Pollution and parasitism in aquatic animals: A meta-analysis of effect size

被引:142
|
作者
Blanar, Christopher A. [1 ]
Munkittrick, Kelly R. [1 ]
Houlahan, Jeff [1 ]
MacLatchy, Deborah L. [2 ]
Marcogliese, David J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Biol, Canadian Rivers Inst, St John, NB E2L 4L5, Canada
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Biol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
[3] St Lawrence Ctr, Environm Canada, Sci & Technol Branch,Fluvial Ecosyst Res Sect, Aquat Ecosyst Protect Res Div,Water Sci & Technol, Montreal, PQ H2Y 2E7, Canada
关键词
Pollution; Parasites; Effect size; Meta-analysis; Biological indicators; ROACH RUTILUS-RUTILUS; DIPLOSTOMUM-SPATHACEUM TREMATODA; BIRD FINAL HOSTS; FRESH-WATER FISH; PARASITOLOGICAL INDEXES; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; MARINE ECOSYSTEMS; ZINC MIXTURES; MILL EFFLUENT; NOVA-SCOTIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.03.002
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Numerous studies have indicated that aquatic pollution affects parasite populations and communities. However, the responses of individual taxa and functional groups to specific contaminants, and their effect sizes, have yet to be assessed quantitatively. We began by summarizing general trends in the literature, and found that reports of significant changes in parasitism were most commonly observed in response to eutrophication and metal contamination. Among parasite taxa, significant changes were most commonly reported for acanthocephalans, digeneans and microparasites. We then conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of the effects of pollution on parasitism in aquatic animals. We calculated signed standardized effect sizes (as Cohen's d) for all published studies that provided the necessary descriptive statistics, and compared them among major contaminant types (pesticides, hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, pulp mill effluent, metals, sewage, eutrophication. and acidification) and parasite taxa (Acanthocephala, Cestoda, Digenea, Monogenea, Nematoda and micro parasites). Effect sizes were not significantly different from zero for many parasite/contaminant interactions, and tended to be highly variable within individual taxa. However, consistently strong, significant negative effects were noted in Digenea and Monogenea, especially in response to metal pollution. Significant effect sizes were typically negative, indicating that pollutants have negative effects on parasite populations. Contaminants also had a slightly negative effect on community richness. When parasites were grouped into heteroxenous (with >1 obligatory host in life cycle) vs. monoxenous (1 obligatory host in life cycle) taxa, the latter were more susceptible to a wide range of pollutants. Similarly, directly exposed (external parasites and the free-living transmission stages of internal parasites) and freshwater taxa were more susceptible to a wider range of pollutants than indirectly exposed (internal parasites) and marine taxa. This meta-analysis represented a first attempt to consider the size of the effect of pollution on parasites, and highlighted the potential of susceptible parasite taxa, communities, and functional groups for use in the biological assessment of pollution. For instance, our results indicate that freshwater monogeneans and digeneans are good candidates as potential biological indicators of pollution in aquatic ecosystems. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 28
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comments on the selection of effect model and effect size in a meta-analysis
    Wu, Jiangfeng
    Zhao, Anli
    Ge, Lifang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (01) : 450 - 451
  • [22] INFLUENCE OF POLLUTION ON PARASITES OF AQUATIC ANIMALS
    KHAN, RA
    THULIN, J
    ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY, 1991, 30 : 201 - 238
  • [23] Co-culture of rice and aquatic animals enhances soil organic carbon: A meta-analysis
    Li, Sixian
    Li, Wenbo
    Ding, Kexin
    Shi, Xinyi
    Kalkhajeh, Yusef Kianpoor
    Wei, Zhengyu
    Zhang, Zhen
    Ma, Chao
    Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 955
  • [24] Determining "Significance" Using Effect Size and Meta-Analysis
    Boiarskaia, Elena
    Park, Youngsik
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2010, 81 (01) : 7 - 7
  • [25] The Effect of Legislature Size on Public Spending: A Meta-Analysis
    Freire, Danilo
    Mignozzetti, Umberto
    Roman, Catarina
    Alptekin, Huzeyfe
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 53 (02) : 776 - 788
  • [26] Estimation of the effect size in meta-analysis with few studies
    Longford, Nicholas T.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (04) : 421 - 430
  • [27] The Effect Size of Variables Associated With Creativity: A Meta-Analysis
    Ma, Hsen-Hsing
    CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 21 (01) : 30 - 42
  • [28] A NONPARAMETRIC TECHNIQUE FOR META-ANALYSIS EFFECT SIZE CALCULATION
    KRAEMER, HC
    ANDREWS, G
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 91 (02) : 404 - 412
  • [29] The effect of river restoration on fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes: A meta-analysis
    Kail, Jochem
    Brabec, Karel
    Poppe, Michaela
    Januschke, Kathrin
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 58 : 311 - 321
  • [30] Effect of the plastic pollutant bisphenol A on the biology of aquatic organisms: A meta-analysis
    Wu, Nicholas C.
    Seebacher, Frank
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (07) : 3821 - 3833