The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Pain Intensity and Neck Disability for Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Neck and Shoulder A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:17
|
作者
Jun, Ji Hyun [1 ,4 ]
Park, Geun-Young [2 ]
Chae, Choong Sik [3 ]
Suh, Dong-Churl [4 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv, Wonju, Gangwondo, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Bucheon St Marys Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Cheonan Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil Med, Cheonan, Chungcheongnamd, South Korea
[4] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Pharm, 84 Heuksuk Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy; Myofascial Pain Syndrome; Pain; Disability; Meta-analysis; EFFICACY; METAANALYSIS; MUSCLE;
D O I
10.1097/PHM.0000000000001493
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on myofascial pain syndrome in the neck and shoulder compared with that of other treatments. Data Sources PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched until May 30, 2019, to select randomized controlled trials. Review Methods The randomized controlled trials comparing extracorporeal shock wave therapy with sham extracorporeal shock wave therapy or other treatments for patients with myofascial pain syndrome in the neck and shoulder patients were included. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies. The Cochrane Handbook was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials. Main outcomes associated with pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and neck disability were selected. The study was registered with PROSPERO (Registration Number CRD 42019137459). Results A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were finally included. The results indicated that extracorporeal shock wave therapy had a large effect size on improving pain intensity (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.11 to 1.23, P = 0.02) and pressure pain threshold (SMD = 1.19, 95% confidence interval = 0.27 to l2.12, P = 0.01) at postintervention. However, there was no significant effect on neck disability at postintervention (SMD = 0.03, 95% confidence interval = -0.76 to 0.83, P = 0.93). After the subgroup analyses on the type of extracorporeal shock wave therapy, focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy had a significant effect on improving pain intensity (SMD = 0.75, 95% confidence interval = 0.13 to 1.36, P = 0.02) and pressure pain threshold (SMD = 1.70, 95% confidence interval = 0.21 to 3.18, P = 0.03) at postintervention in comparison with that of other treatments. Conclusions Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is superior to other treatments in terms of alleviating the pain intensity and pressure pain threshold of patients with myofascial pain syndrome in the neck and shoulder at postintervention. In particular, focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows significant improvement in pain relief. However, radical extracorporeal shock wave therapy for myofascial pain syndrome treatment still remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 129
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapies in Patients with Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Gur, Ali
    Koca, Irfan
    Karagullu, Hilal
    Altindag, Ozlem
    Madenci, Ercan
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN, 2013, 21 (03): : 210 - 216
  • [22] Effect of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Syndrome
    Kim, Sung Hwan
    Ha, Kang Wook
    Kim, Yun Hee
    Seol, Pyong-Hwa
    Kwak, Ho-Jun
    Park, Seung-Wan
    Ryu, Byung-Ju
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2016, 40 (03): : 509 - 519
  • [23] Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for shoulder pain after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Tingyu
    Zhang, Cai
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 37 (06) : 774 - 790
  • [24] Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with tennis elbow A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zheng, Chenxiao
    Zeng, Dongjie
    Chen, Jiayi
    Liu, Sijing
    Li, Jianyi
    Ruan, Zhaohai
    Liang, Wusheng
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (30) : E21189
  • [25] Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kong, Ling Jun
    Zhan, Hong Sheng
    Cheng, Ying Wu
    Yuan, Wei An
    Chen, Bo
    Fang, Min
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 2013
  • [26] Efficacy of music therapy for pain control of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Lei, Ming
    Li, Guangquan
    Tang, Yizhi
    Yuan, Jinlong
    Yang, Tao
    Gao, Zhiyong
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (22) : E38182
  • [27] Commentary: Traditional Chinese exercises on pain and disability in middle-aged and elderly patients with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cao, Zhejia
    Li, Zhiliang
    Lu, Qiqi
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 15
  • [28] Effects of Kinesio Taping on Neck Pain: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hu, Qian
    Liu, Ying
    Yin, Shao
    Zou, Hui
    Shi, Houyin
    Zhu, Fengya
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2024, 13 (05) : 1031 - 1046
  • [29] Traditional Chinese Mind and Body Exercises for Neck Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xie, Yu-Hua
    Liao, Man-Xia
    Wang, Mao-Yuan
    Fernando, W. C. Hewith A.
    Gu, Yue-Ming
    Wang, Xue-Qiang
    Liao, Lin-Rong
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 2021
  • [30] Effect of education on non-specific neck and low back pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hurley, John
    O'Keeffe, Mary
    O'Sullivan, Peter
    Ryan, Cormac
    McCreesh, Karen
    O'Sullivan, Kieran
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2016, 23 : E1 - E2