Subjective discomfort caused by vertical whole-body vibration in the frequency range 2-100 Hz

被引:25
|
作者
Huang, Yu [1 ]
Zhang, Penglin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Inst Vibrat Shock & Noise, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Vibration discomfort; whole-body vibration; frequency weightings; vibration magnitude; vibration standards; SEATED HUMAN-BODY; APPARENT MASS; DEPENDENCE; MAGNITUDE; TRANSMISSIBILITY; NONLINEARITIES; RESPONSES; COMFORT;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2018.1533145
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Current standards assume the same frequency weightings for discomfort at all magnitudes of vibration, whereas biodynamic and psychological studies show that the frequency-dependence of objective and subjective responses of the human body depends on the magnitude of vibration. This study investigated the discomfort of seated human body caused by vertical whole-body vibration over the frequency range 2-100 Hz at relatively high magnitudes from 1.0 to 2.5 ms(-2) r.m.s. Twenty-eight subjects (15 males and 13 females) judged the discomfort using the absolute magnitude estimation method. The rate of growth of discomfort with increasing vibration magnitude was highly dependent on the frequency, so the shapes of the equivalent comfort contours depended on the magnitude of vibration and no single frequency weighting would be appropriate for all magnitudes. The equivalent comfort contours indicated that the standards and previous relevant studies underestimated the vibration discomfort at frequencies greater than about 30 Hz. Practitioner Summary: The discomfort caused by vertical vibration at relatively high frequencies can be severe, particularly at relatively great magnitudes in transport. This study provides the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort at 2-100 Hz, and shows how the frequency weightings in the current standards can be improved at relatively high frequencies.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 430
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ASSESSING DISCOMFORT OF DUAL-AXIS WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION
    GRIFFIN, MJ
    WHITHAM, EM
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1977, 54 (01) : 107 - 116
  • [32] Influence of frequency on difference thresholds for magnitude of vertical sinusoidal whole-body vibration
    Matsumoto, Y
    Maeda, S
    Oji, Y
    INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2002, 40 (04) : 313 - 319
  • [33] Subjective discomfort analysis of human body in semi-supine posture caused by vertical sinusoidal vibration
    Govindan, Rajesh
    Saran, V. H.
    Harsha, S. P.
    ERGONOMICS, 2021, 64 (06) : 744 - 754
  • [34] SUBJECTIVE REACTIONS TO WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION OF SHORT DURATION
    KJELLBERG, A
    WIKSTROM, BO
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1985, 99 (03) : 415 - 424
  • [35] SUBJECTIVE RESPONSE TO WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION THE EFFECTS OF POSTURE
    OBORNE, DJ
    BOARER, PA
    ERGONOMICS, 1982, 25 (07) : 673 - 681
  • [36] STUDY OF SUBJECTIVE EQUIVALENCE OF NOISE AND WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION
    FLEMING, DB
    GRIFFIN, MJ
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1975, 42 (04) : 453 - 461
  • [37] Discomfort estimation for vertical whole-body vibration in the aircraft cabin considering the duration and static sitting comfort
    Huang, Yu
    Li, Jingdong
    ERGONOMICS, 2024, 67 (03) : 327 - 338
  • [38] VIBRATION TRANSMISSIBILITY AND SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION ON WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION IN A FIELD INVESTIGATION
    Daruis, Dian Darina Indah
    Nor, Mohd Jailani Mohd
    Deros, Baba Md
    Fouladi, Mohammad Hosseini
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2010,
  • [39] CROSS-MODALITY DETERMINATION OF SUBJECTIVE GROWTH FUNCTION FOR WHOLE-BODY VERTICAL, SINUSOIDAL, VIBRATION
    HEMPSTOCK, TI
    SAUNDERS, DJ
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1976, 46 (02) : 279 - 284
  • [40] EFFECT OF BODY SUPINATION ANGLE ON SUBJECTIVE RESPONSE TO WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION
    HARRAH, CB
    SHOENBERGER, RW
    AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1981, 52 (01): : 28 - 32