Tracing the roots of syntax with Bayesian phylogenetics

被引:23
|
作者
Maurits, Luke [1 ]
Griffiths, Thomas L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
language evolution; computational historical linguistics; psycholinguistics; NATURAL ORDER; WORD-ORDER; LANGUAGE; RECONSTRUCTION; UNIVERSALS; EXPANSION; GRAMMAR; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1319042111
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The ordering of subject, verb, and object is one of the fundamental components of the syntax of natural languages. The distribution of basic word orders across the world's languages is highly nonuniform, with the majority of languages being either subject-object- verb (SOV) or subject-verb-object (SVO). Explaining this fact using psychological accounts of language acquisition or processing requires understanding how the present distribution has resulted from ancestral distributions and the rates of change between orders. We show that Bayesian phylogenetics can provide quantitative answers to three important questions: how word orders are likely to change over time, which word orders were dominant historically, and whether strong inferences about the origins of syntax can be drawn from modern languages. We find that SOV to SVO change is more common than the reverse and VSO to SVO change is more common than VSO to SOV, and that if the seven language families we consider share a common ancestor then that common ancestor likely had SOV word order, but also that there are limits on how confidently we can make inferences about ancestral word order based on modern-day observations. These results shed new light on old questions from historical linguistics and provide clear targets for psychological explanations of word-order distributions.
引用
收藏
页码:13576 / 13581
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Are unequal clade priors problematic for Bayesian phylogenetics?
    Brandley, MC
    Leaché, AD
    Warren, DL
    McGuire, JA
    SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2006, 55 (01) : 138 - 146
  • [22] Choosing among Partition Models in Bayesian Phylogenetics
    Fan, Yu
    Wu, Rui
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Kuo, Lynn
    Lewis, Paul O.
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2011, 28 (01) : 523 - 532
  • [23] Bayesian inference of phylogenetics revisited: developments and concerns
    Randle, CP
    Mort, ME
    Crawford, DJ
    TAXON, 2005, 54 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [24] Bayesian Phylogenetics and Its Influence on Insect Systematics
    Ronquist, Fredrik
    Deans, Andrew R.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2010, 55 : 189 - 206
  • [25] The importance of proper model assumption in Bayesian phylogenetics
    Lemmon, AR
    Moriarty, EC
    SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2004, 53 (02) : 265 - 277
  • [26] Quantifying the impact of an inference model in Bayesian phylogenetics
    Bilderbeek, Richel J. C.
    Laudanno, Giovanni
    Etienne, Rampal S.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 12 (02): : 351 - 358
  • [27] Bayesian modelling of compositional heterogeneity in molecular phylogenetics
    Heaps, Sarah E.
    Nye, Tom M. W.
    Boys, Richard J.
    Williams, Tom A.
    Embley, T. Martin
    STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS IN GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2014, 13 (05) : 589 - 609
  • [28] Macromolecular interactions: tracing the roots
    Clegg, J
    Kell, D
    Knull, H
    Welch, GR
    Wilson, J
    TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 26 (02) : 91 - 91
  • [29] Macromolecular interactions: tracing the roots
    Srere, PA
    TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 25 (03) : 150 - 153
  • [30] Tracing the Roots of Molecular Biology
    Lakhotia, Subhash C.
    RESONANCE-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2025, 30 (03): : 379 - 409