Can the Image Processing Technique Be Potentially Used to Evaluate Quality of Frying Oil?

被引:0
|
作者
Udomkun, Patchimaporn [1 ]
Innawong, Bhundit [2 ]
Sopa, Wantakan [3 ]
机构
[1] IITA, Bujumbura, Burundi
[2] Silpakorn Univ, Dept Food Technol, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
[3] Thai Union Mfg Co Ltd, Samut Sakhon, Thailand
关键词
GLYCIDYL ESTERS CONTENT; COMPUTER VISION SYSTEM; POLAR COMPOUNDS; FRIED FOOD; DEGRADATION; DETERIORATION; CONSUMPTION; STABILITY; IMPACT; OLIVE;
D O I
10.1155/2019/6580320
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a computer vision system (CVS) for assessing the contact angle of frying oil. The oil was used to fry carbohydrate- and protein-based foods for 40h, and the oil was collected for measuring free fatty acids (FFA), peroxide value (PV), total polar materials (TPMs), and FOS reading (dielectric constant). The results showed that FFA linearly increased with frying time (R-2>0.95) while the polynomial correlation between TPMs and FOS reading as a result of time was observed (R-2>0.97). The contact angle obtained from CVS was highly correlated with all chemical qualities (R-2>0.94), except PV. In addition, the contact angle models could be used to adequately predict FFA, TPMs, and FOS reading of frying oil (R-2>0.91). This result suggested that the image processing technique through CVS could be an appropriate alternative to chemical analysis, especially for small- and medium-scale industrial frying.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Alpha Defensin-1 Biomarker Assay can be Used to Evaluate the Potentially Infected Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Bingham, Joshua
    Clarke, Henry
    Spangehl, Mark
    Schwartz, Adam
    Beauchamp, Christopher
    Goldberg, Brynn
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (12) : 4006 - 4009
  • [22] Retrieval of Air Quality information using image processing technique
    Lim, H. S.
    MatJafri, M. Z.
    Abdullah, K.
    Saleh, N. M.
    THERMOSENSE XXIX, 2007, 6541
  • [23] A new approach to evaluate antibacterial activity of textile materials using image processing technique
    Shams-Nateri, A.
    Piri, N.
    Mokhtari, J.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF FIBRE & TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 43 (04) : 483 - 487
  • [24] USING IMAGE PROCESSING TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF ORANGE FRUITS IN A NON-DESTRUCTIVE MANNER
    Elhosary, Mahmoud
    Elmetwalli, Adel
    Derbala, Asaad
    Elsayed, Salah
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 23 (03) : 267 - 276
  • [25] Assessment of Quality of Rice Grain using Optical and Image Processing Technique
    Parveen, Zahida
    Alam, Muhammad Anzar
    Shakir, Hina
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, COMPUTING AND DIGITAL SYSTEMS (C-CODE), 2017, : 265 - 270
  • [26] Adaptive Image Processing Technique for Quality Control in Ceramic Tile Production
    Rimac-Drlje, Snjezana
    Zagar, Drago
    Rupcic, Slavko
    STROJARSTVO, 2010, 52 (02): : 205 - 215
  • [27] Using image processing technique for the studies on temporal development of air quality
    Wong, C. J.
    MatJafri, M. Z.
    Abdullah, K.
    Lim, H. S.
    Low, K. L.
    COMPUTER GRAPHICS, IMAGING AND VISUALISATION: NEW ADVANCES, 2007, : 287 - +
  • [28] Influence of image processing operators and optical models used on the quality of depth estimation
    Simon, C
    Bicking, F
    Simon, T
    IMTC/O3: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH IEEE INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 156 - 161
  • [29] Can Image Segmentation Evaluation Metrics Be Used for Assessing the Quality of SBRT Plans?
    Arsenault, T.
    Amini, A.
    Baydoun, A.
    George, B.
    Bailey, L.
    Bhat, S.
    Kashani, R.
    Podder, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E293 - E294
  • [30] Can visual analogue scale be used in radiologic subjective image quality assessment?
    Suther, Kathrine Ryden
    Hopp, Einar
    Smevik, Bjarne
    Fiane, Arnt Eltvedt
    Lindberg, Harald Lauritz
    Larsen, Stig
    de Lange, Charlotte
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 48 (11) : 1567 - 1575