A survey of current trends in near-surface electrical and electromagnetic methods

被引:110
|
作者
Auken, Esben
Pellerin, Louise
Christensen, Niels B.
Sorensen, Kurt
机构
[1] Univ Aarhus, Dept Earth Sci, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] Green Engn Inc, Berkeley, CA 94702 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.2335575
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Electrical and electromagnetic (E&EM) methods for near-surface investigations have undergone rapid improvements over the past few decades. Besides the traditional applications in groundwater investigations, natural-resource exploration, and geological mapping, a number of new applications have appeared. These include hazardous-waste characterization studies, precision-agriculture applications, archeological surveys, and geotechnical investigations. The inclusion of microprocessors in survey instruments, development of new interpretation algorithms, and easy access to powerful computers have supported innovation throughout the geophysical community and the E&EM community is no exception. Most notable are development of continuous-measurement systems that generate large, dense data sets efficiently. These have contributed significantly to the usefulness of E&EM methods by allowing measurements over wide areas without sacrificing lateral resolution. The availability of these luxuriant data sets in turn spurred development of interpretation algorithms, including: Laterally constrained ID inversion as well as innovative 2D- and 3D-inversion methods. Taken together, these developments can be expected to improve the resolution and usefulness of E&EM methods and permit them to be applied economically. The trend is clearly toward dense surveying over larger areas, followed by highly automated, post-acquisition processing and interpretation to provide improved resolution of the shallow subsurface in a cost-effective manner.
引用
收藏
页码:G249 / G260
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of near-surface ice on Mars with electromagnetic techniques on board future surface vehicles
    Hamelin, M
    Trautner, R
    Grard, R
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2003, 108 (E4)
  • [32] COMPUTATION OF ERRORS IN CURRENT METERS ATTACHED TO NEAR-SURFACE MOORINGS
    CHHABRA, NK
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1985, 90 (NC3): : 4995 - 4999
  • [33] CMICE - A NEAR-SURFACE CURRENT-METER INTERCOMPARISON EXPERIMENT
    BEARDSLEY, RC
    BOICOURT, WC
    HUFF, LC
    MCCULLOUGH, JR
    SCOTT, J
    DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART A-OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH PAPERS, 1981, 28 (12): : 1577 - 1603
  • [34] Near-surface structure and energy characteristics of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
    GAO Libao
    YU Weidong
    WANG Haiyuan
    LIU Yanliang
    AdvancesinPolarScience, 2013, 24 (04) : 265 - 272
  • [35] Diffusion-driven current transport to near-surface nanostructures
    Kivisaari, Pyry
    Riuttanen, Lauri
    Suihkonen, Sami
    Oksanen, Jani
    15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES NUSOD 2015, 2015, : 117 - 118
  • [36] On the Measurement of Ocean Near-Surface Current from a Moving Buoy
    Herrera-Vazquez, Carlos F.
    Rascle, Nicolas
    Ocampo-Torres, Francisco J.
    Osuna, Pedro
    Garcia-Nava, Hector
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (08)
  • [37] New Type of Current Collectors with Modified Near-Surface Layer
    Ledukhovskaya, Natalya
    Frolova, Elena
    Strukov, Gennady
    Matveev, Danila
    Bredikhin, Sergey
    SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELLS 11 (SOFC-XI), 2009, 25 (02): : 1523 - 1528
  • [38] Exploiting lateral resolution of near-surface seismic refraction methods
    Derecke Palmer
    Journal of Earth Science, 2009, 20 : 526 - 545
  • [39] Exploiting Lateral Resolution of Near-Surface Seismic Refraction Methods
    Derecke Palmer
    Journal of Earth Science, 2009, 20 (03) : 526 - 545