Gossypibomas in India - A systematic literature review

被引:8
|
作者
Patial, T. [1 ]
Thakur, V [1 ]
Ganesun, Vijhay N. K. [1 ]
Sharma, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indira Gandhi Med Coll, Dept Gen Surg, Shimla, Himachal Prades, India
[2] Indira Gandhi Med Coll, Dept Forens Med, Shimla, Himachal Prades, India
关键词
Cottonoma; gauzoma; gossypiboma; pathogenesis; retained foreign body; retained surgical item; retained surgical sponge; systematic review; textiloma; RETAINED SURGICAL SPONGES; TRANSMURAL MIGRATION; FOREIGN-BODIES; SURGERY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.4103/0022-3859.198153
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of Review: Gossypibomas remain a dreaded and unwanted complication of surgical practice. Despite significant interest and numerous guidelines, the number of reported cases remains sparse due to various factors, including potential legal implications. Herein, we review related data from India to ascertain if the problem is better or worse than that reported in world literature. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar, to collect and analyze all case reports and case reviews regarding the condition in India. Results: On analysis of the results, there were 100 publications reporting a total of 126 events. The average patient age was 38.65 years. Average time to discovery was 1225.62 days. Forty-nine percent of reported cases were discovered within the 1st year. The most common clinical features were pain (73.8%), palpable mass (47.6%), vomiting (35%), abdominal distention (26%), and fever (12.6%). Spontaneous expulsion of the gossypiboma was noted in five cases (3.96%). Transmural migration was seen in 36 cases (28.57%). Conclusions: Despite advancements in surgical approaches and preventive measures, gossypibomas continue to be a cause of significant morbidity. A safe working culture, open communication, teamwork, and an accurate sponge count remain our best defence against this often unpredictable complication of surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 41
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Upskirting: A Systematic Literature Review
    Lewis, Ruth
    Anitha, Sundari
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2023, 24 (03) : 2003 - 2018
  • [32] Shadow IT - A Systematic Literature Review
    Rakovic, Lazar
    Sakal, Marton
    Matkovic, Predrag
    Maric, Mirjana
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROL, 2020, 49 (01): : 144 - 160
  • [33] Multilatinas: a systematic literature review
    Satsumi Lopez-Morales, Jose
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND STRATEGY, 2018, 28 (3-4) : 331 - 357
  • [34] Neurotoxocariasis: a systematic literature review
    Deshayes, S.
    Bonhomme, J.
    de La Blanchardiere, Arnaud
    INFECTION, 2016, 44 (05) : 565 - 574
  • [35] Sufficiency: A systematic literature review
    Jungell-Michelsson, Jessica
    Heikkurinen, Pasi
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 195
  • [36] A Systematic Literature Review of A* Pathfinding
    Foead, Daniel
    Ghifari, Alifio
    Kusuma, Marchel Budi
    Hanafiah, Novita
    Gunawan, Eric
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE 2020, 2021, 179 : 507 - 514
  • [37] Familicide: A Systematic Literature Review
    Karlsson, Linda C.
    Antfolk, Jan
    Putkonen, Hanna
    Amon, Sabine
    da Silva Guerreiro, Joao
    de Vogel, Vivienne
    Flynn, Sandra
    Weizmann-Henelius, Ghitta
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2021, 22 (01) : 83 - 98
  • [38] Geotourism: A Systematic Literature Review
    Olafsdottir, Rannveig
    Tverijonaite, Edita
    GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [39] Greenwashing: A systematic literature review
    Huang, Zhen
    Shi, Yanxuan
    Jia, Ming
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2025, 65 (01): : 857 - 882
  • [40] Rhupus: a systematic literature review
    Antonini, Luca
    Mauff, Brigitte Le
    Marcelli, Christian
    Aouba, Achille
    Boysson, Hubert de
    AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2020, 19 (09)