Comparison of cervical cerebrospinal fluid flow quantification between healthy volunteers and patients with spinal stenosis

被引:1
|
作者
Cicek, D
Tali, ET [1 ]
Yucel, S
Yerli, H
Ercan, N
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Neuroradiol Sect, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Zekai Tahir Burak Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Sami Ulus Childrens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Baskent Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
来源
RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA | 2004年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
CSF; cervical spine; cine phase-contrast MRI; flow analysis;
D O I
10.1177/197140090401700108
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We measured spinal CSF velocity in healthy volunteers and patients with spinal stenosis secondary to degenerative changes of the spine. A total of 122 subjects: 33 healthy volunteers and 89 patients with neck and shoulder pain were examined. Flow quantification was obtained using cine phase-contrast sequence and flow analysis software at C7 level. The symptomatic patients were graded into three groups according to the visual degree of stenosis. In addition, all subjects were divided into three index groups dividing the dural sac area from the cord area at C7 level in the healthy volunteers, and at the most prominent stenotic level in the patient group. Subarachnoidal space index was also calculated by subtracting the cord area from the dural sac area at the same levels. The maximum systolic velocities in front of the cord at C7 level were measured between 4.6 and 31.7 (average: 17.2 +/- 7.4) cm/s in the volunteer group and 4.5 and 41.6 (average: 16.1 +/- 6.8) cm/s in the patient group, whereas the maximum diastolic velocities were calculated between 3.1 to 28.5 (15.1 +/- 7.5) cm/s in the volunteer group and 1.5 to 40.3 (14.5 +/- 7.4) cm/s in the patients respectively. Systolic average velocities were 2.9 - 10.6 (average: 6.1 +/- 2.2) cm/s in the volunteers and 1.7 - 17.8 (6.6 - 2.9) cm/s in the patients; corresponding diastolic average velocities were 0.6 - 11.9 (4.7 +/- 2,4) cm/s and 0.4 - 14,9 (4.9 +/- 2.8) cm/s. Systolic flow rates were 17.5 - 82.6 (34.3 +/- 10.7) ml/min in the Volunteers and 5.05 - 104.2 (36.0 + 19.5) ml/min in the patient group whereas diastolic flow rates were 3.5 - 78.4 (29.0 +/- 15.1) ml/min and 1.6 - 75.6 (26.2 +/- 15.4) ml/min. No statistically significant difference was found between the CSF flow patterns, CSF velocities and flow rates at the C7 anterior subarachnoid space in healthy subjects and patients with spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of melatonin: a pilot study in healthy male volunteers
    A. Rousseau
    S. Petrén
    J. Plannthin
    T. Eklundh
    C. Nordin
    Journal of Neural Transmission, 1999, 106 : 883 - 888
  • [42] Cerebrospinal fluid flow artifact reduction with deep learning to optimize the evaluation of spinal canal stenosis on spine MRI
    Ue-Hwan Kim
    Hyo Jin Kim
    Jiwoon Seo
    Jee Won Chai
    Jiseon Oh
    Yoon-Hee Choi
    Dong Hyun Kim
    Skeletal Radiology, 2024, 53 : 957 - 965
  • [43] Image analysis techniques for in vivo quantification of cerebrospinal fluid flow
    Daehyun Kim
    Yiming Gan
    Maiken Nedergaard
    Douglas H. Kelley
    Jeffrey Tithof
    Experiments in Fluids, 2023, 64
  • [44] Cerebrospinal fluid proteome comparison between multiple sclerosis patients and controls
    Kroksveen, A. C.
    Guldbrandsen, A.
    Vedeler, C.
    Myhr, K. M.
    Opsahl, J. A.
    Berven, F. S.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 126 : 90 - 96
  • [45] Image analysis techniques for in vivo quantification of cerebrospinal fluid flow
    Kim, Daehyun
    Gan, Yiming
    Nedergaard, Maiken
    Kelley, Douglas H.
    Tithof, Jeffrey
    EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2023, 64 (11)
  • [46] Cervical spinal canal stenosis: the differences between stenosis at the lower cervical and multiple segment levels
    Morishita, Yuichiro
    Naito, Masatoshi
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (10) : 1517 - 1522
  • [47] Association between cervical and lumbar stenosis of the spinal canal
    Adamová, B
    Bednarík, J
    Smardová, L
    Moravcová, E
    Chvátalová, N
    Prokes, B
    Kadanka, Z
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2000, 63 (05) : 261 - 267
  • [48] Cervical spinal canal stenosis: the differences between stenosis at the lower cervical and multiple segment levels
    Yuichiro Morishita
    Masatoshi Naito
    Jeffrey C. Wang
    International Orthopaedics, 2011, 35 : 1517 - 1522
  • [49] CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID MONOAMINE METABOLITES IN FLUOXETINE-TREATED PATIENTS WITH MAJOR DEPRESSION AND IN HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS
    DEBELLIS, MD
    GERACIOTI, TD
    ALTEMUS, M
    KLING, MA
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 33 (8-9) : 636 - 641
  • [50] Magnetic resonance 4D flow characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid at the craniocervical junction and the cervical spinal canal
    Bunck, Alexander C.
    Kroeger, Jan-Robert
    Juettner, Alena
    Brentrup, Angela
    Fiedler, Barbara
    Schaarschmidt, Frank
    Crelier, Gerard R.
    Schwindt, Wolfram
    Heindel, Walter
    Niederstadt, Thomas
    Maintz, David
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (08) : 1788 - 1796