Are two heads better than one? Comparing dyad and self-regulated learning in simulation training

被引:38
|
作者
Shanks, David [1 ]
Brydges, Ryan [2 ,3 ]
den Brok, Wendie [1 ]
Nair, Parvathy [1 ]
Hatala, Rose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Wilson Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
COMPETENCE; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1111/medu.12284
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ContextThe optimal learner to simulator ratio for procedural skills training is not known. Research in motor learning suggests observational training in pairs, termed dyad training', may be as effective as directed self-regulated learning (DSRL). ObjectivesThis study was conducted to compare the relative effectiveness and efficiency of dyad versus DSRL training of simulation-based lumbar puncture (LP). MethodsWe conducted a two-group randomised equivalence trial. First-year internal medicine residents (n=50) were randomly assigned to learn LP either in dyads or as individual learners on a simulator, using a directed self-regulated approach (i.e. the learning sequence was defined for them, but they defined the pace of learning). Participants were videotaped performing a simulated LP on a pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a 6-week delayed retention test. In duplicate, blinded raters independently evaluated all trainee performances using a previously validated 5-point global rating scale (GRS) and 35-item checklist. ResultsOur analyses showed no significant differences (p=0.69) on pre-test, post-test or retention test GRS scores between the dyad (meanstandard deviation [SD] scores by test: 2.390.57, 3.48 +/- 0.62, 3.12 +/- 0.85, respectively) and DSRL (mean +/- SD scores by test: 2.67 +/- 0.50, 3.34 +/- 0.77, 3.21 +/- 0.79, respectively) groups. Both groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test (p<0.001) and retained that performance following the 6-week delay. Dyad participants experienced significantly greater pre-test to post-test gains than DSRL participants (p=0.02). There was no significant difference in total practice time between the groups (20.94minutes for individuals and 24.20minutes for dyads; p=0.175). ConclusionsOur results indicate that learning in pairs is as effective as independent DSRL. Dyad training permits the more efficient use of simulators as two learners use the same resources as an individual.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1222
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Self-regulated learning and training effectiveness
    Lourenco, Daniel
    Ferreira, Aristides I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 23 (02) : 117 - 134
  • [22] PROTACS: Two heads are better than one
    Kim, Kyung-Bo
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [23] Two (talking) heads are not better than one
    Li, Ming
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2008, 3
  • [24] When two heads are not better than one
    Jerrold, Laurance
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (01) : 133 - 135
  • [25] Two Heads Are Not Always Better Than One: Defining Parameters for Collaboration in Training
    Crook, Amy E.
    Beier, Margaret E.
    INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2008, 1 (04): : 484 - 486
  • [26] Self-regulated learning strategies and software training
    Gravill, Jane
    Compeau, Deborah
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 45 (05) : 288 - 296
  • [27] Synergy at work: two heads are better than one
    Sangita Jindal
    Amy Sparks
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 1227 - 1228
  • [28] Interhead Hydra: Two Heads are Better than One
    Jourenko, Maxim
    Larangeira, Mario
    Tanaka, Keisuke
    MATHEMATICAL RESEARCH FOR BLOCKCHAIN ECONOMY, MARBLE 2022, 2023, : 187 - 212
  • [29] Synergy at work: two heads are better than one
    Jindal, Sangita
    Sparks, Amy
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (07) : 1227 - +
  • [30] When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why?
    Koriat, Asher
    SCIENCE, 2012, 336 (6079) : 360 - 362