Effect of delay on search decisions in a task-oriented reading environment

被引:9
|
作者
Mana, Amelia [1 ]
Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo [1 ]
Salmeron, Ladislao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Psicol, ERI Lectura, Ave Blasco Ibanez 21, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
Metacomprehension accuracy; Self-regulated reading; Task-oriented reading; Individual differences; METACOMPREHENSION ACCURACY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; LITERACY SKILLS; COMPREHENSION; TEXT; JUDGMENTS; REPRESENTATION; ACCESSIBILITY; HYPOTHESES; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11409-016-9162-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to determine the effect of setting a delay between reading a text and answering comprehension questions on when-to-search and what-to-search decisions in a task-oriented reading environment. Fifty-five eighth-grade students were randomly divided into two groups. One group read one text, answered comprehension questions regarding the text with the text available, and subsequently repeated the procedure with a second text (immediate condition). The other group read both texts first and then answered, with the texts available, the questions for the first text and then for the second text (delayed condition). In both conditions, the readers' actions during the task were recorded. The results demonstrated that the students in the delayed condition made more search decisions. In addition, moderated mediation analyses indicated that setting a delay had a positive indirect effect on performance via increased searching only for the students with average and high comprehension skills. Moreover, decisions regarding what information to search for depended exclusively on comprehension skill. Instructional implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 130
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ‘Supporting socially shared regulation during collaborative task-oriented reading’
    Jolique Kielstra
    Inge Molenaar
    Roel van Steensel
    Ludo Verhoeven
    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2022, 17 : 65 - 105
  • [22] Individual Differences for Self-Regulating Task-Oriented Reading Activities
    Vidal Abarca, Eduardo
    Mana, Amelia
    Gil, Laura
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 102 (04) : 817 - 826
  • [23] Design of A Task-Oriented Autonomous Wheeled-Robot for Search and Rescue
    Priandana, Karlisa
    Hardhienata, Medria
    Choironi, M. Iqbal
    Pawitra, Rakean G. D.
    Wulandari
    Wahjuni, Sri
    Buono, Agus
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICACSIS), 2018, : 259 - 263
  • [24] The effects of co-operation on multiagent search in task-oriented domains
    Vidal, JM
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, 16 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [25] A TASK-ORIENTED LUNCH GROUP
    FULLILOVE, M
    HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY, 1984, 35 (10): : 1078 - 1078
  • [26] A survey of task-oriented crowdsourcing
    Nuno Luz
    Nuno Silva
    Paulo Novais
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2015, 44 : 187 - 213
  • [27] Task-oriented learning on the Web
    Whittington, CD
    Campbell, LM
    INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 36 (01): : 26 - 33
  • [28] Modelling "but" in task-oriented dialogue
    Thomas, KE
    MODELING AND USING CONTEXT, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2680 : 314 - 327
  • [29] Modeling Task-Oriented Dialogue
    Maite Taboada
    Computers and the Humanities, 2003, 37 : 431 - 454
  • [30] Task-Oriented Clustering for Dialogues
    Lv, Chenxu
    Lu, Hengtong
    Lei, Shuyu
    Jiang, Huixing
    Wu, Wei
    Yuan, Caixia
    Wang, Xiaojie
    FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, EMNLP 2021, 2021, : 4338 - 4347