Environmental impact and cost assessment of a novel lignin production method

被引:33
|
作者
Yadav, Pooja [1 ]
Athanassiadis, Dimitris [1 ]
Antonopoulou, Io [2 ]
Rova, Ulrika [2 ]
Christakopoulos, Paul [2 ]
Tysklind, Mats [3 ]
Matsakas, Leonidas [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Biomat & Technol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, Div Chem Engn, Biochem Proc Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Chem, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
Bark; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost; Lignin; Renewable biofuel; Tannin; STEAM EXPLOSION PRETREATMENT; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; HYBRID ORGANOSOLV; FRACTIONATION; HYDROLYSIS; BIOMASS; BIRCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123515
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The oil scarcity and the rise in earth temperature have elevated the interest in lignocellulosic biorefineries. Lignin has high potential to be used in various applications including the production of biomaterials and transportation fuels. Among the different sources of lignin, organosolv lignin has the advantage of being sulphur-free and of low ash content compared to other types of industrial lignin. The present study focuses on cradle-to-gate life cycle and cost assessment of a novel organosolv lignin production process from spruce bark. The system boundary included production of tannin, lignin from spruce bark and handling of waste including all the inputs (material and energy) and outputs (emissions) in the process. Baseline scenario and scenarios S1 and S2 were compared to identify the most environmentally and economically suitable scenario. The baseline scenario is lignin production with co-production of tannin and tannin free bark (TFB) from spruce bark; scenario S1 is lignin production from TFB; and scenario S2 is lignin production from TFB with mass allocation. The functional unit was 1 kg lignin produced and ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method was used for the environmental impact assessment. The results showed that the baseline scenario had higher global warming potential (GWP) (2.14 kg CO(2)eq.) and total cost (1.959 (sic)/kg) than S1 (1.39 kg CO2 eq. and 1.377 (sic)/kg respectively) and S2 (0.23 kg CO(2)eq. and 0.998 (sic)/kg respectively) scenarios. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that the use of bioethanol instead of ethanol reduced the burden on GWP but increased the burden on the land use impact category. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact Assessment and Environmental Evaluation of Various Ammonia Production Processes
    Bicer, Yusuf
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Vezina, Greg
    Raso, Frank
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 59 (05) : 842 - 855
  • [42] Whey protein concentrate (WPC) production: Environmental impact assessment
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Bava, Luciana
    Schievano, Andrea
    Zucali, Maddalena
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2018, 224 : 139 - 147
  • [43] Environmental Impact Assessment of Discharged Heavy Metals in Textile Production
    Ji, Xiang
    Qian, Weiran
    Qiu, Xiaoxiao
    Yang, Yiduo
    Xu, Pinghua
    Wang, Laili
    FIBRES & TEXTILES IN EASTERN EUROPE, 2021, 29 (01) : 66 - 69
  • [44] Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production in Chongming ecological island
    Li, Shun
    Huang, Beijia
    Zhao, Feng
    Lu, Zhibo
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Chen, Xian
    Chen, Yanxi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (11): : 1937 - 1947
  • [45] Incorporating cleaner production analysis into environmental impact assessment in China
    Chen, WM
    Warren, KA
    Duan, N
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 1999, 19 (5-6) : 457 - 476
  • [46] Environmental impact assessment of aquaponic vegetable production: initial results
    Katsoulas, N.
    Aslanidou, M.
    Papanastasiou, D. K.
    Anestis, V.
    XXXI INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, IHC2022: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTION STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT HORTICULTURE, 2023, 1377 : 911 - 915
  • [47] The impact of environmental assessment to the reasonable production capacity of the large mine
    Gao, Yang
    Wang, Dongdong
    Li, Bin
    Li, Haifeng
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1-6, 2012, 518-523 : 1237 - 1241
  • [48] Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production in Chongming ecological island
    Shun Li
    Beijia Huang
    Feng Zhao
    Zhibo Lu
    Xiangyu Wang
    Xian Chen
    Yanxi Chen
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2019, 24 : 1937 - 1947
  • [49] Incorporating cleaner production analysis into environmental impact assessment in China
    Chen, Wenming
    Warren, Kimberley A.
    Duan, Ning
    Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19 (5-6): : 457 - 476
  • [50] Environmental impact assessment of open field and greenhouse strawberry production
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Mousazadeh, Hossein
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2013, 50 : 29 - 37