Utilization of surgical treatment for local and locoregional esophageal cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

被引:24
|
作者
Taylor, Lauren J. [1 ]
Greenberg, Caprice C. [1 ]
Lidor, Anne O. [1 ]
Leverson, Glen E. [1 ]
Maloney, James D. [1 ]
Macke, Ryan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Surg, H4-318 CSC,600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
epidemiology; esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; socioeconomic factors; treatment; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.30368
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDPrevious studies have suggested that esophagectomy is severely underused for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. The recent expansion of endoscopic local therapies, advances in surgical techniques, and improved postoperative outcomes have changed the therapeutic landscape. The impact of these developments and evolving treatment guidelines on national practice patterns is unknown. METHODSPatients diagnosed with clinical stage 0 to III esophageal cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2013). The receipt of potentially curative surgical treatment over time was analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with surgical treatment. RESULTSThe analysis included 52,122 patients. From 2004 to 2013, the overall rate of potentially curative surgical treatment increased from 36.4% to 47.4% (P<.001). For stage 0 disease, the receipt of esophagectomy decreased from 23.8% to 17.9% (P<.001), whereas the use of local therapies increased from 34.3% to 58.8% (P<.001). The use of surgical treatment increased from 43.4% to 61.8% (P<.001), from 36.1% to 45.0% (P<.001), and from 30.8% to 38.6% (P<.001) for patients with stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, divergent practice patterns and adherence to national guidelines were noted between academic and community facilities. CONCLUSIONSThe use of potentially curative surgical treatment has increased for patients with stage 0 to III esophageal cancer. The expansion of local therapies has driven increased rates of surgical treatment for early-stage disease. Although the increased use of esophagectomy for more advanced disease is encouraging, significant variation persists at the patient and facility levels. Cancer 2017;123:410-419. (c) 2016 American Cancer Society. National use of potentially curative surgical treatment increased from 36.4% in 2004 to 47.4% in 2013 for patients with stage 0 to III esophageal cancer. The adoption of endoscopic local therapies has predominated for early-stage disease, whereas an encouraging increase in the use of esophagectomy for locoregional disease has been observed.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 419
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of definitive concurrent therapy with or without surgery on resectable esophageal cancer survival: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
    Naik, Kushal
    Liu, Yuan
    Goodman, Michael
    Gillespie, Theresa Wicklin
    El-Rayes, Bassel F.
    Pickens, Allan
    Force, Seth
    Steuer, Conor Ernst
    Owonikoko, Taofeek Kunle
    Ramalingam, Suresh S.
    Shin, Dong Moon
    Willingham, Field F.
    Landry, Jerome Carl
    Fernandez, Felix
    Saba, Nabil F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [32] Adjuvant Therapy for Gallbladder Cancer: an Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
    Hoehn, Richard S.
    Wima, Koffi
    Ertel, Audrey E.
    Meier, Alexandra
    Ahmad, Syed A.
    Shah, Shimul A.
    Abbott, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (10) : 1794 - 1801
  • [33] Adjuvant Therapy for Gallbladder Cancer: an Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
    Richard S. Hoehn
    Koffi Wima
    Audrey E. Ertel
    Alexandra Meier
    Syed A. Ahmad
    Shimul A. Shah
    Daniel E. Abbott
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 19 : 1794 - 1801
  • [34] Utilization of Radiotherapy for Malignant Phyllodes Tumors: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base, 1998–2009
    Jennifer L. Gnerlich
    Richelle T. Williams
    Katherine Yao
    Nora Jaskowiak
    Swati A. Kulkarni
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 1222 - 1230
  • [35] A National Cancer Database analysis of treatment utilization and associated outcomes in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.
    Vlacich, Gregory Riccardo
    Samson, Pamela Parker
    Perkins, Stephanie Mabry
    Roach, Michael Charles
    Parikh, Parag J.
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    Lockhart, Albert C.
    Puri, Varun
    Meyers, Bryan F.
    Kozower, Benjamin D.
    Robinson, Cliff Grant
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)
  • [36] Primary Surgical-Based Versus Primary Radiation-Based Treatment for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
    Kamran, S. C.
    Mak, K. S.
    Qureshi, M. M.
    Shah, B. A.
    Jalisi, S.
    Salama, A.
    Truong, M. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E333 - E333
  • [37] Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: Analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base
    Pezzi, Christopher M.
    Patel-Parekh, Lina
    Cole, Karin
    Franko, Jan
    Klimberg, V. Suzanne
    Bland, Kirby
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (01) : 166 - 173
  • [38] Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: Analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base
    Pezzi, CM
    Patel-Parekh, L
    Cole, K
    Franko, J
    Klimberg, VS
    Bland, KI
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 26 - 27
  • [39] Characteristics and Treatment of Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Analysis of 892 Cases from the National Cancer Data Base
    Christopher M. Pezzi
    Lina Patel-Parekh
    Karin Cole
    Jan Franko
    V. Suzanne Klimberg
    Kirby Bland
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007, 14 : 166 - 173
  • [40] Racial differences in surgical evaluation, treatment, and outcome of locoregional esophageal cancer: A population-based analysis of elderly patients
    Steyerberg, EW
    Earle, CC
    Neville, BA
    Weeks, JC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (03) : 510 - 517