Measures of success: Prediction of successful labor induction

被引:17
|
作者
Gibson, Kelly S. [1 ]
Waters, Thaddeus P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
Induction of labor; Cervical ripening; Bishop score; Parity; Estimated fetal weight; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; CESAREAN DELIVERY; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; RISK; PROGRESSION; MACROSOMIA; PREGNANCY; PATTERNS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Ideally, all pregnant women would enter labor spontaneously at the safest time to yield the best health outcomes for both themselves and their newboms. Unfortunately, this does not always happen and leaves obstetric providers weighing the maternal and fetal risks of continued expectant management versus labor induction. Several elements have been reported to affect the success rate of an induction, including the Bishop score, matemal parity, body mass index (BMI), age, medical comorbidities, fetal gestational age, and estimated weight, as well as the hospital site and provider practice. Recent data suggest that the decision to induce or continue expectant management in anticipation of labor is an important variable in determining whether a woman has a safe and successful delivery. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 482
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of success of labor induction in very unfavorable cervix: comparison of 6 scores.
    Tollon, Pauline
    Blanc-Petitjean, Pauline
    Drumez, Elodie
    Re, Louise Ghesquie
    Le Ray, Camille
    Garabedian, Charles
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S477 - S478
  • [22] Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography
    Pereira, S.
    Frick, A. P.
    Poon, L. C.
    Zamprakou, A.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 44 (04) : 468 - 475
  • [23] Cervical and Lower Uterine Parameter Ultrasound and Elastographic Parameters for the Prediction of a Successful Induction of Labor
    Hamza, Amr
    Radosa, Julia
    Gerlinger, Christoph
    Solomayer, Erich Franz
    Stroeder, Russalina
    Meyberg-Solomayer, Gabriele
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2021, 42 (05): : 520 - 528
  • [24] Diagnostic accuracy of posterior cervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor
    Al-Adwy, Akram M.
    Sobh, Sherin M.
    Belal, Doaa S.
    Omran, Eman F.
    Hassan, Amr
    Saad, Ahmed H.
    Afifi, Mai M.
    Nada, Adel M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 141 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [25] Validation and improvement of an induction of labor success calculator
    Wang, Dawei David
    Sisti, Giovanni
    McWhirter, Amanda
    Winget, Veronica
    Manninen, Ethan
    Rivera, Camilla A.
    Ziller, Shelby
    Borgstrom, Mark
    Guinn, Debra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S413 - S414
  • [26] Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels and success of labor induction
    Kimya, Y
    Ozerkan, K
    Karabay, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 86 (01) : 33 - 34
  • [27] Influence of maternal Obesity on the Success of Labor Induction
    Kehl, S.
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2019, 52 (04): : 248 - 248
  • [28] Transvaginal cervical length measurement and Bishop score in the prediction of successful induction of labor in postterm pregnancy
    Uygur, Dilek
    Erdinc, Ayse Seval
    Mollamahmutoglu, Leyla
    Mungan, Tamer
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 3 (02) : 89 - 92
  • [29] Factors associated with successful elective induction of labor
    Njie, Suna
    Xu, Fei
    Kuzniewicz, Michael
    Hedderson, Monique
    Greenberg, Mara
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S295 - S295
  • [30] Does Leptin Predict Successful Induction of Labor?
    Cowman, Whitney
    Scroggins, Sabrina
    Santillan, Mark
    Santillan, Donna
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 23 : 81A - 81A