A large dataset for the evaluation of ontology matching

被引:19
|
作者
Giunchiglia, Fausto [1 ]
Yatskevich, Mikalai [1 ]
Avesani, Paolo [2 ]
Shivaiko, Pavel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trent, Dept Informat Engn & Comp Sci DISI, I-38050 Trento, Italy
[2] Fdn Bruno Kessler, I-38050 Trento, Italy
来源
KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW | 2009年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
SEMANTIC-INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1017/S026988890900023X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recently, the number of ontology matching techniques and systems has increased significantly. This makes the Issue of their evaluation and comparison more severe. One or the challenges of the ontology matching evaluation is in building large-scale evaluation datasets. In fact, the number of possible correspondences between two ontologies grows quadratically with respect to the numbers of entities in these ontologies. This often makes the manual construction of the evaluation datasets demanding to the point of being infeasible for large-scale matching tasks. In this paper, we present an ontology matching evaluation dataset composed of thousands of matching tasks, called TaxME2. It was built semi-automatically out of the Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart web directories. We evaluated TaxME2 by exploiting the results of almost two-dozen of state-of-the-art ontology matching systems. The experiments indicate that the dataset possesses the desired key properties, namely it is error-free, incremental, discriminative,e, monotonic, and hard for the state-of-the-art ontology matching systems.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 157
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation Method, Dataset Size or Dataset Content: How to Evaluate Algorithms for Image Matching?
    Nadia Kanwal
    Erkan Bostanci
    Adrian F. Clark
    Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2016, 55 : 378 - 400
  • [22] Matching disease and phenotype ontologies in the ontology alignment evaluation initiative
    Ian Harrow
    Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
    Andrea Splendiani
    Martin Romacker
    Peter Woollard
    Scott Markel
    Yasmin Alam-Faruque
    Martin Koch
    James Malone
    Arild Waaler
    Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 8
  • [23] Uncertainty in Automated Ontology Matching: Lessons from an Empirical Evaluation
    Osman, Ines
    Pileggi, Salvatore Flavio
    Yahia, Sadok Ben
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [24] Automatic Ontology Matching via Upper Ontologies: A Systematic Evaluation
    Mascardi, Viviana
    Locoro, Angela
    Rosso, Paolo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2010, 22 (05) : 609 - 623
  • [25] Evaluation of multistrategy classifiers for heterogeneous ontology matching on the semantic web
    Pan, L.-Y. (pan-ly@cs.sjfu.edu.cn), 2005, Editorial Board of Journal of Dong Hua University (22):
  • [26] Matching disease and phenotype ontologies in the ontology alignment evaluation initiative
    Harrow, Ian
    Jimenez-Ruiz, Ernesto
    Splendiani, Andrea
    Romacker, Martin
    Woollard, Peter
    Markel, Scott
    Alam-Faruque, Yasmin
    Koch, Martin
    Malone, James
    Waaler, Arild
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SEMANTICS, 2017, 8
  • [27] RGB-Multispectral Matching: Dataset, Learning Methodology, Evaluation
    Tosi, Fabio
    Ramirez, Pierluigi Zama
    Poggi, Matteo
    Salti, Samuele
    Mattoccia, Stefano
    Di Stefano, Luigi
    2022 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2022), 2022, : 15937 - 15947
  • [28] A segment-based approach for large-scale ontology matching
    Xingsi Xue
    Jeng-Shyang Pan
    Knowledge and Information Systems, 2017, 52 : 467 - 484
  • [29] A Clustering-Based Approach for Large-Scale Ontology Matching
    Algergawy, Alsayed
    Massmann, Sabine
    Rahm, Erhard
    ADVANCES IN DATABASES AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 6909 : 415 - 428
  • [30] A segment-based approach for large-scale ontology matching
    Xue, Xingsi
    Pan, Jeng-Shyang
    KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 52 (02) : 467 - 484