Predicting population dynamics of weed biological control agents: science or gazing into crystal balls?

被引:55
|
作者
Zalucki, Myron P. [1 ]
van Klinken, Rieks D.
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Integrat Biol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Entomol & Cooperat Res Ctr Australian Weed Manage, Long Pocket Labs, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia
来源
关键词
biogeography; climate; CLIMEX; day degrees; modelling; phenology;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-6055.2006.00560.x
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Various factors can influence the population dynamics of phytophages post introduction, of which climate is fundamental. Here we present an approach, using a mechanistic modelling package (CLIMEX), that at least enables one to make predictions of likely dynamics based on climate alone. As biological control programs will have minimal funding for basic work (particularly on population dynamics), we show how predictions can be made using a species geographical distribution, relative abundance across its range, seasonal phenology and laboratory rearing data. Many of these data sets are more likely to be available than long-term population data, and some can be incorporated into the exploratory phase of a biocontrol program. Although models are likely to be more robust the more information is available, useful models can be developed using information on species distribution alone. The fitted model estimates a species average response to climate, and can be used to predict likely geographical distribution if introduced, where the agent is likely to be more abundant (i.e. good locations) and more importantly for interpretation of release success, the likely variation in abundance over time due to intra- and inter-year climate variability. The latter will be useful in predicting both the seasonal and long-term impacts of the potential biocontrol agent on the target weed. We believe this tool may not only aid in the agent selection process, but also in the design of release strategies, and for interpretation of post-introduction dynamics and impacts. More importantly we are making testable predictions. If biological control is to become more of a science making and testing such hypothesis will be a key component.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 344
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting the determinants of weed abundance:: a model for the population dynamics of Chenopodium album in sugar beet
    Freckleton, RP
    Watkinson, AR
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1998, 35 (06) : 904 - 920
  • [22] The influence of two wildfires and biological control agents on the population dynamics of Melaleuca quinquenervia in a seasonally inundated wetland
    Tipping, Philip W.
    Martin, Melissa R.
    Foley, Jeremiah R.
    Pierce, Ryan M.
    Gettys, Lyn A.
    INVASIVE PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [23] Scientific advances in the analysis of direct risks of weed biological control agents to nontarget plants
    Sheppard, AW
    van Klinken, RD
    Heard, TA
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2005, 35 (03) : 215 - 226
  • [24] Soilborne microorganisms of Euphorbia are potential biological control agents of the invasive weed leafy spurge
    Kremer, RJ
    Caesar, AJ
    Souissi, T
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2006, 32 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [25] Acute toxicity of mosquito pesticides on weed biological control agents in south Florida, USA
    Wheeler, Gregory S.
    Lake, Ellen C.
    Rayamajhi, Min B.
    Smith, Melissa C.
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (08) : 855 - 861
  • [26] Influence of row spacing and weed control methods on weed population dynamics in soybean (Glycine maxL.)
    Daramola, Olumide Samuel
    Adeyemi, Olusegun Rapheal
    Adigun, Joseph Aremu
    Adejuyigbe, Christopher Olu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2022, 68 (01) : 43 - 58
  • [27] European ectoparasitoids of two classical weed biological control agents released in North America
    Muller, Franck J.
    Mason, Peter G.
    Dosdall, Lloyd M.
    Kuhlmann, Ulrich
    CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 2011, 143 (02): : 197 - 210
  • [28] Post-release genetic assessment of two congeneric weed biological control agents
    Keever, Carson C.
    Gultekin, Levent
    Bourchier, Robert S.
    Myers, Judith H.
    Cory, Jenny S.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2021, 152
  • [29] Host shifts in biological weed control: Real problems, semantic difficulties or poor science?
    Marohasy, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 1996, 42 (02) : 71 - 75
  • [30] A glimpse into the compatibilities and conflicts between arthropods and fungal biological control agents of aquatic weed waterhyacinth
    Dutta, Writuparna
    Ray, Puja
    PHYTOPARASITICA, 2017, 45 (03) : 429 - 437