Regression using hybrid Bayesian networks: Modelling landscape-socioeconomy relationships

被引:24
|
作者
Ropero, R. F. [1 ]
Aguilera, P. A. [1 ]
Fernandez, A. [2 ]
Rumi, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Almeria, Dept Biol & Geol, Informat & Environm Lab, Almeria, Spain
[2] Univ Almeria, Dept Math, Almeria, Spain
关键词
Continuous Bayesian networks; Mixtures of truncated exponentials; Regression; Landscape; Socioeconomic structure; DRIVING FORCES; NAIVE BAYES; BELIEF NETWORKS; TRUNCATED EXPONENTIALS; MIXTURES; CLASSIFIERS; MANAGEMENT; INFERENCE; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.02.016
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Modelling environmental systems becomes a challenge when dealing directly with continuous and discrete data simultaneously. The aim in regression is to give a prediction of a response variable given the value of some feature variables. Multiple linear regression models, commonly used in environmental science, have a number of limitations: (1) all feature variables must be instantiated to obtain a prediction, and (2) the inclusion of categorical variables usually yields more complicated models. Hybrid Bayesian networks are an appropriate approach to solve regression problems without such limitations, and they also provide additional advantages. This methodology is applied to modelling landscape-socioeconomy relationships for different types of data (continuous, discrete or hybrid). Three models relating socioeconomy and landscape are proposed, and two scenarios of socioeconomic change are introduced in each one to obtain a prediction. This proposal can be easily applied to other areas in environmental modelling. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 137
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling relationships between socioeconomy, landscape and water flows in Mediterranean agroecosystems: a case study in Adra catchment (Spain) using Bayesian networks
    Ropero, Rosa F.
    Rumi, Rafael
    Aguilera, Pedro A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2019, 26 (01) : 47 - 86
  • [2] Modelling relationships between socioeconomy, landscape and water flows in Mediterranean agroecosystems: a case study in Adra catchment (Spain) using Bayesian networks
    Rosa F. Ropero
    Rafael Rumí
    Pedro A. Aguilera
    Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2019, 26 : 47 - 86
  • [3] Modelling dependable systems using hybrid Bayesian networks
    Neil, Martin
    Tailor, Manesh
    Marquez, David
    Fenton, Norman
    Hearty, Peter
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (07) : 933 - 939
  • [4] Landscape aesthetic modelling using Bayesian networks: Conceptual framework and participatory indicator weighting
    Kerebel, Anthony
    Gelinas, Nancy
    Dery, Steve
    Voigt, Brian
    Munson, Alison
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 185 : 258 - 271
  • [5] Bayesian modelling of nonlinear Poisson regression with artificial neural networks
    Rodrigo, Hansapani
    Tsokos, Chris
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2020, 47 (05) : 757 - 774
  • [6] Using Bayesian networks to model agent relationships
    Banerjee, B
    Biswas, A
    Mundhe, M
    Debnath, S
    Sen, S
    APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 14 (09) : 867 - 879
  • [7] MODELLING ELECTRONIC TRUST USING BAYESIAN NETWORKS
    Velimirovic, Jelena D.
    Janjic, Aleksandar
    Velimirovic, Lazar Z.
    XIV INTERNATIONAL MAY CONFERENCE ON STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL XIV, ISSUE (1) (2018), 2018, 14 (01): : 460 - 465
  • [8] Modelling behavioral syndromes using Bayesian networks
    Chevrolat, JP
    Golmard, JL
    Ammar, S
    Jouvent, R
    Boisvieux, JF
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 14 (03) : 259 - 277
  • [9] Modelling multiple-classifier relationships sing Bayesian belief networks
    Chindaro, Samuel
    Sirlantzis, Konstantinos
    Fairhurst, Michael
    MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4472 : 312 - +
  • [10] Forest landscape aesthetic quality model (FLAQM): A comparative study on landscape modelling using regression analysis and artificial neural networks
    Jahani A.
    Journal of Forest Science, 2019, 65 (02) : 61 - 69