Betaine reduces the irritating effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on human oral mucosa in vivo

被引:12
|
作者
Rantanen, I
Nicander, I
Jutila, K
Ollmar, S
Tenovuo, J
Söderling, E
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Inst Dent, FI-20520 Turku, Finland
[2] Huddinge Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Huddinge, Sweden
[3] Finnfeeds Finland Ltd, Espoo, Finland
[4] Karolinska Inst, Div Med Engn, Huddinge, Sweden
关键词
betaine; cocoamidopropylbetaine; electrical impedance; oral mucosa; sodium lauryl sulfate;
D O I
10.1080/00016350260248292
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Our aim was to evaluate whether betaine has a protective effect during exposure of the human oral mucosa in vivo to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) or cocoamidopropylbetaine (CAPB) as measured with a multifrequency electrical impedance spectrometer (EI). Both detergents were used at the concentration of 2.0% w/v with and without 4.0% w/v betaine in distilled water in 20 volunteers, and 0.5% and 1.0% w/v SLS combined with 4.0% w/v betaine in 5 volunteers. EI measurements were taken before application of the test solutions, after their removal, and every 15 min up to 45 min. Both 0.5% and 1% SLS solutions showed a significant reduction in 3 of the 4 indices, indicating mucosal irritation after the 15-min exposure (P < 0.05), whereas 2% SLS did so in all 4 indices (P < 0.001). Betaine had no effect on the detergent-induced decline with either the 2% or the 0.5% SLS solutions. However, when combined with the 1% SLS solution, betaine significantly (P < 0.05) reduced mucosal irritation by abolishing decreases in indices MIX (magnitude index) and IMIX (imaginary part index) and lowering it for PIX (phase index). The 2% CAPB solution showed a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in all 4 indices after the 15-min exposure, but the effect was significantly weaker than that of 2% SLS (P < 0.05). Betaine did not reduce the irritating effect of 2% CAPB. These findings can be used in the development of less irritating products for oral health care.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 310
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of xylitol in an enzyme-containing dentifrice without sodium lauryl sulfate on mutans streptococci in vivo
    Jannesson, L
    Renvert, S
    Birkhed, D
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 55 (04) : 212 - 216
  • [22] EFFECT OF SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE IN SOLUBILIZING PROTEIN FOR TRYPTOPHAN DETERMINATION
    CLEMENTE, E
    PORTELA, FD
    JOURNAL OF FOOD BIOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 12 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [23] REDUCED CLINICAL EFFECT OF MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE IN THE PRESENCE OF SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE
    MELSEN, B
    ROLLA, G
    CARIES RESEARCH, 1983, 17 (06) : 549 - 553
  • [24] EFFECT OF SORBITAN ESTERS ON INTERFACIAL ACTIVITY OF SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE
    WAN, LSC
    POON, PKC
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1971, 6 (03): : 59 - &
  • [25] Effect of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate on the Properties of the Electrodeposited Invar Alloy
    Kwak, Ji-Han
    Kim, In-Gyeong
    Park, Yong-Bum
    Shin, Se-Eun
    COATINGS, 2023, 13 (11)
  • [26] EFFECT ON PLAQUE ACCUMULATION OF A MOUTHWASH CONTAINING SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE
    PRETARASPANEDDA, P
    CANCRO, LP
    PADER, M
    JACOBS, D
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 65 : 310 - 310
  • [27] EFFECT OF SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE (SLS) ON EXPERIMENTAL GINGIVITIS DEVELOPMENT
    BAELUM, V
    DANIELSEN, B
    FEJERSKOV, O
    GAFFAR, A
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 432 - 432
  • [28] EFFECT OF SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE ON EGGSHELL QUALITY IN LAYING HENS
    PUROHIT, V
    PEOPLES, IC
    SEN, DK
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1982, 61 (07) : 1527 - 1527
  • [29] Effect of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) Applied as a Patch on Human Skin Physiology and Its Microbiota
    Leoty-Okombi, Sabrina
    Gillaizeau, Florence
    Leuillet, Sebastien
    Douillard, Benoit
    Le Fresne-Languille, Sophie
    Carton, Thomas
    De Martino, Alessandra
    Moussou, Philippe
    Bonnaud-Rosaye, Catherine
    Andre, Valerie
    COSMETICS, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [30] Impact of sodium lauryl sulfate in oral liquids on e-tongue measurements
    Immohr, Laura Isabell
    Turner, Roy
    Pein-Hackelbusch, Miriam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2016, 515 (1-2) : 441 - 448