Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx - Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer

被引:2
|
作者
Tsue, TT
Desyatnikova, SS
Deleyiannis, FWB
Futran, ND
Stack, BC
Weymuller, EA
Glenn, MG
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,DEPT OTOLARYNGOL HEAD & NECK SURG,SEATTLE,WA
[2] VIRGINIA MASON CLIN,SEATTLE,WA 98101
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the cost and functional results of free and pedicled soft tissue reconstruction after posterior oral cavity and oropharyngeal extirpation. Design: Retrospective study of 53 consecutive patients undergoing extirpation with primary soft tissue reconstruction from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1995. Median follow-up was 298 days. Setting: Academic tertiary care medical center. Intervention: Twenty-four patients underwent reconstruction with a pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF); 29 patients, with a fasciocutaneous free flap (FF) (27 radial forearm, 1 lateral arm, and 1 scapular). Main Outcome Measures: Direct (inpatient hospital resources used and monetary costs) and intangible (postoperative complications and function) costs. Results: Operative time was longer for FF reconstructions (P=.003), but both patient groups had similar intensive care unit and hospital stays. Treatment cost for FF reconstructions was $41 122, compared with $37 160 for PMMF reconstructions (P=.003). This difference was due to increased professional fees for FF reconstruction (P<.001), which was offset by intangible cost differences. The PMMF group tended toward an increased rate of flap-related complications, compared with the FF group. At last follow-up, 4 patients in the FF group (15%) and 3 in the PMMF group (15%) had their tracheotomy. In contrast, 17 (85%) patients in the PMMF group and 11 (39%) patients in the FF group required enteral tube feedings (P=.002). Also, 18 (64%) patients in the FF group were eating at least a soft diet compared with 6 (30%) patients in the PMMF group (P=.02). Conclusions: Comparison of direct costs reveals only a modest difference in reconstruction costs that is outweighed by the intangible costs of PMMF reconstruction. The functional benefits of FF reconstruction appear to justify its slight increased expense and its use rather than PMMF reconstruction after extirpation in the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 737
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the oral cavity and oropharynx
    Abemayor, E
    Blackwell, KE
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2000, 126 (07) : 909 - 912
  • [2] Speech quality after major surgery of the oral cavity and oropharynx with microvascular soft tissue reconstruction
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
    ten Bosch, Louis
    Cao, Li Ying
    Rinkel, Rico N. P. M.
    Borggreven, Pepijn A.
    Boves, Lou
    Leemans, C. Rene
    INTERSPEECH 2007: 8TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 1393 - +
  • [3] Cost and outcome of osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer versus pedicled soft-tissue reconstruction for composite mandibular Defects
    Talesnik, A
    Markowitz, B
    Calcaterra, T
    Ahn, C
    Shaw, W
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 97 (06) : 1167 - 1178
  • [4] Soft tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity
    Ariyan, S
    HEAD AND NECK CANCER, VOL 4, 1996, : 776 - 780
  • [5] Soft tissue reconstruction in the oral cavity: free thigh flap vs. radial forearm flap
    Pesucci, B
    Montemari, G
    Felici, N
    Boccieri, A
    Marano, A
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 1 (01) : 119 - 119
  • [6] SOFT-TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ORAL CAVITY
    YOUSIF, NJ
    MATLOUB, HS
    SANGER, JR
    CAMPBELL, B
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 1994, 21 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [7] Comorbid condition as a prognostic factor for complications in major surgery of the oral cavity and oropharynx with microvascular soft tissue reconstruction
    Borggreven, PA
    Kuik, DJ
    Quak, JJ
    de Bree, R
    Snow, GB
    Leemans, CR
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2003, 25 (10): : 808 - 815
  • [8] Submental island flap vs free tissue transfer in oral cavity reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Shirley
    Fan, Caleb
    Pecchia, Brandon
    Rosenberg, Joshua D.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2020, 42 (08): : 2155 - 2164
  • [9] Surgical strategies based on standard templates for microsurgical reconstruction of oral cavity and oropharynx soft tissue: A 20 years' experience
    Caliceti, Umberto
    Piccin, Ottavio
    Sgarzani, Rossella
    Negosanti, Luca
    Fernandez, Ignacio Javier
    Nebiaj, Aurel
    Contedini, Federico
    Cipriani, Riccardo
    Ceroni, Alberto Rinaldi
    MICROSURGERY, 2013, 33 (02) : 90 - 104
  • [10] A comparison of donor and recipient site sensation in free tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity
    Cordeiro, PG
    Schwartz, M
    Neves, RI
    Tuma, R
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 39 (05) : 461 - 468