Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragrance patch tests -: A Multicenter-study by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group

被引:3
|
作者
Brasch, Jochen
Weichenthal, Michael
Szliska, Christiane
Loeffler, Harald
Koch, Patrick
Grabbe, Juergen
Mahler, Vera
Kreilgard, Bo
Hoeck, Ulla
机构
[1] Univ Schlesweg Holstein, Dept Dermatol, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Bethesda, Dept Dermatol, Freudenberg, Germany
[3] Univ Marburg, Dept Dermatol, Marburg, Germany
[4] Univ Saarland, Dept Dermatol, D-6650 Homburg, Germany
[5] Univ Schleswig Holstein, Dept Dermatol, Lubeck, Germany
[6] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Dermatol, Erlangen, Germany
[7] MEKOS Labs AS, Dept Dermatol, Hillerod, Denmark
关键词
patch test methods; contact sensitivity; diagnosis of contact sensitization;
D O I
10.2340/00015555-0095
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
It is tacitly assumed that a positive patch test reaction is not affected by adjacent negative tests. However, despite its fundamental importance for the interpretation of test reactions this assumption has not been proven. To test this assumption, special TRUE-test(R) strips were prepared containing placebo, nickel sulphate and fragrance mix as the only allergens, separated by distances of 1 cm and 7 cm and blinded to the investigators. Patients were synchronously tested with two strips. Out of 493 patients tested in 6 centres, the 93 with positive reactions to nickel sulphate only were evaluated. No relevant difference was found between positive nickel reactions in the two different distances to a negative fragrance patch test. We conclude that a positive patch test reaction is not affected by adjacent negative patch tests, which therefore can be neglected for the interpretation of positive reactions.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 347
页数:3
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Patch Testing With Nickel Sulfate 5.0% Traces Significantly More Contact Allergy Than 2.5%: A Prospective Study Within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group
    Svedman, Cecilia
    Ale, Iris
    Goh, Chee-Leok
    Goncalo, Margarida
    Lee, Jun Young
    Hadzavdic, Suzana Ljubojevic
    Matsunaga, Kayoko
    Bach, Rasmus Overgaard
    Pratt, Melanie
    Puangpet, Pailin
    Sasseville, Denis
    Andersen, Klaus E.
    Dahlin, Jakob
    Suzuki, Kayoko
    Yagami, Akiko
    Bruze, Magnus
    DERMATITIS, 2022, 33 (06) : 417 - 420
  • [22] Positive patch-test reactions to mixed dialkyl thioureas: Cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994 to 2004
    Warshaw, Erin M.
    Cook, Jeremy W.
    Belsito, Donald V.
    DeLeo, Vincent A.
    Fowler, Joseph F., Jr.
    Maibach, Howard I.
    Marks, James G., Jr.
    Mathias, C. G. Toby
    Pratt, Melanie D.
    Rietschel, Robert L.
    Sasseville, Denis
    Storrs, Frances J.
    Taylor, James S.
    Zug, Kathryn A.
    DERMATITIS, 2008, 19 (04) : 190 - 201
  • [23] Positive Patch-Test Reactions to Propylene Glycol: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1996 to 2006
    Warshaw, Erin M.
    Botto, Nina C.
    Maibach, Howard I.
    Fowler, Joseph F., Jr.
    Rietschel, Robert L.
    Zug, Kathryn A.
    Belsito, Donald V.
    Taylor, James S.
    DeLeo, Vincent A.
    Pratt, Melanie D.
    Sasseville, Denis
    Storrs, Frances J.
    Marks, James G., Jr.
    Mathias, C. G. Toby
    DERMATITIS, 2009, 20 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [24] Patch testing with the compositae mix. Results of a study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) and the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK)
    Geier, J
    Hausen, BM
    ALLERGOLOGIE, 2000, 23 (07) : 334 - 341
  • [25] Reproducibility of irritant patch test reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study using clinical scoring - Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG)
    Brasch, J
    Becker, D
    Effendy, I
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 41 (03) : 150 - 155
  • [26] Three-part scoring system (tripartite) for teledermatology versus International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria to interpret patch test readings: A comparative, observational study
    Jasly, Kuttiali
    Goyal, Sakshi
    Ashwini, P. K.
    Kanthraj, Garehatty Rudrappa
    Chethana, S. Gurumurthy
    Ranugha, Subramaniam
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2024, 90 (05): : 575 - 580
  • [27] Twenty-eight-day follow-up of patch test reactions to p-phenylenediamine and p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride: A multicentre study on behalf of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group
    Young, Ewa
    Andersen, Klaus E.
    Bruze, Magnus
    Gimenez-Arnau, Ana
    Ross-Hansen, Katrine
    Johansen, Jeanne D.
    Madsen, Jakob Torp
    Zimerson, Erik
    Svedman, Cecilia
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2019, 81 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [28] Exclusion of Disperse Orange 3 is possible from the textile dye mix present in the Swedish baseline patch test series. A study by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group
    Isaksson, Marlene
    Antelmi, Annarita
    Dahlin, Jakob
    Stenton, Joanna
    Svedman, Cecilia
    Zimerson, Erik
    Glas, Bo
    Hagvall, Lina
    Lagrelius, Maria
    Lownertz, Anna
    Malinauskiene, Laura
    Matura, Mihaly
    Bruze, Magnus
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2023, 88 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [29] Nurses' perceptions of the benefits and adverse effects of hand disinfection: alcohol-based hand rubs vs. hygienic handwashing: a multicentre questionnaire study with additional patch testing by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group
    Stutz, N.
    Becker, D.
    Jappe, U.
    John, S. M.
    Ladwig, A.
    Spornraft-Ragaller, P.
    Uter, W.
    Loeffler, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 160 (03) : 565 - 572