Removal of phosphate from wastewater using alkaline residue

被引:49
|
作者
Yan, Yubo [1 ]
Sun, Xiuyun [1 ]
Ma, Fangbian [1 ]
Li, Jiansheng [1 ]
Shen, Jinyou [1 ]
Han, Weiqing [1 ]
Liu, Xiaodong [1 ]
Wang, Lianjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm & Biol Engn, Jiangsu Key Lab Chem Pollut Control & Resources R, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
alkaline residue; chemical modification; phosphate removal; adsorption; precipitation; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; FLY-ASH; PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL; ADSORPTIVE REMOVAL; SLAG; ADSORBENT; IONS; EQUILIBRIUM; HYDROXIDE; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60537-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Alkaline residue (AR) was found to be an efficient adsorbent for phosphate removal from wastewater. The kinetic and equilibrium of phosphate removal were investigated to evaluate the performance of modified alkaline residue. After treatment by NaOH (AR-NaOH), removal performance was significantly improved, while removal performance was almost completely lost after treatment by HCl (AR-HCl). The kinetics of the removal process by all adsorbents was well characterized by the pseudo second-order model. The Langmuir model exhibited the best correlation for AR-HCl, while AR was effectively described by Freundlich model. Both models were well fitted to AR-NaOH. The maximum adsorption capacities calculated from Langmuir equation were in following manner: AR-NaOH > AR > AR-HCl. Phosphate removal by alkaline residue was pH dependent process. Mechanisms for phosphate removal mainly involved adsorption and precipitation, varied with equilibrium pH of solution. For AR-HCl, the acid equilibrium pH (< 6.0) was unfavorable for the formation of Ca-P precipitate, with adsorption as the key mechanism for phosphate removal. In contrast, for AR and AR-NaOH, precipitation was the dominant mechanism for phosphate removal, due to the incrase on pH (> 8.0) after phosphate removal. The results of both XRD and SEM analysis confirmed CaHPO4 center dot 2H(2)O formation after phosphate removal by AR and AR-NaOH.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 980
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancing phosphate removal from wastewater by using polyelectrolytes and clay injection
    Özacar, M
    Sengil, IA
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2003, 100 (1-3) : 131 - 146
  • [22] Arsenate removal from groundwater by modified alkaline residue
    Yan, Yubo
    Chen, Can
    Li, Qiao
    Sun, Xiuyun
    Wang, Lianjun
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (43) : 20401 - 20410
  • [23] Potential of nanofiltration for phosphate removal from wastewater
    Visvanathan, C
    Roy, PK
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 18 (05) : 551 - 556
  • [24] Potential of Nanofiltration for Phosphate Removal From Wastewater
    Visvanathan, C.
    Roy, P. K.
    Environmental Technology (England), 18 (05):
  • [25] The removal of phosphate by coal gangue from wastewater
    Zhang, Fangjuan
    Zhang, Huayong
    Zhang, Luyi
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT, PTS 1-3, 2012, 209-211 : 2005 - 2008
  • [26] Selective Phosphate Removal from Water and Wastewater using Sorption: Process Fundamentals and Removal Mechanisms
    Wu, Baile
    Wan, Jun
    Zhang, Yanyang
    Pan, Bingcai
    Lo, Irene M. C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (01) : 50 - 66
  • [27] Simultaneous removal of nitrate and phosphate from wastewater using solid waste from factory
    Berkessa, Yifru Waktole
    Mereta, Seid Tiku
    Feyisa, Fekadu Fufa
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2019, 9 (02)
  • [28] Simultaneous removal of nitrate and phosphate from wastewater using solid waste from factory
    Yifru Waktole Berkessa
    Seid Tiku Mereta
    Fekadu Fufa Feyisa
    Applied Water Science, 2019, 9
  • [29] Phosphorus removal from wastewater using rice husk and subsequent utilization of the waste residue
    Abbas, Mohammed Nsaif
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2015, 55 (04) : 970 - 977
  • [30] Phosphate removal from wastewaters using a weak anion exchanger prepared from a lignocellulosic residue
    Anirudhan, TS
    Noeline, BF
    Mancihar, DM
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (08) : 2740 - 2745