The Relationship between Biofilm Production and Antimicrobial Resistance in Methicillin-sensitive and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates: In vitro Evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Dalgic, Bahise Cagla Taskin [1 ]
Yenisehirli, Gulgun [2 ]
Otlu, Baris [3 ]
Tanriverdi, Elif Seren [3 ]
Yenisehirli, Aydan [4 ]
Bulut, Yunus [2 ]
机构
[1] Turhal State Hosp, Med Microbiol Lab, Tokat, Turkey
[2] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Med Microbiol, Fac Med, Tokat, Turkey
[3] Inonu Univ, Dept Med Microbiol, Fac Med, Malatya, Turkey
[4] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Med Pharmacol, Fac Med, Tokat, Turkey
关键词
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus; methicillin-sensitive S. aureus; antimicrobial susceptibility; biofilm formation; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; STRAINS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; VANCOMYCIN; IS256; GENES;
D O I
10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2021.14
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Introduction: The biofilm formation ability plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. This study aimed to investigate the biofilm production ability of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates and evaluate the relationship between their antimicrobial resistance profile and biofilm formation ability. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 MRSA and 50 MSSA isolates were examined. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates was performed using the disk diffusion method. The broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin and teicoplanin. The biofilm formation ability of isolates was tested on Congo Red Agar. The presence of icaA, icaD, IS256, and eno genes was investigated by polymerase chain reaction. Results: Both MRSA and MSSA isolates were found susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, chloramphenicol, and linezolid. Two MRSA and 2 MSSA isolates were determined as heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus. No significant difference was observed between the biofilm formation ability of MRSA and MSSA isolates. The eno and icaD genes were detected in 100% of both MSSA and MRSA isolates. The icaA gen was detected in all MRSA and 49 MSSA isolates. The IS256 was detected in 35 of the 50 MRSA isolates. None of the MSSA isolates were positive for the IS256. The amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, rifampin, clindamycin, and tetracycline resistance rates in IS256-positive MRSA isolates were significantly higher than those IS256-negative MRSA isolates. The mean MIC values of vancomycin and teicoplanin in IS256-positive MRSA isolates were significantly higher than those in IS256-negative MRSA isolates. Conclusion: This study revealed that the presence of the IS256 sequence was correlated with antimicrobial resistance, especially MRSA isolates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ULTRASTRUCTURE OF METHICILLIN-SENSITIVE AND METHICILLIN-RESISTANT MUTANTS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS
    ROZGONYI, F
    VACZI, L
    LUSTYIK, G
    JEKEL, D
    LACZKO, J
    REDAI, I
    ACTA MICROBIOLOGICA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 1973, 20 (01): : 26 - 27
  • [42] Methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:: Management principles and selection of antibiotic therapy
    Elston, Dirk M.
    DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 2007, 25 (02) : 157 - +
  • [43] Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in pork industry workers, Catalonia, Spain
    Quero, Sara
    Serras-Pujol, Marina
    Parraga-Nino, Noemi
    Torres, Carmen
    Navarro, Marian
    Vilamala, Anna
    Puigoriol, Emma
    de los Rios, Javier Diez
    Arque, Elisenda
    Serra-Pladevall, Judit
    Romero, Alba
    Molina, Daniel
    Paredes, Roger
    Pedro-Botet, Maria Luisa
    Reynaga, Esteban
    ONE HEALTH, 2023, 16
  • [44] Rapid discrimination between methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by intact cell mass spectrometry
    Edwards-Jones, V
    Claydon, MA
    Evason, DJ
    Walker, J
    Fox, AJ
    Gordon, DB
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 49 (03) : 295 - 300
  • [45] Maternal-Infant Perinatal Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
    Pinter, David M.
    Mandel, Judy
    Hulten, Kristina G.
    Minkoff, Howard
    Tosi, Michael F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 26 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [46] Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus From Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus and Molecular Characterization in Quanzhou, China
    Bai, Zhimin
    Chen, Min
    Lin, Qiaofa
    Ye, Ying
    Fan, Hongmei
    Wen, Kaizhen
    Zeng, Jianxing
    Huang, Donghong
    Mo, Wenfei
    Lei, Ying
    Liao, Zhijun
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 9
  • [47] The relationship between nasal and conjunctival cultures of antimicrobial-resistant isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Deguchi, Hideto
    Kitazawa, Koji
    Deinhardt-Emmer, Stefanie
    Kayukawa, Kanae
    Morikawa, Eri
    Yamasaki, Toshihide
    Kinoshita, Shigeru
    Sotozono, Chie
    OCULAR SURFACE, 2022, 23 : 24 - 26
  • [48] Molecular characterization of community- & hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant & methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Sikkim
    Bhutia, Kunsang Ongmoo
    Singh, T. S. K.
    Adhikari, Luna
    Biswas, Shilpie
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 142 : 330 - 335
  • [49] An analysis of the association between genotype and antimicrobial resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates
    Aguadero, Vicente
    Gonzalez-Velasco, Carmen
    Vindel, Ana
    Gonzalez-Velasco, Miguel
    Jose Moreno, Juan
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA, 2015, 28 (02) : 79 - 85
  • [50] Nosocomial, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia:: Is it any worse than nosocomial methicillin-sensitive sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Selvey, LA
    Whitby, M
    Johnson, B
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 21 (10): : 645 - 648