HABITAT SUITABILITY MODELS AS TOOLS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE "ECOHYDRAULIC TRINITY"

被引:0
|
作者
Comoglio, Claudio [1 ]
Vezza, Paolo [1 ]
Parasiewicz, Piotr [2 ,3 ]
Suska, Katarzyna [2 ,3 ]
Petela, Jacek [2 ,3 ]
Calles, Olle [4 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Environm Land & Infrastruct Engn, Turin, Italy
[2] S Sakowicz Inland Fisheries Inst, Olsztyn, Poland
[3] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, Warsaw, Poland
[4] Karlstad Univ, Dept Biol, Karlstad, Sweden
关键词
HIGH-GRADIENT STREAMS; MESOHABSIM; HETEROGENEITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Habitat suitability models are being widely used for the simulation, under different spatial and temporal scales, of the instream habitat availability for aquatic and riparian species or communities. Their great potential can be also exploited for designing natural like fish-passes in the implementation of the so-called "ecohydraulic trinity": environmental flows (e-flows) assessment, re-establishing river continuity and designing river restoration measures. Indeed, nature-like fish passes can provide both e-flow releases and suitable habitat not only for fish, but for the entire aquatic community. We discuss from a theoretical point of view the potential of the integrated application of these modelling tools with particular regard to the microhabitat and mesohabitat scale approaches (e.g., PHABSIM, Bovee et al., 1982, MesoHABSIM, Parasie wicz et al., 2013). Advantages and limitations of each approach are highlighted and the application domain of each modeling approach is assessed. Results show, on the one hand, the advantages of the mesohabitat scale when channel slope and morphological complexity increase. Whereas, on the other hand, the microhabitat scale demonstrates effectiveness to evaluate potential habitat for motionless organisms, such as, freshwater pearl mussels. Limitations are related to the application of established hydraulic simulation models in the case of coarse substrate, limited water depth and gradient higher than 2%.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An integrated method to create habitat suitability models for fragmented landscapes
    Amici, Valerio
    Geri, Francesco
    Battisti, Corrado
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2010, 18 (03) : 215 - 223
  • [32] Can LiDAR data improve bird habitat suitability models?
    Tattoni, Clara
    Rizzolli, Franco
    Pedrini, Paolo
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 245 : 103 - 110
  • [33] A test of 3 models of Kirtland's warbler habitat suitability
    Nelson, MD
    Buech, RR
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1996, 24 (01): : 89 - 97
  • [34] An evaluation of alternative statistical models for predicting habitat suitability for weeds
    Dastres, Emran
    Edalat, Mohsen
    Moayedi, Gholamreza
    Jahangiri, Enayat
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Tiefenbacher, John P.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2022, 62 (06) : 404 - 421
  • [35] Using habitat suitability models for multiscale forensic geolocation analysis
    Wang, Haoyu
    Miller, Jennifer A. A.
    Grubesic, Tony H. H.
    Jha, Shalene
    TRANSACTIONS IN GIS, 2023, 27 (03) : 777 - 796
  • [36] Setting Priorities in River Management Using Habitat Suitability Models
    Bennetsen, Elina
    Gobeyn, Sacha
    Everaert, Gert
    Goethals, Peter
    WATER, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [37] The use of probabilistic habitat suitability models for biodiversity action planning
    Bayliss, JL
    Simonite, V
    Thompson, S
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 108 (03) : 228 - 250
  • [38] Developing a habitat suitability index with field data and hydraulic models
    Harris, Aubrey
    Mulchandani, Anjali
    Stone, Mark
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 40 (10) : 1903 - 1911
  • [39] Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences
    Hirzel, Alexandre H.
    Le Lay, Gwenaelle
    Helfer, Veronique
    Randin, Christophe
    Guisan, Antoine
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 199 (02) : 142 - 152
  • [40] Predictor importance in habitat suitability models for invasive terrestrial plants
    Williams, Demetra A.
    Shadwell, Keana S.
    Pearse, Ian S.
    Prevey, Janet S.
    Engelstad, Peder
    Henderson, Grace C.
    Jarnevich, Catherine S.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2024, 30 (09)