Quantifying urban wastewater treatment sector's greenhouse gas emissions using a hybrid life cycle analysis method - An application on Shenzhen city in China

被引:75
|
作者
Liao, Xiawei [1 ]
Tian, Yujia [1 ]
Gan, Yiwei [2 ]
Ji, Junping [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Environm & Energy, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Greenpeace 94, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Urban wastewater treatment; Hybrid life cycle analysis; Greenhouse gas emissions; Wastewater treatment technologies; TREATMENT PLANTS; ENERGY; INTENSITY; INVENTORY; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141176
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Substantial amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated at urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are gaining increasing appreciation. Improving upon the commonly used Process-Based Life-Cycle Analysis (PLCA) and Environmentally-Extended Life-Cycle Analysis (EIO-LCA) models, we construct a Hybrid Life Cycle Analysis (HLCA) model and quantify both direct and indirect GHG emissions at the operational stage of WWTPs in Shenzhen, one of the fastest urbanizing cities in the world. Data are collected from 26 wastewater treatment plants in Shenzhen, out of all 32, covering 5 commonly used wastewater treatment technologies in China, i.e. Sequencing Batch Reactor, Oxidation Ditch, Biological Filter, AAOMBR and AAO. The results show that WWTPs using MO-MBR technology have the highest GHG emission intensity, averaging 0.79 tons per m(3), primarily due to its large electricity intensity required. WWTPs using other technologies emit 0.27 to 0.39 tons of GHGs per m(3) of wastewater treated. GHG emissions associated with electridty use occupy the largest share, ranging from 65 to 75%. Therefore, transforming the energy structure of the electric power sector to low-carbon sources can reduce WWTPs operational GHG emissions. In total, GHG emissions from Shenzhen's urban wastewater sector have increased from below 0.5 million tons in 2012 to over 0.6 million tons in 2017. Inter-model comparison shows that EIO-LCA substantially underestimates the urban wastewater sector's GHG emissions using the water sector's average parameters while PLCA also results in minor underestimations due the omission of indirect emissions in the production stage of chemicals and other material inputs. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from sewage treatment with urbanization: Understanding the opportunities and challenges for climate change mitigation in China's low-carbon pilot city, Shenzhen
    Xian, Chaofan
    Gong, Cheng
    Lu, Fei
    Wu, Haotong
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 855
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment of a wastewater treatment plant in an urban area using the environmental footprint method
    Gomez, Sanjuana Rodriguez
    Castillo, Nahum Andres Medellin
    Orozco, Israel Herrera
    Galarza, Alfredo Avila
    Larragoitia, Sergio Arturo Castro
    Flores, Miguel Mauricio Aguilera
    Vazquez, Veronica avila
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 27 (4) : 9145 - 9163
  • [33] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and economic analysis of alternative treatments of solid waste from city markets in Vietnam
    Otoma, Suehiro
    Diaz, Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 19 (01) : 70 - 87
  • [34] Prospective life cycle analysis of a BIPV façade - Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions using future projections for a case study☆
    Popp, Christian
    Uhlig, Clara
    Engelmann, Michael
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2025, 330
  • [35] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and economic analysis of alternative treatments of solid waste from city markets in Vietnam
    Suehiro Otoma
    Ricardo Diaz
    Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2017, 19 : 70 - 87
  • [36] China's changing city-level greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste treatment and driving factors
    Kang, Yating
    Yang, Qing
    Wang, Liang
    Chen, Yingquan
    Lin, Guiying
    Huang, Junling
    Yang, Haiping
    Chen, Hanping
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 180
  • [37] Parameter Uncertainty Analysis of the Life Cycle Inventory Database: Application to Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Brown Rice Production in IDEA
    Baek, Chun-Youl
    Tahara, Kiyotaka
    Park, Kyu-Hyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of typical sewage sludge incineration treatment route based on two case studies in China
    Yang, Hang
    Guo, Yali
    Fang, Ning
    Dong, Bin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 231
  • [39] A Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Nonrenewable Energy and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions of a Village-Level Biomass Gasification Project in China
    Wang, Changbo
    Zhang, Lixiao
    Yang, Shuying
    Pang, Mingyue
    ENERGIES, 2012, 5 (08) : 2708 - 2723
  • [40] Interrogating greenhouse gas emissions of different dietary structures by using a new food equivalent incorporated in life cycle assessment method
    Zhang, Mengrong
    Li, Hanbing
    Chen, Sha
    Liu, Yingying
    Li, Sumei
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 103