Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up

被引:54
|
作者
Lee, Sang-Ho [1 ]
Erken, H. Yener [2 ]
Bae, Junseok [1 ]
机构
[1] Spine Hlth Wooridul Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Spine Hlth Wooridul Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ARTHRODESIS; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY; DISKS;
D O I
10.1155/2017/3731983
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background. Spinal fusion has been shown to be the preferred surgical option to reduce pain, recover function, and increase quality of life in the treatment of a variety of lumbar spinal disorders. The main goal of the present study is to report our clinical experience and results of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) applications using the expandable spacer in a single institution. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 18 patients with > 12-month follow-up who had been operated on PELIF using expandable spacer from 2001 to 2007. Their clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Results. The mean follow-up period was 46 months. The mean DH before the surgery was 8.3mm which improved to 11.4mm at the early postoperative period and regressed to 9.3mm at the last follow-up visit. The VAS-B, VAS-L, and ODI scores at the last follow-up showed a 54%, 72%, and 69% improvement fromthe preoperative period, respectively. Conclusions. The presented PELIF technique with the expandable spacer seems to be a promising surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of lumbar spinal disorders. Conversely, radiological results including disc space subsidence make the stand-alone application of the expandable spacer debatable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ge, Meng
    Zhang, Yuan
    Ying, Hang
    Feng, Chenchen
    Li, Yanlei
    Tian, Jinlong
    Zhao, Tingxiao
    Shao, Haiyu
    Huang, Yazeng
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 46 (09) : 2063 - 2070
  • [12] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Viable Allograft: 75 Consecutive Cases at 12-Month Follow-up
    Tally, William C.
    Temple, H. Thomas
    Subhawong, T. Y.
    Ganey, Timothy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 12 (01): : 76 - 84
  • [13] Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine
    Audat, Z.
    Moutasem, O.
    Yousef, K.
    Mohammad, B.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [14] Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up
    Dhall, Sanjay S.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (06) : 560 - 565
  • [15] Early Clinical Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A New Modified Technique for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Nagahama, Ken
    Ito, Manabu
    Abe, Yuichiro
    Murota, Eihiro
    Hiratsuka, Shigeto
    Takahata, Masahiko
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 3 (04): : 327 - 334
  • [16] Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Using the Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique Compared With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spine Diseases: Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes
    Zheng, Bo
    Zhang, Xiu-Li
    Li, Peng
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 24 (06) : E395 - E401
  • [17] Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up
    Park, Man-Kyu
    Park, Soo-An
    Son, Sang-Kyu
    Park, Weon-Wook
    Choi, Seung-Hyun
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 42 (03) : 753 - 761
  • [18] Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up
    Man-Kyu Park
    Soo-An Park
    Sang-Kyu Son
    Weon-Wook Park
    Seung-Hyun Choi
    Neurosurgical Review, 2019, 42 : 753 - 761
  • [19] Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Experience with 2-Year Follow-Up
    Wu, Junlong
    Liu, Huan
    Ao, Shengxiang
    Zheng, Wenjie
    Li, Changqing
    Li, Haiyin
    Pan, Yong
    Zhang, Chao
    Zhou, Yue
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [20] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558