Neonatal Screening: Cost-utility Analysis for Galactosemia

被引:0
|
作者
Hatam, Nahid [1 ]
Askarian, Mehrdad [2 ]
Shirvani, Samad [3 ]
Siavashi, Elham [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Management & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Community Med, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Res Comm, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Economic evaluation; Cost-utility analysis; Newborn screening; Galactosemia; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; NEWBORN; PROGRAM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Galactosemia is a congenital metabolic disorder that can damage the health of a newborn. Screening is an important step to prevent and treat this condition. Due to increasing health care costs and limited financial resources of health systems, the most suitable economic analysis tool should be applied. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-utility of neonatal screening program for diagnosing galactosemia in Fars province, Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study and cost-utility analysis in the cost of screening for galactosemia and its financial effects, decision tree model and society's viewpoint were used. The population of study was 81837 infants referred to Neonatal Screening Laboratory (Nader Kazemi Clinic) affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Iran, in 2010. Quality of life in two groups of patients was evaluated by using the time trade-off. The best intervention option was selected by using the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio. Results: The estimated cost of diagnosed through screening and without screening were 43519911 and 130011168 Iranian Rails (4222.00 $ and 12615.00 $), respectively. Therefore, there was a saving of 201443240.99 Iranian Rails (19641.00 $), for each patient annually. Conclusion: The screening program can improve both the qualitative and quantitative lifestyle of people and increase savings in health care system. Policymakers could use the results to design new policies based on the necessity of screening.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-utility analysis in schizophrenia
    Awad, AG
    Voruganti, LP
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 60 : 22 - 28
  • [22] Cost-utility analysis - Response
    Neumann, PJ
    Chapman, RH
    Stone, PW
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (07) : 626 - 626
  • [23] Cost-utility analysis and otolaryngology
    Hamilton, D.
    Hulme, C.
    Flood, L.
    Powell, S.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2014, 128 (02): : 112 - 118
  • [24] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSAL NEONATAL SCREENING FOR CRITICAL CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE BASED ON PULSE OXIMETRY IN SPAIN
    Imaz-Iglesia, I.
    Hijas-Gomez, A., I
    Rodriguez-Arbaizar, J.
    Martinez-Portillo, A.
    Asensio, C.
    Carpintero, Garcia E.
    Saborido, C.
    Carmona, M.
    Bayon, J. C.
    Gutierrez-Larraya, F.
    Sanchez-Luna, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S110 - S110
  • [25] Cost-utility of repeated screening for chlamydia trachomatis
    de Vries, Robin
    van Bergen, Jan E. A. M.
    de Jong-van den Berg, Lolkje T. W.
    Postma, Maarten J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (02) : 272 - 274
  • [26] The cost-utility of screening for depression in primary care
    Valenstein, M
    Vijan, S
    Zeber, JE
    Boehm, K
    Buttar, A
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (05) : 345 - 360
  • [27] Cost-utility of repeated screening for Chlamydia trachomatis
    De Vries, R.
    Van Bergen, Jeam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 16 : 25 - 25
  • [28] Cost-Utility Analysis of von Willebrand Disease Screening in Adolescents with Menorrhagia
    Sidonio, Robert Francis, Jr.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    Ragni, Margaret V.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2010, 157 (03): : 456 - U143
  • [29] Cost-utility analysis of expanding the colorectal cancer screening policy in Flanders
    Lelie, M.
    Parmentier, R.
    Simoens, S.
    Annemans, L.
    Putman, K.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 231 : 142 - 147
  • [30] Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A computer assisted cost-utility analysis
    StLeger, AS
    Spencely, M
    McCollum, CN
    Mossa, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 11 (02) : 183 - 190