Conversion of Vascular Access Type Among Incident Hemodialysis Patients: Description and Association With Mortality

被引:82
|
作者
Bradbury, Brian D. [1 ]
Chen, Fangfei [1 ]
Furniss, Anna [2 ]
Pisoni, Ronald L. [3 ]
Keen, Marcia
Mapes, Donna [3 ]
Krishnan, Mahesh
机构
[1] Amgen Inc, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[2] Colorado Hlth Inst, Denver, CO USA
[3] Arbor Res Collaborat Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
Vascular access; hemodialysis; mortality; DIALYSIS OUTCOMES; PRACTICE PATTERNS; ARTERIOVENOUS-FISTULA; MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS; VENOUS CATHETERS; UNITED-STATES; ESRD PATIENTS; DOPPS; COMPLICATIONS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Limited data exist describing vascular access conversions during the first year on dialysis therapy or the effect of converting to and from a catheter on subsequent mortality risk. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: We studied a random sample of incident US hemodialysis patients (initiated long-term dialysis < 30 days before study entry) in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS; 1996-2004). Predictors: At dialysis therapy initiation, we assessed vascular access type in use (arteriovenous fistula [AVF], arteriovenous graft [AVG], or catheter) and other patient characteristics. We characterized changes in vascular access type (conversions) by using regularly collected functional status information. Outcome & Measurements: We assessed time to all-cause mortality. We first described conversions, then used time-dependent Cox regression to estimate mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for conversions from a catheter to a permanent vascular access (versus no conversion) and conversions from a permanent vascular access to a catheter (versus no conversion). Results: The study included 4,532 patients; 69.2% were dialyzing with a catheter; 17.6%, with an AVG; and 13.1%, with an AVF In patients initiating therapy with an AVF or AVG, 22% experienced a conversion (failure), and median times to first failure were 62 and 84 days, respectively. In catheter patients, 59% converted to an AVF/AVG (predominantly AVG [57%]); median times to first conversion were 92 and 66 days, respectively. Conversion to a permanent access was associated with an adjusted mortality HR of 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.85). The effect was similar for conversion to an AVF or AVG, and these persisted across demographic groups and facilities with different conversion practices. Conversion from a permanent vascular access to a catheter was associated with an adjusted mortality HR of 1.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 2.68). Limitations: Potential for residual confounding because of unmeasured factors influencing decision to convert. Conclusion: Vascular access conversions are common in incident patients. Continued efforts to increase early nephrologist referral and permanent vascular access placement may help decrease mortality risk in incident dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 53:804-814. (C) 2009 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 814
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vascular Access, Complications and Survival in Incident Hemodialysis Patients
    Torreggiani, Massimo
    Bernasconi, Lucia
    Colucci, Marco
    Accarino, Simone
    Pasquinucci, Ettore
    Esposito, Vittoria
    Sileno, Giuseppe
    Esposito, Ciro
    KIDNEY AND DIALYSIS, 2021, 1 (02): : 88 - 99
  • [22] Type of Vascular Access and Survival among Very Elderly Hemodialysis Patients
    Praga, Manuel
    Ignacio Merello, Jose
    Palomares, Ines
    Bayh, Inga
    Marcelli, Daniele
    Aljama, Pedro
    Luno, Jose
    NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 124 (1-2): : 47 - 53
  • [23] Vascular Access Type and Clinical Outcomes among Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis
    Lee, Timmy
    Thamer, Mae
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhang, Yi
    Allon, Michael
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 12 (11): : 1823 - 1830
  • [24] Association of Ultrafiltration Rate with Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Chang, Tae Ik
    Kim, Tae Hee
    Chou, Jason A.
    Soohoo, Melissa
    Ravel, Vanessa A.
    Kovesdy, Csaba P.
    Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar
    Streja, Elani
    NEPHRON, 2018, 139 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [25] Association of lactate dehydrogenase with mortality in incident hemodialysis patients
    Ryu, Soh Young
    Kleine, Carola-Ellen
    Hsiung, Jui-Ting
    Park, Christina
    Rhee, Connie M.
    Moradi, Hamid
    Hanna, Ramy
    Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar
    Streja, Elani
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 36 (04) : 704 - 712
  • [26] AN INVERSE ASSOCIATION OF PROTEINURIA WITH MORTALITY IN INCIDENT HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS
    Hishida, Manabu
    Inaguma, Daijo
    Shafi, Tariq
    Matsushita, Kunihiro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 71 (04) : 545 - 546
  • [27] Type of vascular access and survival among incident hemodialysis patients: The choices for healthy outcomes in caring for ESRD (CHOICE) study
    Astor, BC
    Eustace, JA
    Powe, NR
    Klag, MJ
    Fink, NE
    Coresh, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (05): : 1449 - 1455
  • [28] Influence of Vascular Access Type on Gender and Ethnicity Related Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients
    Woo, Karen
    Yao, Janis
    Selevan, David C.
    Hye, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 : 96S - 96S
  • [29] Trends in Incident Hemodialysis Access and Mortality
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    Canner, Joseph K.
    Hicks, Caitlin W.
    Arhuidese, Isibor J.
    Zarkowsky, Devin S.
    Qazi, Umair
    Schneider, Eric B.
    Black, James H., III
    Segev, Dorry L.
    Freischlag, Julie A.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (05) : 441 - 448
  • [30] Vascular Access Choice in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Decision Analysis
    Drew, David A.
    Lok, Charmaine E.
    Cohen, Joshua T.
    Wagner, Martin
    Tangri, Navdeep
    Weiner, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 26 (01): : 183 - 191