Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Insulin Glargine Biosimilar Ezelin versus Originator Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

被引:3
|
作者
Tarigan, Tri Juli Edi [1 ]
Dwijayanti, Adisti [2 ]
Setyowati, Susie [3 ]
Louisa, Melva [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo Natl Referral Hosp, Fac Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab,Dept Internal Med, Jakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Dept Med Pharm, Jakarta, Indonesia
[3] Gatot Soebroto Presidential Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
biosimilar; insulin autoantibody; zinc transporter 8 antibody; hyperglycemia; BLOOD-GLUCOSE; THERAPY; AUTOANTIBODIES; MANAGEMENT; PREFERENCE; INITIATION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2147/DMSO.S279385
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the immunogenicity and efficacy of insulin glargine biosimilar Ezelin (EZL) versus originator insulin glargine Lantus (LAN) as a reference basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Patients and Methods: This was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, 24-week study in insulin-naive patients with T2D, with HbA1c of >7.0%. We randomly assigned 133 eligible patients to receive either EZL or LAN. Baseline characteristics, including insulin autoantibody (IAA), zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) antibody, HbA1C, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2hPPG), AST, ALT, BUN, eGFR, and oral antidiabetic drugs, were obtained before starting insulin treatment. After starting treatment, insulin dose was titrated to achieve FPG target along with oral antidiabetic drugs. Patients were given home glucometer and assisted to record plasma glucose measurement and adverse event (AE). Every month, patients came to the diabetes clinic and performed a regular physical examination and intensifying treatment if needed. Out of the 133 randomized patients, only 122 completed the study and can be examined for their IAA and ZnT8 after 6 months of treatment. The study was registered in clinicaltrials. gov, NCT03352674. Results: There is a similar proportion of patients with changes of IAA from baseline: 1 out of 58 (1.7%) patients receiving EZL versus 1 out of 64 (1.6%) patients receiving LAN (p = 1.000). One patient in the EZL group (1.7%) versus none in the LAN group experienced a change of ZnT8 antibody from baseline. Similar glucose control in EZL versus LAN was determined by the change in HbA1c, FPG, and 2hPPG (-2.0%, -67.46 mg/dL, and -76.51 mg/dL in the EZL group versus -1.7%, -58.11 mg/dL, and -70.03 mg/dL in the LAN group). There were six events of documented hypoglycemia in the EZL group versus five events in the LAN group. No patients experienced diabetic ketoacidosis during the study. Conclusion: Overall, insulin glargine biosimilar EZL and originator insulin glargine LAN have shown a similar immunogenicity profile, as well as efficacy in providing glucose control and safety findings in T2D populations.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 116
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Insulin Glargine with Insulin Degludec in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
    Kuroda, Akio
    Tsuruo, Miho
    Takeshi, Kondo
    Aki, Nanako
    Oguro, Yukari
    Endo, Itsuro
    Aihara, Ken-ichi
    Tamaki, Motoyuki
    Matsumoto, Toshio
    Matsuhisa, Munehide
    DIABETES, 2014, 63 : A232 - A232
  • [32] INSULIN GLARGINE UTILIZATION IN REAL-LIFE-EFFICACY OF A REGIMEN BASED ON INSULIN GLARGINE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES PREVIOUSLY ON NPH INSULIN IN CLINICAL PRACTICE IN SPAIN
    Delgado, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A517 - A517
  • [33] Hypoglycemia and postprandial glucose are lower with insulin glargine versus NPH insulin in older type 2 diabetes patients
    Fritsche, A
    Dailey, G
    Lin, Z
    Murray, F
    Häring, H
    Rosenstock, J
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2004, 44 : 221 - 221
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China
    James L. Palmer
    Amélie Beaudet
    Jeremy White
    Juliette Plun-Favreau
    Jayne Smith-Palmer
    Advances in Therapy, 2010, 27 : 814 - 827
  • [35] Cost-Effectiveness of Biphasic Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China
    Palmer, James L.
    Beaudet, Amelie
    White, Jeremy
    Plun-Favreau, Juliette
    Smith-Palmer, Jayne
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2010, 27 (11) : 814 - 827
  • [36] Hypersensitivity reaction to a biosimilar insulin glargine
    Garcia-Nares, Hector
    Leyva-Carmona, Maria Isabel
    Perez-Xochipa, Neftali
    Chiquete, Erwin
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2015, 7 (02) : 155 - 157
  • [37] Insulin management in overweight or obese type 2 diabetes patients: the role of insulin glargine
    Davies, M.
    Khunti, K.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2008, 10 : 42 - 49
  • [38] Efficacy of combining insulin glulisine with basal insulin glargine in patients with type I and type 2 diabetes previously on premix insulin therapy
    Schreiber, S.
    Ferlinz, K.
    Donaubauer, B.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2007, 50 : S410 - S411
  • [39] Lower severe hypoglycemia risk: Insulin glargine versus NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes
    Dailey, George
    Strange, Poul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2008, 14 (01): : 25 - 30
  • [40] PREMIXED INSULIN LISPRO VERSUS INSULIN GLARGINE IN TYPE 2 DIABETES: A META-ANALYSIS
    Lili, Z.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A741 - A741