study of Risks Related to Interhospital Transfer of Patients with Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage
    Finn, Emily B.
    Britton, Meredith J. Campbell
    Rosenberg, Alana P.
    Sather, John E.
    Marcolini, Evie G.
    Feder, Shelli L.
    Sheth, Kevin N.
    Matouk, Charles C.
    Pham, Laura T. L.
    Ulrich, Andrew S.
    Parwani, Vivek L.
    Hodshon, Beth
    Venkatesh, Arjun K.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 28 (06): : 1759 - 1766
  • [25] Identification Of Mechanically Ventilated Patients Using Administrative Data
    Wonneberger, K.
    Madden, V.
    Kent, S.
    Liu, V.
    Halpern, S. D.
    Kerlin, M. P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [26] Predicting Hospital Readmission in Medicaid Patients With Diabetes Using Administrative and Claims Data
    Yun, Jaehyeon
    Filardo, Giovanni
    Ahuja, Vishal
    Bowen, Michael E.
    Heitjan, Daniel F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2023, 29 (08): : E229 - +
  • [27] Development of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data
    Princic, Nicole
    Gregory, Chris
    Willson, Tina
    Mahue, Maya
    Felici, Diana
    Werther, Winifred
    Lenhart, Gregory
    Foley, Kathy
    BLOOD, 2015, 126 (23)
  • [28] Comorbidities in Patients with Thyroid Cancer Evaluated Using US Administrative Claims Data
    Hirst, Ceri
    Ryan, James
    Tunceli, Ozgur
    Zhou, Siting
    David, Kern
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 : 413 - 414
  • [29] Use of Administrative Claims Data for Identifying Patients with Cirrhosis
    Nehra, Mahendra S.
    Ma, Ying
    Clark, Christopher
    Amarasingham, Ruben
    Rockey, Don C.
    Singal, Amit G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 47 (05) : E50 - E54
  • [30] Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients with intracranial hemorrhage: Retrospective cohort study with administrative data in Japan
    Imai, Shinobu
    Koizumi, Masato
    Wang, Chi-Chuan
    Han, Euna
    Akazawa, Manabu
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 372 - 373