Non-preemptible last section assignment for reducing feedback latency in real-time control systems

被引:1
|
作者
Song, Chi Young [1 ]
Kim, Byung Kook [2 ]
机构
[1] Agcy Def Dev, Taejon 300600, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Taejon, South Korea
关键词
control performance; real-time control; feedback latency; scheduling;
D O I
10.1080/00207720802692248
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A real-time control system design procedure consists of the controller design stage and the implementation stage. In the controller design stage, various digital control theories are used with assumptions, such as synchronous sampling, no sampling jitter and negligible feedback latency (latency from sensing to actuation). However, in the implementation stage, multiple control tasks are usually scheduled on a processor, which creates a finite sampling period, varying feedback latency and sampling jitter, and therefore the controller's performance is degraded. In this article, we investigate the relationship between control performance and timing parameters. In the course of this investigation, we found that the feedback latency is the dominant factor affecting control performance. In addition, we propose a rate monotonic (RM) scheduler with non-preemptible last section algorithm, which can reduce the feedback latency considerably. The proposed algorithm provides better control performance than a preemptive RM scheduler, in most cases. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is shown in illustrative examples.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 495
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feedback Scheduling of Real-Time Control Systems with Resource Constraints
    Xia, Feng
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 7 (03): : 263 - 264
  • [22] Feedback scheduling for real-time control of systems with communication delays
    Sename, O
    Simon, D
    Robert, D
    ETFA 2003: IEEE CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORY AUTOMATION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 454 - 461
  • [23] Reducing Last-Minute Plan Approvals Using Automated Real-Time Monitoring and Feedback
    Popple, R. A.
    Cardan, R. A.
    Fiveash, J. B.
    Spencer, S. A.
    Bonner, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S235 - S235
  • [24] Reducing WWW latency and bandwidth requirements by real-time distillation
    Fox, A
    Brewer, EA
    COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ISDN SYSTEMS, 1996, 28 (7-11): : 1445 - 1456
  • [25] Real-time feedback systems in CPR
    Gruber, Julia
    Stumpf, Dominik
    Zapletal, Bernhard
    Neuhold, Stephanie
    Fischer, Henrik
    TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 2 (06) : 287 - 294
  • [26] Feedback control for real-time scheduling
    Sahoo, DR
    Swaminathan, S
    Al-Omari, R
    Salapaka, MV
    Manimaran, G
    Somani, AK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2002, 1-6 : 1254 - 1259
  • [27] Packet Management for Optimizing Control Performance in Real-Time Feedback Control Systems
    Tong, Xin
    Li, Liying
    Zhao, Guodong
    Meng, Zhen
    Chen, Zhi
    Yang, Geng
    IECON 2020: THE 46TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2020, : 4362 - 4367
  • [28] A review of priority assignment in real-time systems
    Davis, Robert I.
    Cucu-Grosjean, Liliana
    Bertogna, Marko
    Burns, Alan
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE, 2016, 65 : 64 - 82
  • [29] Reducing power consumption of non-preemptive real-time systems
    Saleh Alrashed
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2017, 73 : 5402 - 5413
  • [30] Reducing power consumption of non-preemptive real-time systems
    Alrashed, Saleh
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2017, 73 (12): : 5402 - 5413