Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx - Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer

被引:2
|
作者
Tsue, TT
Desyatnikova, SS
Deleyiannis, FWB
Futran, ND
Stack, BC
Weymuller, EA
Glenn, MG
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,DEPT OTOLARYNGOL HEAD & NECK SURG,SEATTLE,WA
[2] VIRGINIA MASON CLIN,SEATTLE,WA 98101
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the cost and functional results of free and pedicled soft tissue reconstruction after posterior oral cavity and oropharyngeal extirpation. Design: Retrospective study of 53 consecutive patients undergoing extirpation with primary soft tissue reconstruction from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1995. Median follow-up was 298 days. Setting: Academic tertiary care medical center. Intervention: Twenty-four patients underwent reconstruction with a pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF); 29 patients, with a fasciocutaneous free flap (FF) (27 radial forearm, 1 lateral arm, and 1 scapular). Main Outcome Measures: Direct (inpatient hospital resources used and monetary costs) and intangible (postoperative complications and function) costs. Results: Operative time was longer for FF reconstructions (P=.003), but both patient groups had similar intensive care unit and hospital stays. Treatment cost for FF reconstructions was $41 122, compared with $37 160 for PMMF reconstructions (P=.003). This difference was due to increased professional fees for FF reconstruction (P<.001), which was offset by intangible cost differences. The PMMF group tended toward an increased rate of flap-related complications, compared with the FF group. At last follow-up, 4 patients in the FF group (15%) and 3 in the PMMF group (15%) had their tracheotomy. In contrast, 17 (85%) patients in the PMMF group and 11 (39%) patients in the FF group required enteral tube feedings (P=.002). Also, 18 (64%) patients in the FF group were eating at least a soft diet compared with 6 (30%) patients in the PMMF group (P=.02). Conclusions: Comparison of direct costs reveals only a modest difference in reconstruction costs that is outweighed by the intangible costs of PMMF reconstruction. The functional benefits of FF reconstruction appear to justify its slight increased expense and its use rather than PMMF reconstruction after extirpation in the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 737
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Soft Tissue Reconstruction: Free Tissue Transfer in Dysvascular and Diabetic Patients
    Pederson, William C.
    TECHNIQUES IN FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2013, 12 (02): : 87 - 91
  • [32] FREE TISSUE TRANSFER IN RECONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA RESECTION
    Penna, Vincenzo
    Iblher, Niklas
    Momeni, Arash
    Stark, G. Bjoern
    Bannasch, Holger
    MICROSURGERY, 2011, 31 (06) : 434 - 440
  • [33] Experience with microvascular free flaps in preoperatively irradiated tissue of the oral cavity and oropharynx in 303 patients
    Klug, C
    Berzaczy, D
    Voracek, M
    Enislidis, G
    Rath, T
    Millesi, W
    Ewers, R
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 41 (07) : 738 - 746
  • [34] A Retrospective Volume Matched Analysis of the Submental Artery Island Pedicled Flap as Compared to the Forearm Free Flap: Is It a Good Alternative Choice for the Reconstruction of Defects of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx?
    Aslam-Pervez, Nawaf
    Caldroney, Steven J.
    Isaiah, Amal
    Lubek, Joshua E.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (03) : 656 - 663
  • [35] Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap reconstruction of head and neck malignancy defects
    O'Neill, J. P.
    Shine, N.
    Eadie, P. A.
    Beausang, E.
    Timon, C.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 179 (03) : 337 - 343
  • [36] Late Complication in Posterior Tibial Artery Free Flap in Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity
    Vaz, Jason A.
    Cote, David
    Seikaly, Hadi
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 40 (05): : E43 - E44
  • [37] Reply: Comparison of the Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Flap with Immediate Fat Transfer versus Abdominally Based Free Tissue Transfer for Breast Reconstruction
    Zolper, Elizabeth G.
    Black, Cara K.
    Economides, James M.
    Abadeer, Andrew I.
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Song, David H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (06) : 1061E - 1062E
  • [38] Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap reconstruction of head and neck malignancy defects
    J. P. O’Neill
    N. Shine
    P. A. Eadie
    E. Beausang
    C. Timon
    Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2010, 179 : 337 - 343
  • [39] The reliability of submental flap for soft tissue reconstruction in patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity
    Eldweny, Hany
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (08): : 1374 - 1380
  • [40] Prognostic factors associated with achieving total oral diet following osteocutaneous microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction of the oral cavity
    Kansara, Sagar
    Wang, Tao
    Koochakzadeh, Sina
    Liou, Nelson E.
    Graboyes, Evan M.
    Skoner, Judith M.
    Hornig, Joshua D.
    Sandulache, Vlad C.
    Day, Terry A.
    Huang, Andrew T.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 98 : 1 - 7