A Matching-Integration-Verification Model for Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension

被引:0
|
作者
Xing, Luxi [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Yuqiang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chunhui [3 ]
Hu, Yong [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Informat Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Cyber Secur, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Effy Intelligent Technol Beijing Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine reading comprehension; Multiple-choice; Attention;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-55393-7_21
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multiple-choice reading comprehension is a challenging task requiring a machine to select the correct answer from a candidate answers set. In this paper, we propose a model following a matching-integration-verification-prediction framework, which explicitly employs a verification module inspired by the human being and generates judgment of each option simultaneously according to the evidence information and the verified information. The verification module, which is responsible for recheck information from matching, can selectively combine matched information from the passage and option instead of transmitting them equally to prediction. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed model achieves significant improvement on several multiple-choice reading comprehension benchmark datasets.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 237
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using Sentence-Level Neural Network Models for Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Tasks
    Wang, Yuanlong
    Li, Ru
    Zhang, Hu
    Tan, Hongyan
    Chai, Qinghua
    WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING, 2018,
  • [32] Preliminary Findings on the Computer-Administered Multiple-Choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment, a Diagnostic Reading Comprehension Test
    Davison, Mark L.
    Biancarosa, Gina
    Carlson, Sarah E.
    Seipel, Ben
    Liu, Bowen
    ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2018, 43 (03) : 169 - 181
  • [33] COMPARABLE CLOZE AND MULTIPLE-CHOICE COMPREHENSION TEST SCORES
    BORMUTH, JR
    JOURNAL OF READING, 1967, 10 (05): : 291 - 299
  • [34] COMPARABLE CLOZE AND MULTIPLE-CHOICE COMPREHENSION TEST SCORES
    RANKIN, EF
    CULHANE, JW
    JOURNAL OF READING, 1969, 13 (03): : 193 - 198
  • [35] DELUSIONS ABOUT PERFORMANCE ON MULTIPLE-CHOICE COMPREHENSION TESTS
    PRESSLEY, M
    GHATALA, ES
    READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1988, 23 (04) : 454 - 464
  • [36] Using working memory theory to investigate the construct validity of multiple-choice reading comprehension tests such as the SAT
    Daneman, M
    Hannon, B
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2001, 130 (02) : 208 - 223
  • [37] Enhancing Lexical-Based Approach With External Knowledge for Vietnamese Multiple-Choice Machine Reading Comprehension
    Nguyen, Kiet Van
    Tran, Khiem Vinh
    Luu, Son T.
    Nguyen, Anh Gia-Tuan
    Nguyen, Ngan Luu-Thuy
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 201404 - 201417
  • [38] Difficulty-Controllable Multiple-Choice Question Generation for Reading Comprehension Using Item Response Theory
    Tomikawa, Yuto
    Uto, Masaki
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: POSTERS AND LATE BREAKING RESULTS, WORKSHOPS AND TUTORIALS, INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION TRACKS, PRACTITIONERS, DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM AND BLUE SKY, AIED 2024, PT I, 2024, 2150 : 312 - 320
  • [39] ElimiNet: A Model for Eliminating Options for Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questions
    Parikh, Soham
    Sai, Ananya B.
    Nema, Preksha
    Khapra, Mitesh M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 4272 - 4278
  • [40] Assessing the validity of multiple-choice questions for RAPP story comprehension
    Fossett, TRD
    McNeil, MR
    Doyle, PJ
    Rubinsky, H
    Nixon, S
    Hula, W
    Brady, J
    APHASIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (5-7) : 493 - 519