A randomised study of misoprostol and gemeprost in combination with mifepristone for induction of abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy

被引:42
|
作者
Bartley, J [1 ]
Baird, DT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Reprod Biol, Edinburgh EM16 4SB, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-0328(02)01962-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the effectiveness of gemeprost and misoprostol as prostaglandins used in combination with mifepristone for induction of mid-trimester termination. Design Randomised trial. Setting Scottish teaching hospital. Sample One hundred women undergoing abortion between 12 and 20 weeks. Methods Each woman received 200 mg mifepristone and 36-48 hours later either 1 mg gemeprost vaginal pessary every 6 hours for 18 hours or 4 x 200 mug misoprostol tablets vaginally followed by 2 x 200 mug misoprostol tablets orally every 3 hours for 12 hours. Success was defined as the percentage of women aborted within 24 hours of the first administration of prostaglandin. Main outcome measures Prostaglandin-abortion interval and side effects. Results There were no significant differences in median prostaglandin-abortion interval between gemeprost (6.6 hours 95% CI 6.0-10.7) and misoprostol (6.1 hours 95% Cl 5.5-7.5) (P = 0.22). The cumulative abortion rates at 24 hours (96% vs 94%, respectively), the surgical evacuation rates (12% and 10%) and the incidence of vomiting, diarrhoea and pain were similar. Conclusion Two hundred milligrammes of mifepristone followed 36-48 hours later by either vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol is a highly effective way of inducing abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1294
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INDUCTION OF ABORTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL IN EARLY-PREGNANCY
    THONG, KJ
    BAIRD, DT
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (12): : 1004 - 1007
  • [22] SECOND TRIMESTER ABORTION: MIFEPRISTONE PLUS MISOPROSTOL vs. MISOPROSTOL PLUS OXYTOCIN
    Petca, Aida
    Zvanca, Mona
    Bot, Mihaela
    Petca, Razvan-Cosmin
    Mehedintu, Claudia
    Negoita, Silvius
    Maru, Nicoleta
    FARMACIA, 2019, 67 (05) : 850 - 856
  • [23] INDUCTION OF ABORTION IN THE 2ND TRIMESTER BY A COMBINATION OF MISOPROSTOL AND MIFEPRISTONE - A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 MISOPROSTOL REGIMENS
    ELREFAEY, H
    TEMPLETON, A
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (02) : 475 - 478
  • [24] Investigation of a variable mifepristone to misoprostol interval for second trimester medical abortion
    Henkel, A.
    Lerma, K.
    Blumenthal, P. D.
    Shaw, K. A.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (05) : 462 - 462
  • [25] Clinical efficacy of mifepristone and misoprostol in second trimester pregnancy termination
    Joensuu-Manninen, Heini
    Kuvaja, Paula
    Talvensaari-Mattila, Anne
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (12) : 1552 - 1556
  • [26] EARLY ABORTION INDUCTION BY A COMBINATION OF MIFEPRISTONE AND ORAL MISOPROSTOL - REPLY
    ELREFAEY, H
    TEMPLETON, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (06): : 506 - 507
  • [27] Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation
    Bartley, J
    Brown, A
    Elton, R
    Baird, DT
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (10) : 2098 - 2102
  • [28] Second Trimester Medical Abortion with Mifepristone-Misoprostol and Misoprostol Alone: A Review of Methods and Management
    Gewell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Lalitkumar, Sujata
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2008, 16 (31) : 162 - 172
  • [29] First trimester abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol
    Knudsen, UB
    CONTRACEPTION, 2001, 63 (05) : 247 - 250
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of mifepristone and sublingual misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion. A prospective study
    Peitsidis, N.
    Kapetanios, G.
    Kalogiannidis, I.
    Tsakiridis, I.
    Virgiliou, A.
    Dagklis, T.
    Mamopoulos, A.
    Athanasiadis, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 270 : E97 - E97