Transition Intervention for Adolescents With Congenital Heart Disease

被引:102
|
作者
Mackie, Andrew S. [1 ,2 ]
Rempel, Gwen R. [1 ,3 ]
Kovacs, Adrienne H. [4 ,5 ]
Kaufman, Miriam [6 ,7 ]
Rankin, Kathryn N. [1 ]
Jelen, Ahlexxi [6 ]
Yaskina, Maryna [8 ]
Sananes, Renee [6 ]
Oechslin, Erwin [4 ,5 ]
Dragieva, Dimi [6 ]
Mustafa, Sonila [6 ]
Williams, Elina [2 ]
Schuh, Michelle [2 ]
Manlhiot, Cedric [6 ]
Anthony, Samantha J. [6 ]
Magill-Evans, Joyce [9 ]
Nicholas, David [10 ]
McCrindle, Brian W. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Pediat, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Stollery Childrens Hosp, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Athabasca Univ, Athabasca, AB, Canada
[4] Toronto Congenital Cardiac Ctr Adults, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Alberta, Women & Childrens Hlth Res Inst, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[9] Univ Alberta, Fac Rehabil Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[10] Univ Calgary, Fac Social Work, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
adolescent; clinical trial; intervention; transition; ADULT HEALTH-CARE; YOUNG-ADULTS; FOLLOW-UP; LOST; PREVALENCE; POPULATION; READINESS; MORTALITY; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.043
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of interventions to prepare adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) to enter adult care. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of a nurse-led transition intervention on lapses between pediatric and adult care. METHODS A cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted of a nurse-led transition intervention for 16- to 17-year-olds with moderate or complex CHD versus usual care. The intervention group received two 1-h individualized sessions targeting CHD education and self-management skills. The primary outcome was excess time to adult CHD care, defined as the interval between the final pediatric and first adult cardiology appointments, minus the recommended time interval, analyzed by using Cox proportional hazards regression accounting for clustering. Secondary outcomes included scores on the MyHeart CHD knowledge survey and the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 121 participants were randomized to receive the intervention (n = 58) or usual care (n = 63). At the recommended time of first adult appointment (excess time = 0), intervention participants were 1.8 times more likely to have their appointment within 1 month (95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 2.9; Cox regression, p = 0.018). This hazard increased with time; at an excess time of 6 months, intervention participants were 3.0 times more likely to have an appointment within 1 month (95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 8.3). The intervention group had higher scores at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months on the MyHeart knowledge survey (mixed models, p < 0.001) and the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire self-management index (mixed models, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS A nurse-led intervention reduced the likelihood of a delay in adult CHD care and improved CHD knowledge and self-management skills. (Congenital Heart Adolescents Participating in Transition Evaluation Research [ CHAPTER 2]; NCT01723332) (c) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1768 / 1777
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In utero intervention for severe congenital heart disease
    Gardiner, Helena M.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 58 : 42 - 54
  • [42] Percutaneous Intervention in Adult Congenital Heart Disease
    Arzamendi, Dabit
    Miro, Joaquim
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 65 (08): : 690 - 699
  • [43] Transcatheter intervention in the neonate with congenital heart disease
    Kreutzer, J
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2001, 28 (01) : 137 - +
  • [44] What makes transition programs work? A process evaluation of the Stepstones transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease
    Saarijarvi, Markus
    Wallin, Lars
    Gyllensten, Hanna
    Moons, Philip
    Bratt, Ewa-Lena
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 52 : 5 - 6
  • [45] Do not forget the parentsParents' concerns during transition to adult care for adolescents with congenital heart disease
    Bratt, E. L.
    Burstrom, A.
    Hanseus, K.
    Rydberg, A.
    Berghammer, M.
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 44 (02) : 278 - 284
  • [46] The Challenges of Transfer and Transition in Congenital Heart Disease
    Learn, Christopher P.
    Jefferies, John Lynn
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2016, 80 (05) : 1108 - 1109
  • [47] Transition in congenital heart disease: it takes a village
    Gurvitz, M.
    Saidi, A.
    HEART, 2014, 100 (14) : 1075 - 1076
  • [48] Transition - Aftercare for Adults with congenital Heart Disease
    Kaemmerer, Harald
    Andonian, Caroline
    Ewert, Peter
    Freilinger, Sebastian
    Nagdyman, Nicole
    Neidenbach, Rhoia
    Schelling, Joerg
    Huntgeburth, Michael
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2021, 146 (18) : 1192 - 1199
  • [49] Efficacy of a Transition Program in Adolescents and Young Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: The TRANSITION-CHD Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bredy, Charlene
    Werner, Oscar
    Huguet, Helena
    Guillaumont, Sophie
    Auer, Annie
    Requirand, Anne
    Lavastre, Kathleen
    Abassi, Hamouda
    de la Villeon, Gregoire
    Vincenti, Marie
    Gavotto, Arthur
    Vincent, Remi
    Pommier, Victor
    Dulac, Yves
    Souletie, Nathalie
    Acar, Philippe
    Karsenty, Clement
    Guitarte, Aitor
    Berge, Marie
    Marguin, Gaelle
    Masseron, Marie-Paule
    Pages, Laurence
    Bourrel, Gerard
    Engberink, Agnes Oude
    Million, Elodie
    Huby, Anne-Cecile
    Leobon, Bertrand
    Picot, Marie-Christine
    Amedro, Pascal
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2024, 75 (02) : 358 - 367
  • [50] ADOLESCENTS WITH CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: A HIGH RISK GROUP
    Kulkarni, Aparna
    Zybert, Patricia
    Kutty, Shelby
    Neugebauer, Richard
    Anderson, Brett
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 1012 - 1012