The process of care in preventive in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment

被引:65
|
作者
Alessi, CA
Stuck, AE
Aronow, HU
Yuhas, KE
Bula, CJ
Madison, R
Gold, M
SegalGidan, F
Fanello, R
Rubenstein, LZ
Beck, JC
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES MULTICAMPUS PROGRAM GERIAT & GERONTOL, LOS ANGELES, CA USA
[2] RAND CORP, SANTA MONICA, CA USA
[3] UNIV SO CALIF, L DAVIS SCH GERONTOL, LOS ANGELES, CA 90089 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05964.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To describe the process of care of a program of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and to determine: (1) if there are major findings in all domains of CGA (medical, functional, mental health, and social/environmental), (2) if there is a continued clinical yield when CGA is repeated annually, and (3) factors that affect patient adherence with recommendations from CGA. DESIGN: Descriptive prospective study of subjects allocated to the intervention group of a 3-year randomized trial of preventive in-home CGA. SETTING: Homes of participants living in an urban setting. PARTICIPANTS: Persons aged 75 years or older and living at home who received the intervention (N = 202 subjects, mean age 80.8 years, 70% female, 95% white, 64% living alone). INTERVENTION: Annual in-home CGA and quarterly home visits by gerontologic nurse practitioners for 3 years. MEASUREMENTS: Detailed data were collected prospectively on clinical problems detected by CGA, and specific recommendations were made for these problems using an instrument developed explicitly for this project to study the CGA process. Subject adherence with these recommendations was also recorded. RESULTS: Major problems were identified in all domains of CGA; the most common problems were medical. In the first year, 76.7% of subjects had at least one major problem identified that was either previously unknown or suboptimally treated. One-third of subjects had additional major problems identified during the second and third years. A constant number of therapeutic and preventive recommendations was made each year (11.5 per subject annually). Subject adherence varied by type of recommendation (ANOVA, F = 108.4, P <.001); adherence was better for referrals to a physician than for referrals to a non-physician professional or community service or for recommendations involving self-care activities (Scheffe's test, P <.001). CONCLUSION: In these community-dwelling older people, there was a continued yield of problems identified and recommendations made when CGA was repeated annually for 3 years, supporting the practice of repeat CGA in older people in the community. Subject adherence with recommendations from CGA varied by type of recommendation, but further work is needed to determine additional factors that affect this adherence and to determine the association between the yield of CGA (i.e., problems identified, recommendations given and adherence with these recommendations) and important clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1050
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In-home preventive comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) reduces mortality-A randomized controlled trial
    Frese, Thomas
    Deutsch, Tobias
    Keyser, Melanie
    Sandholzer, Hagen
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2012, 55 (03) : 639 - 644
  • [2] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IN-HOME PREVENTIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT (CGA)
    STUCK, AE
    ARONOW, H
    STEINER, A
    ALESSI, C
    BULA, C
    NISENBAUM, R
    RUBENSTEIN, LZ
    BECK, JC
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1994, 42 (02): : A219 - A219
  • [3] COMMUNITY PHYSICIANS COOPERATION WITH A PROGRAM OF IN-HOME COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT
    BULA, CJ
    ALESSI, CA
    ARONOW, HU
    YUHAS, K
    GOLD, M
    NISENBAUM, R
    BECK, JC
    RUBENSTEIN, LZ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1995, 43 (09) : 1016 - 1020
  • [4] In-home programs of prevention and comprehensive geriatric assessment: International perspectives
    Rubenstein, LZ
    Stewart, S
    Schroll, M
    Bernabei, R
    Bula, C
    Jones, D
    Wieland, D
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 1998, 17 (01): : 73 - 77
  • [5] Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment at Home: A Topic Review Importance and Generalities of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment as a Tool for Eldery Approach in Home Care
    Beltran, Maria Paula Vargas
    Gonzalez, Elly Alejandra Morros
    Porto, Saith De Jesus Hoyos
    UNIVERSITAS MEDICA, 2022, 63 (04):
  • [6] COMPARISON OF IN-HOME AND IN-CLINIC HOME EVALUATION IN GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT
    RAMSDELL, JW
    JACKSON, JE
    RENVALL, M
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1988, 36 (03): : A748 - A748
  • [7] Targeting community dwelling elderly for in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment: Do independent subjects benefit?
    Bula, CJ
    Berod, AC
    Stuck, AE
    Alessi, CA
    Aronow, HY
    SantosEggimann, B
    Rubenstein, LZ
    Beck, JC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1997, 45 (09) : A5 - A5
  • [8] METHODOLOGIC CHALLENGES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-STUDIES ON IN-HOME COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT - THE EIGER PROJECT
    STUCK, AE
    ZWAHLEN, HG
    NEUENSCHWANDER, BE
    SCHWEIZER, RAM
    BAUEN, G
    BECK, JC
    AGING-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 7 (03): : 218 - 223
  • [9] Erratum to: Methodologic challenges of randomized controlled studies on in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment: The EIGER project
    A. E. Stuck
    H. Gafner Zwahlen
    B. E. Neuenschwander
    R. A. Meyer Schweizer
    G. Bauen
    J. C. Beck
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 1998, 10 : 348 - 348
  • [10] PROACTIVE COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT FOR CARE HOME RESIDENTS LIVING WITH FRAILTY
    Robinson, A.
    Chaplin, A.
    Famsworth, M.
    Chan, C. Sin
    AGE AND AGEING, 2023, 52