A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency

被引:53
|
作者
Sheahan, Peter J. [1 ]
Nelson-Wong, Erika J. [2 ]
Fischer, Steven L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, 28 Div St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Regis Univ, Rueckert Hartman Coll Hlth Profess, Sch Phys Therapy, Denver, CO USA
关键词
Construct validity; cross-cultural adaptation; internal consistency; oswestry disability index; test-retest reliability; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CHINESE VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self-report-based outcome measure used to quantify the extent of disability related to low back pain (LBP), a substantial contributor to workplace absenteeism. The ODI tool has been adapted for use by patients in several non-English speaking nations. It is unclear, however, if these adapted versions of the ODI are as credible as the original ODI developed for English-speaking nations. The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the literature to identify culturally adapted versions of the ODI and to report on the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of these ODIs. Following a pragmatic review process, data were extracted from each study with regard to these four outcomes. While most studies applied adaptation processes in accordance with best-practice guidelines, there were some deviations. However, all studies reported high-quality psychometric properties: group mean construct validity was 0.7340.094 (indicated via a correlation coefficient), test-retest reliability was 0.9370.032 (indicated via an intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency was 0.8760.047 (indicated via Cronbach's alpha). Researchers can be confident when using any of these culturally adapted ODIs, or when comparing and contrasting results between cultures where these versions were employed.Implications for RehabilitationLow back pain is the second leading cause of disability in the world, behind only cancer.The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) has been developed as a self-report outcome measure of low back pain for administration to patients.An understanding of the various cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI is important for more concerted multi-national research efforts.This review examines 16 cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI and should inform the work of health care and rehabilitation professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:2367 / 2374
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Internal Consistency and Test-Retest Reliability of the Vocational Fit Assessment
    Persch, Andrew
    Guo, Karen
    Case, Christina
    Cleary, Dennis
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2017, 71 (04):
  • [22] Validity and test-retest reliability of a disability questionnaire for essential tremor
    Louis, ED
    Barnes, LF
    Wendt, KJ
    Albert, SM
    Pullman, SL
    Yu, QP
    Schneier, FR
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2000, 15 (03) : 516 - 523
  • [23] INTERNAL CONSISTENCY AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE NEED FOR COGNITION SCALE
    SADOWSKI, CJ
    GULGOZ, S
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1992, 74 (02) : 610 - 610
  • [24] Construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the upper limb functional index
    Albahrani, Yousef A.
    Alshami, Ali M.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [25] Brazilian version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-BR): Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity
    da Silva Rodrigues, Eula Katucha
    Registro Fonseca, Marisa de Cassia
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2015, 28 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [26] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Brief Dark Triad Measurements
    Dragostinov, Yavor
    Mottus, Rene
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2023, 105 (02) : 143 - 148
  • [27] Norwegian version of the Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural ALS screen: Construct validity, internal consistency, inter-rater, and test-retest reliability
    Taule, Tina
    Eide, Irmelin Smith
    Fjaer, Line
    Myrberget, Mari-Anne
    Oseland, Marit Sofie
    Rensa, Marit Arnevik
    Revheim, Tone
    Tysnes, Ole-Bjorn
    Assmus, Jorg
    Rekand, Tiina
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (05):
  • [28] NOTE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNAL CONSISTENCY AND TEST-RETEST ESTIMATES OF THE RELIABILITY OF A TEST
    Jackson, Robert W. B.
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1942, 7 (03) : 157 - 164
  • [29] Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
    Saw, Zhi Kuan
    Yuen, Jonathan Jun Xian
    Ashari, Asma
    Ibrahim Bahemia, Fatima
    Low, Yun Xuan
    Nik Mustapha, Nik Mukhriz
    Lau, May Nak
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [30] Test-retest reliability, internal item consistency, and concurrent validity of the wheelchair seating discomfort assessment tool
    Crane, BA
    Holm, MB
    Hobson, D
    Cooper, RA
    Reed, MP
    Stadelmeier, S
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 17 (02) : 98 - 107