Comment on "Pulsating Auroras Produced by Interactions of Electrons and Time Domain Structures" by Mozer Et Al. Reply

被引:2
|
作者
Mozer, F. S. [1 ]
Hull, A. [1 ]
Lejosne, S. [1 ]
Vasko, I. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Space Sci Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
time domain structures cause electron precipitation in pulsating auroras; chorus cannot precipitate electrons observed in pulsating auroras; OUTER RADIATION BELT; ELECTROSTATIC SOLITARY WAVES; DOUBLE-LAYERS; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; MAGNETIC-FIELD; WHISTLER WAVES; ACCELERATION; INSTABILITIES; GENERATION; SATELLITE;
D O I
10.1002/2018JA025218
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Nishimura et al. (2010, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193186,2011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016876, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA018242), and in their comment, hereafter called N18) have suggested that chorus waves interact with equatorial electrons to produce pulsating auroras. We agree that chorus can scatter electrons >10keV, as do Time Domain Structures (TDSs). Lower-energy electrons occurring in pulsating auroras cannot be produced by chorus, but such electrons are scattered and accelerated by TDS. TDSs often occur with chorus and have power in their spectra at chorus frequencies. Thus, the absence of power at low frequencies is not evidence that TDSs are absent, as an example shows. Through examination of equatorial electric field waveforms and electron pitch angle distributions measured on the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms satellites (in place of examining field and particle spectra, as done by Nishimura et al.), we show that chorus cannot produce the field-aligned electrons associated with pulsating auroras in the Nishimura et al. (2010, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193186)) events, but TDSs can. Equatorial field-aligned electron distributions associated with pulsating auroras and created by TDS in the absence of chorus or any other wave at the equator are also shown.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2077
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Authors' reply to the comment by Shan et al.
    Beilstein, Christian M.
    Huber, Markus
    Engel, Dominique
    Wuethrich, Patrick Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 27 (04) : 548 - 549
  • [32] Authors' reply to the comment by Zhu et al.
    Stove, Morten Pallisgaard
    Hansen, Line orum
    Elmbaek, Kristian Kloppenborg
    Magnusson, Stig Peter
    Thomsen, Janus Laust
    Riis, Allan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [33] Comment on the paper by Freitas et al. Reply
    Freitas, Paulo Fontoura
    Moreira, Bianca Carvalho
    Manoel, Andre Luciano
    de Albuquerque Botura, Ana Clara
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2015, 31 (09): : 1854 - 1855
  • [34] Reply to the comment made by Aubourg et al.
    Herrero-Bervera, E
    Cañon-Tapia, E
    Walker, GPL
    JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2003, 122 (1-2) : 145 - 148
  • [35] Reply to Frizzell et al.'s comment to our comment
    Apfel, RE
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 110 (04): : 1740 - 1741
  • [36] Comment on "Colloidal Interactions and Transport in Nematic Liquid Crystals" -: Tatarkova et al. reply
    Tatarkova, S. A.
    Burnham, D. R.
    Kirby, A. K.
    Love, G. D.
    Terentjev, E. M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2008, 101 (02)
  • [37] Reply to comments by Sandweiss et al., on "Comment on Arnold et al. (2021): CP in the MCA?"
    Arnold, T. Elliott
    Hillman, Aubrey L.
    Abbott, Mark B.
    Werne, Josef P.
    McGrath, Steven J.
    Arkush, Elizabeth N.
    QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2021, 269
  • [38] Reply to the comment by Dr. Spronk et al.
    Berra, Lorenzo
    Kolobow, Theodor
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 32 (12) : 2082 - 2083
  • [39] Reply to the comment by Dr. Spronk et al.
    Lorenzo Berra
    Theodor Kolobow
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2006, 32 : 2082 - 2083
  • [40] Reply to the comment by Dr. Maliaga et al.
    Jubran, Amal
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 33 (04) : 741 - 741