Economic analysis of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of urinary tract infections in infants with high-grade hydronephrosis

被引:4
|
作者
Tu, H. Y. V. [1 ,2 ]
Pemberton, J. [3 ,4 ]
Lorenzo, A. J. [5 ]
Braga, L. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Healthcare, Inst Urol, Div Urol, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, McMaster Pediat Surg Res Collaborat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Div Urol, Main Off, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
关键词
Hydronephrosis; Urinary tract infection; Antibiotic prophylaxis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; RISK; PYELONEPHRITIS; MANAGEMENT; SEQUELAE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.031
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background For infants with hydronephrosis, continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) may reduce urinary tract infections (UTIs); however, its value remains controversial. Recent studies have suggested that neonates with severe obstructive hydronephrosis are at an increased risk of UTIs, and support the use of CAP. Other studies have demonstrated the negligible risk for UTIs in the setting of suspected ureteropelvic junction obstruction and have highlighted the limited role of CAP in hydronephrosis. Furthermore, economic studies in this patient population have been sparse. Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of CAP is an efficient expenditure for preventing UTIs in children with high-grade hydronephrosis within the first 2 years of life. Study design A decision model was used to estimate expected costs, clinical outcomes and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of CAP versus no CAP (Fig. 1). Cost data were collected from provincial databases and converted to 2013 Canadian dollars (CAD). Estimates of risks and health utility values were extracted from published literature. The analysis was performed over a time horizon of 2 years. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to assess uncertainty and robustness. Results Overall, CAP use was less costly and provided a minimal increase in health utility when compared to no CAP (Table). The mean cost over two years for CAP and no CAP was CAD$1571.19 and CAD$1956.44, respectively. The use of CAP reduced outpatient-managed UTIs by 0.21 infections and UTIs requiring hospitalization by 0.04 infections over 2 years. Costutility analysis revealed an increase of 0.0001 QALYs/ year when using CAP. The CAP arm exhibited strong dominance over no CAP in all sensitivity analyses and across all willingness-to-pay thresholds. Discussion The use of CAP exhibited strong dominance in the economic evaluation, despite a small gain of 0.0001 QALYs/ year. Whether this slight gain is clinically significant remains to be determined. However, small QALY gains have been reported in other pediatric economic evaluations. Strengths of this study included the use of data from a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, in addition to a comprehensive probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Limitations of this study included the use of estimates for UTI probabilities in the second year of life and health utility values, given that they were lacking in the literature. Spontaneous resolution of hydronephrosis and surgical management were also not implemented in this model. Conclusion To prevent UTIs within the first 2 years of life in infants with high-grade hydronephrosis, this probabilistic model has shown that CAP use is a prudent expenditure of healthcare resources when compared to no CAP.
引用
收藏
页码:247.e1 / 247.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prevention and alternative methods for prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections in women
    Vahlensieck, W
    Bauer, H
    UROLOGE, 2006, 45 (04): : 443 - +
  • [32] Trends in Intravenous Antibiotic Duration for Urinary Tract Infections in Young Infants
    Lewis-de los Angeles, William W.
    Thurm, Cary
    Hersh, Adam L.
    Shah, Samir S.
    Smith, Michael J.
    Gerber, Jeffrey S.
    Parker, Sarah K.
    Newland, Jason G.
    Kronman, Matthew P.
    Lee, Brian R.
    Brogan, Thomas V.
    Courter, Joshua D.
    Spaulding, Alicen
    Patel, Sameer J.
    PEDIATRICS, 2017, 140 (06)
  • [33] ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS FOR PREVENTION OF FEBRILE URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN WITH VESICOURETERAL REFLUX: A SUBGROUP META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Bessa, Jose, Jr.
    de Santana, Feira
    Mrad, Flavia
    de Fora, Juiz
    Bessa, Marcia
    Paschoalin, Victor
    Tiraboschi, Ricardo
    de Santana, Feira
    Sammour, Zein
    Gomes, Cristiano
    Netto, Jose Bastos, Jr.
    de Fora, Juiz
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E444 - E444
  • [34] Incidence of Breakthrough Urinary Tract Infection in Hospitalized Infants Receiving Antibiotic Prophylaxis
    Lloyd, Jessica C.
    Hornik, Christoph P.
    Benjamin, Daniel K.
    Clark, Reese H.
    Routh, Jonathan C.
    Smith, P. Brian
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2017, 56 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [35] Antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent recurrent infection in children with urinary tract infections
    Wald, Ellen
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2010, 156 (05): : 856 - 857
  • [36] Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infections in Children With Spina Bifida on Intermittent Catheterization
    Zegers, Bas
    Uiterwaal, Cuno
    Kimpen, Jan
    van Gool, Jan
    de Jong, Tom
    Winkler-Seinstra, Pauline
    Houterman, Saskia
    Verpoorten, Carla
    van Steenwijk, Catharine de Jong-de Vos
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06): : 2365 - 2370
  • [37] INCIDENCE OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS IN NEWBORNS WITH SPINA BIFIDA: IS ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS NECESSARY?
    Wallis, M. Chad
    Paramsothy, Pangaja
    Thibadeau, Judy
    Routh, Jonathan
    Joseph, David
    Cheng, Earl
    Tu, Duong
    Austin, Chris
    Koh, Chester
    Austin, Paul
    Tanaka, Stacy
    Walker, William
    Smith, Kathy
    Baum, Michelle
    Wiener, John
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E927 - E928
  • [38] Is antibiotic prophylaxis effective in preventing urinary tract infections in patients with vesicoureteral reflux?
    Hayashi, Yutaro
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    Kamisawa, Hideyuki
    Imura, Makoto
    Mizuno, Kentaro
    Kohri, Kenjiro
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2010, 8 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [39] Antibiotic Prophylaxis at Urinary Catheter Removal Prevents Urinary Tract Infections A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Pfefferkorn, Urs
    Lea, Sanlav
    Moldenhauer, Joerg
    Peterli, Ralph
    von Fluee, Markus
    Ackermann, Christoph
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 249 (04) : 573 - 575
  • [40] Continuous Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Infants with Grade III, IV, or V Vesicoureteral Reflux
    Mathew, Joseph L.
    Meena, Jitendra
    Hari, Pankaj
    Vasudev, A. S.
    Bhandari, Neha
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 61 (03) : 255 - 260