Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review

被引:40
|
作者
Arantes, M. [1 ,2 ]
Arantes, J. [3 ]
Ferreira, M. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Unit Anat, Dept Biomed, Al Prof Hernani Monteiro, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
[2] Portuguese Inst Oncol, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradiol, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Minho, Psychol Sch, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth Forens Sci & Med Educ, Al Prof Hernani Monteiro, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
来源
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Neuroanatomy; Education; Teaching; Learning; Student; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; GROSS-ANATOMY; CURRICULUM; SATISFACTION; NEUROSCIENCE; PERCEPTIONS; NEUROPHOBIA; INTEGRATION; RETENTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-018-1210-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this review was to identify studies exploring neuroanatomy teaching tools and their impact in learning, as a basis towards the implementation of a neuroanatomy program in the context of a curricular reform in medical education. Methods: Computer-assisted searches were conducted through March 2017 in the PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Current Contents Connect, KCI and Scielo Citation Index databases. Four sets of keywords were used, combining "neuroanatomy" with "education", "teaching", "learning" and "student*". Studies were reviewed independently by two readers, and data collected were confirmed by a third reader. Results: Of the 214 studies identified, 29 studies reported data on the impact of using specific neuroanatomy teaching tools. Most of them (83%) were published in the last 8 years and were conducted in the United States of America (65.52%). Regarding the participants, medical students were the most studied sample (37.93%) and the majority of the studies (65.52%) had less than 100 participants. Approximately half of the studies included in this review used digital teaching tools (e.g., 3D computer neuroanatomy models), whereas the remaining used non-digital learning tools (e.g., 3D physical models). Conclusions: Our work highlight the progressive interest in the study of neuroanatomy teaching tools over the last years, as evidenced from the number of publications and highlight the need to consider new tools, coping with technological development in medical education.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Open education resources' benefits and challenges in the academic world: a systematic review
    Adil, Hafiz Muhammad
    Ali, Shahbaz
    Sultan, Mussarat
    Ashiq, Murtaza
    Rafiq, Muhammad
    GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE MEMORY AND COMMUNICATION, 2024, 73 (03) : 274 - 291
  • [22] More than surgical tools: a systematic review of robots as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences
    Marcos-Pablos, Samuel
    Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco Jose
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2022, 27 (04) : 1139 - 1176
  • [23] More than surgical tools: a systematic review of robots as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences
    Samuel Marcos-Pablos
    Francisco José García-Peñalvo
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2022, 27 : 1139 - 1176
  • [24] Tools for neuroanatomy and neurogenetics in Drosophila
    Pfeiffer, Barret D.
    Jenett, Arnim
    Hammonds, Ann S.
    Ngo, Teri-T B.
    Misra, Sima
    Murphy, Christine
    Scully, Audra
    Carlson, Joseph W.
    Wan, Kenneth H.
    Laverty, Todd R.
    Mungall, Chris
    Svirskas, Rob
    Kadonaga, James T.
    Doe, Chris Q.
    Eisen, Michael B.
    Celniker, Susan E.
    Rubin, Gerald M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) : 9715 - 9720
  • [25] Environmental Education: A Systematic Review on the Use of Digital Tools for Fostering Sustainability Awareness
    Hajj-Hassan, Mira
    Chaker, Rawad
    Cederqvist, Anne-Marie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [26] Digital Escape Rooms as Innovative Pedagogical Tools in Education: A Systematic Literature Review
    Makri, Agoritsa
    Vlachopoulos, Dimitrios
    Martina, Richard A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [27] Technological Tools and Inclusive Pedagogy for Students with Disabilities in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
    Rueda, Ruth Zarate
    Peralta, Juan Camilo Lesmes
    Villamizar, Yolima Ivonne Beltran
    RIE-REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA, 2025, 43
  • [28] Influence of Technological Tools in the Teaching of Morphology in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.
    Ampuero-Valenzuela, I. Paz
    Riquelme-Vilches, Valentina F. I.
    Vargas-Zurita, Eduardo
    Araya-Figueroa, Sofia
    Cozzi-Ahumada, Renata
    Riquelme-Bahamondes, Camila
    Herrera-Alcaino, Alvaro
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 5 (04):
  • [29] Tools to Assess Behavioral and Social Science Competencies in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Palmer, Ryan T.
    Miller, Marissa Fuqua
    Thayer, Erin K.
    Estroff, Sue E.
    Litzelman, Debra K.
    Biagioli, Frances E.
    Teal, Cayla R.
    Lambros, Ann
    Hatt, William J.
    Satterfield, Jason M.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2016, 91 (05) : 730 - 742
  • [30] Perspectives on how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: a systematic review
    da Silva M.M.O.
    Teixeira J.M.X.N.
    Cavalcante P.S.
    Teichrieb V.
    Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 2019, 25 (01)