Pinniped phylogenetic relationships inferred using AFLP markers

被引:36
|
作者
Dasmahapatra, K. K. [1 ]
Hoffman, J. I. [2 ]
Amos, W. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Biol, Galton Lab, London NW1 2HE, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
AFLP; pinniped; phylogeny; molecular clock; amplified fragment length polymorphism; HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY; FEMALE PHILOPATRY; SINGLE ORIGIN; DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL; POPULATION; NUCLEAR; EVOLUTION; CARNIVORA; INTROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1038/hdy.2009.25
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) are widely used for phylogenetic reconstruction in plants but their use in animal taxa has been limited, and in mammals rare. In addition, their use has been largely limited to shallow relationships amongst species or subspecies. Here, we genotype 23 pinniped species for 310 AFLP markers and find a strong phylogenetic signal, with individuals coclustering within species, and overall a good agreement between our phylogeny and those constructed using mitochondrial DNA and nuclear sequences even at nodes similar to 15 million years old. Although supporting the existing ideas about pinniped relationships, our data shed light on relationships within the hitherto relatively unresolved Phocine species group, and provide further supporting evidence for raising two subspecies of Zalophus californianus, Z. c. californianus and Z. c. wollebaeki, to species level. Plotting AFLP divergence time estimates against those based on both mtDNA and nuclear sequences we find strong linear relationships, suggesting that the different markers are evolving in a clocklike fashion. These data further emphasize the utility of AFLP markers as general tools for phylogenetic reconstruction. Heredity ( 2009) 103, 168-177; doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.25; published online 11 March 2009
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 177
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic relationships among Pistacia species using AFLP markers
    Karimi, Hamid Reza
    Kafkas, Salih
    Zamani, Zabihallah
    Ebadi, Ali
    Moghadam, Mohamad Reza Fatahi
    PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 2009, 279 (1-4) : 21 - 28
  • [22] Genetic Relationships among Pistachio Species Using AFLP Markers
    Karimi, H. R.
    Kafkas, S.
    Zamani, Z.
    Ebadi, A.
    Fatahi, R.
    V INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PISTACHIOS AND ALMONDS, 2011, 912 : 617 - 627
  • [23] Determination of phylogenetic relationships between some wild wheat species using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers
    Gulbitti-Onarici, Selma
    Sumer, Sibel
    Ozcan, Sebahattin
    BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2007, 153 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [24] Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Pistacia by AFLP markers
    S. Kafkas
    Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2006, 262 : 113 - 124
  • [25] Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Pistacia by AFLP markers
    Kafkas, S.
    PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 2006, 262 (1-2) : 113 - 124
  • [26] Phylogenetic relationships within and between Epichloe and Neotyphodium endophytes as estimated by AFLP markers and rDNA sequences
    Tredway, LP
    White, JF
    Gaut, BS
    Reddy, PV
    Richardson, MD
    Clarke, BB
    MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 103 : 1593 - 1603
  • [27] Phylogenetic relationships and genetic diversity of landrace populations of thyme (Thymus spp.) of Iran using AFLP markers and GC–MS
    Babak Rabiei
    Mohaddese Rastjoo
    Alireza Aliakbar
    Mojtaba Kordrostami
    Brazilian Journal of Botany, 2019, 42 : 613 - 621
  • [28] Phylogenetic relationships among rhabdoviruses inferred using the L polymerase gene
    Bourhy, H
    Cowley, JA
    Larrous, F
    Holmes, EC
    Walker, PJ
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 2005, 86 : 2849 - 2858
  • [29] Analysis of genetic diversity and sectional relationships in Musa using AFLP markers
    Ude, G
    Pillay, M
    Nwakanma, D
    Tenkouano, A
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2002, 104 (08) : 1239 - 1245
  • [30] Assessment of genetic relationships in durum wheat cultivars using AFLP markers
    Aytül Incirli
    Mahinur S. Akkaya
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2001, 48 : 233 - 238