PPIRank - an advanced method for ranking protein-protein interations in TAP/MS data

被引:4
|
作者
Sun, Xiaoyun [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Pengyu [1 ]
Kulkarni, Meghana [1 ,2 ]
Kwon, Young [1 ,2 ]
Perrimon, Norbert [2 ]
机构
[1] Brandeis Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Genet, Boston, MA USA
来源
PROTEOME SCIENCE | 2013年 / 11卷
关键词
PURIFICATION-MASS SPECTROMETRY; INTERACTION NETWORKS; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS; COMPLEXES; PROTEOMICS; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1186/1477-5956-11-S1-S16
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Tandem affinity purification coupled with mass-spectrometry (TAP/MS) analysis is a popular method for the identification of novel endogenous protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in large-scale. Computational analysis of TAP/MS data is a critical step, particularly for high-throughput datasets, yet it remains challenging due to the noisy nature of TAP/MS data. Results: We investigated several major TAP/MS data analysis methods for identifying PPIs, and developed an advanced method, which incorporates an improved statistical method to filter out false positives from the negative controls. Our method is named PPIRank that stands for PPI ranking in TAP/MS data. We compared PPIRank with several other existing methods in analyzing two pathway-specific TAP/MS PPI datasets from Drosophila. Conclusion: Experimental results show that PPIRank is more capable than other approaches in terms of identifying known interactions collected in the BioGRID PPI database. Specifically, PPIRank is able to capture more true interactions and simultaneously less false positives in both Insulin and Hippo pathways of Drosophila Melanogaster.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving Protein-Protein Interaction Pair Ranking with an Integrated Global Association Score
    Tsai, Richard Tzong-Han
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 9 (06) : 1690 - 1695
  • [22] Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions
    Duan, YH
    Reddy, BVB
    Kaznessis, YN
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (02) : 316 - 328
  • [23] What method to use for protein-protein docking?
    Porter, Kathryn A.
    Desta, Israel
    Kozakov, Dima
    Vajda, Sandor
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 55 : 1 - 7
  • [24] Prediction of protein function using protein-protein interaction data
    Deng, MH
    Zhang, K
    Mehta, S
    Chen, T
    Sun, FZ
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (06) : 947 - 960
  • [25] A new essential protein discovery method based on the integration of protein-protein interaction and gene expression data
    Li, Min
    Zhang, Hanhui
    Wang, Jian-xin
    Pan, Yi
    BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2012, 6
  • [26] A Method for Predicting Protein-Protein Interaction Types
    Silberberg, Yael
    Kupiec, Martin
    Sharan, Roded
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [27] A hybrid method for protein-protein interface prediction
    Hwang, Howook
    Petrey, Donald
    Honig, Barry
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (01) : 159 - 165
  • [28] Prediction of protein function using protein-protein interaction data
    Deng, MH
    Zhang, K
    Mehta, S
    Chen, T
    Sun, FZ
    CSB2002: IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY BIOINFORMATICS CONFERENCE, 2002, : 197 - 206
  • [29] In Silico Protein-Protein Interactions: Avoiding Data and Method Biases Over Sensitivity and Specificity
    Folador, Edson Luiz
    de Oliveira Junior, Alberto Fernandes
    Tiwari, Sandeep
    Jamal, Syed Babar
    Ferreira, Rafaela Salgado
    Barh, Debmalya
    Ghosh, Preetam
    Silva, Artur
    Azevedo, Vasco
    CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE, 2015, 16 (08) : 689 - 700
  • [30] A protein docking method based on the process of protein-protein association
    Vajda, S
    Camacho, CJ
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 82 (01) : 472A - 472A