Quantitation reference compounds and VOC recoveries from soils by purge-and-trap GC/MS

被引:14
|
作者
Schumacher, BA
Ward, SE
机构
[1] US EPA,NATL EXPOSURE RES LAB,CHARACTERIZAT RES DIV,ANALYT SCI BRANCH,LAS VEGAS,NV 89193
[2] UNIV NEVADA,HARRY REID CTR ENVIRONM STUDIES,LAS VEGAS,NV 89154
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es960867q
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Unquantified volatile organic compound (VOC) losses occur in every phase of VOC determination including sample collection, transport, storage, preparation, and analysis. Current quality assurance/quality control measures, such as surrogate spikes and internal standards, do not account for losses that occur during sample handling nor do they account for soil matrix effects. An alternate approach, the quantitation reference compound (QRC) approach, is presented that involves direction injection of the QRCs onto the soil matrix to account for any matrix effects and losses during subsequent processing steps prior to sample analysis. Final VOC quantitation is based on the QRC instead of the internal standard, which is used strictly to monitor instrument performance. Quantifying VOCs using the QRC approach on three spiked performance evaluation soils and one unprocessed spiked field soil resulted in target compound relative recoveries of 93-105%. In contrast, using the current quantitation approach, target compound recoveries were only 2-27%. Precision between the two approaches was equivalent (on an absolute basis) with relative standard deviations of 2-15% using the QRC approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2287 / 2291
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of volatile components from niboshi by the purge-and-trap method
    Tanimoto, S
    Sakamoto, K
    Morimoto, K
    NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 2005, 71 (02) : 215 - 217
  • [32] Fingerprint of apple juices by purge and trap GC-MS
    Pinnel, V
    Rosseels, P
    Vandegans, J
    HRC-JOURNAL OF HIGH RESOLUTION CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1995, 18 (12): : 776 - 780
  • [33] A METHOD FOR ELIMINATING AMMONIA INTERFERENCE DURING PURGE-AND-TRAP ANALYSIS OF ORGANOHALOGEN COMPOUNDS
    COOPER, WJ
    MEHRAN, M
    SLIFKER, RA
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1982, 74 (10): : 42 - 43
  • [34] Comparison of two quantitative GC–MS methods for analysis of tomato aroma based on purge-and-trap and on solid-phase microextraction
    J. Beltran
    E. Serrano
    F. J. López
    A. Peruga
    M. Valcarcel
    S. Rosello
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2006, 385
  • [35] Fingerprint of apple juices by purge and trap GC-MS
    Pinnel, V.
    Rosseels, P.
    Vandegans, J.
    Journal of High Resolution Chromatography, 1995, 18 (12):
  • [36] MultiSimplex optimisation of purge-and-trap extraction of volatile organic compounds in soil samples
    Zuloaga, O
    Etxebarria, N
    Zubiaur, J
    Fernández, LA
    Madariaga, JM
    ANALYST, 2000, 125 (03) : 477 - 480
  • [37] High-speed analysis of volatile organic compounds in environmental samples using small-diameter capillary columns and purge-and-trap GC-MS systems
    George, C
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 19 (06) : 578 - +
  • [38] Comparison of two quantitative GC-MS methods for analysis of tomato aroma based on purge-and-trap and on solid-phase microextraction
    Beltran, J.
    Serrano, E.
    Lopez, F. J.
    Peruga, A.
    Valcarcel, M.
    Rosello, S.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 385 (07) : 1255 - 1264
  • [39] Trace analysis of phenolic compounds in water by in situ acetylation coupled with purge and trap-GC/MS
    Yu, Yi-jun
    Zhong, Sheng
    Su, Guan-yong
    Liu, Hong-ling
    Dai, Xuan-li
    Wang, Rong-jun
    Cai, Huan-xing
    Yu, Hong-xia
    ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2012, 4 (07) : 2156 - 2161
  • [40] PURGE-AND-TRAP EXTRACTION OF GEOSMIN AND 2-METHYLISOBORNEOL FROM SOIL
    STAHL, PD
    PARKIN, TB
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (04) : 1163 - 1167