Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Csontos, Judit Katalin [1 ]
Fitzsimmons, Deborah [2 ]
Jones, Mari [2 ]
Wilkinson, Wendy M. [3 ]
Horton, Joanne [4 ]
Love-Gould, Lisa [5 ]
Tee, Anna [6 ]
Watts, Tessa [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[2] Swansea Univ, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[3] Wales Canc Network, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[4] Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Univ Hlth Board, Port Talbot, Wales
[5] Velindre Univ NHS Trust, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[6] Macmillan Canc Support, Bridgend, Wales
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; SURVIVORS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025953
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Long-term and late effects of cancer treatments can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Cancer rehabilitation services, which can comprise physical exercise, psychological support and educational interventions depending on the individual's needs, have been found to have a positive effect on health-related quality of life worldwide. However, accessibility or the lack of awareness on available help can act as barriers and influence the uptake of services, resulting in people having unmet rehabilitation needs. In Wales, UK, 41% of people, who have had health and social care needs resulting from cancer and its treatments, reported that they did not receive care when needed. The reason for this lack of support has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms in South Wales, UK, specifically addressing barriers, facilitators and costs. Methods and analysis Realist evaluation, which explains for whom a service works in what circumstances and how through context-mechanism-outcome pattern conjunctions, will be used in three phases to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms. Phase 1 will be secondary analysis of a cancer rehabilitation database from a local Health Board to give context to who are accessing rehabilitation. Phase 2 will be thematic analysis of face-to-face, semistructured rehabilitation participant (n=20) and healthcare professional (n=20) interviews to explore the mechanisms of how cancer rehabilitation works. Phase 3 will be two case studies and costconsequences analysis of cancer rehabilitation services. Ethics and dissemination This study received favourable ethical opinion from London South-East Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/2123) in December 2017. This project is part of the author's PhD thesis and it is expected that the findings will be disseminated in academic journals and at local and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring what influences the uptake of cancer rehabilitation services: a realist informed mixed-methods study
    Csontos, Judit Katalin
    Roche, Dominic
    Watts, Tessa
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [2] Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Nurjono, Milawaty
    Shrestha, Pami
    Lee, Alice
    Lim, Xin Ya
    Shiraz, Farah
    Tan, Shermin
    Wong, Shing Hei
    Foo, Kah Mun
    Wee, Thomas
    Toh, Sue-Anne
    Yoong, Joanne
    Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes Maria
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [3] Optimum hospice at home services for end-of-life care: protocol of a mixed-methods study employing realist evaluation
    Butler, Claire
    Brigden, Charlotte
    Gage, Heather
    Williams, Peter
    Holdsworth, Laura
    Greene, Kay
    Wee, Bee
    Barclay, Stephen
    Wilson, Patricia
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (05):
  • [4] Study protocol: a mixed-methods realist evaluation of the Universal Health Visiting Pathway in Scotland
    Doi, Lawrence
    Morrison, Kathleen
    Astbury, Ruth
    Eunson, Jane
    Horne, Margaret A.
    Jepson, Ruth
    Marryat, Louise
    Ormston, Rachel
    Wood, Rachael
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [5] Understanding integrated care pathways in palliative care using realist evaluation: a mixed methods study protocol
    Dalkin, Sonia Michelle
    Jones, Diana
    Lhussier, Monique
    Cunningham, Bill
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (04):
  • [6] Protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods realist evaluation of holistic needs assessment and care planning for people affected by cancer
    Johnston, Lucy
    Campbell, Karen
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [7] Protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods realist evaluation of holistic needs assessment and care planning for people affected by cancer
    Lucy Johnston
    Karen Campbell
    BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [8] Readiness for cancer rehabilitation in Denmark: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed methods study
    Kristiansen, Maria
    Adamsen, Lis
    Hendriksen, Carsten
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (11):
  • [9] Implementation of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a mixed methods study protocol
    Lopez, Christian
    Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.
    Campbell, Kristin L.
    Langelier, David M.
    Strudwick, Gillian
    Bender, Jackie L.
    Greenland, Jonathan
    Reiman, Tony
    Jones, Jennifer M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [10] A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Statutory Duty of Candour in Victorian Health Services: Study Protocol
    Harrison, Reema
    Adams, Corey
    Haque, Nabila Binte
    Morris, Jennifer
    Watson, Liat
    Siiankoski, Kristiina
    Chauhan, Ashfaq
    Danthakani, Thrivedi Sesha Sai
    Ameen, Sarah
    Hibbert, Peter
    Manias, Elizabeth
    Youngs, Nicole
    Birks, Lanii
    Walpola, Ramesh
    Fischer, Sarah
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2025, 28 (01)